Posted on 08/10/2006 7:11:55 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
The question made Williams' moral relativism mode kick in and try to show that both sides had "equal" types of fighters. He failed miserably in his pathetic PC attempt. Pieces of trash like Williams can't wrap their tiny brains around the fact that every culture is not equal, and pointing out something bad about one culture doesn't create the need to "balance" the statement with some analogy from our culture.
Like Brian Williams is on our team. The other team picked him, and even then he got picked last.
Brian is a dumb ass but just for the record he lives in NJ and is a Firefighter in his town !
> Williams: "And that, Chris, that last aspect, the willingness to take one's own life -- I always tell people there are guys on our team like that, too. They're called Army Rangers and Navy Seals and the Special Forces folks and the first responders on 9/11 who went into those buildings knowing, by the way, they weren't going to come out. So we have players like that on our team."
GL: Williams is not making the point that our guys are terrorists. He very properly focused in on one "aspect" of commonality, the willingness to die for a cause. Unless there's something wrong with the greater context these remarks were made in, there is absolutely nothing incorrect about Williams' remarks.
p.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
Nobody's saying he wasn't dumb.
This isn't the first time he sounds like a dunce!
**
Yeah, but the important thing is that his hair always looks good.
UPDATE: BRIAN BLOGS BACK
Apparently stung by criticism of his comments, Brian Williams has responded with a clarification at the Daily Nightly, the in-house blog of the NBC Nightly News.
Williams accuses people, presumably including me, of having "aggressively misunderstood" his comments. I've never heard that formulation, have you? Sounds like a euphemism for "intentionally misconstrued." If so, why not say it?
Williams makes clear what was never really in doubt: that in his own way he was seeking to praise our people.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of his entry is Williams noting that his comments were made "during a live interview" with Chris Matthews. Translation: 'Hey, I'm basically just a newsreader. Cut me some slack when I have to think on my feet rather than reading off a teleprompter.' In any case, here's the entire entry [Hat Tip to NB poster d1carter]:
Comments I made during a live interview with Chris Matthews last night have been aggressively misunderstood in the hours since. Here was my point: people always say that our country will be at a disadvantage as long as the "other side" is willing to take their own life for the cause. I was making the point that if that's some kind of litmus test for bravery... or belief in the cause, we have those guys, too. People who fight for us, people who protect us -- know full well that the American cause is worth dying for -- as are our freedoms. People are dying for the U.S. side every day. Laying their lives on the line. And I give thanks for them every day. I was not at all equating the "other" cause with what Americans stand for. I was criticizing the view, expressed by some, that as long as we are fighting the "suicide bomber mentality" we can never get the upper hand, because, as this belief goes, "we aren't willing to give our lives the way they are." Of course we are. The difference is: the folks willing to die for OUR country do so in the act of protecting and defending it -- NOT killing civilians by detonating an explosive and killing innocent people.
I hope that clears it up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.