A Perfect Storm: TERRORIST MOVEMENT DISGUISED AS NATIONALISM + A LEGACY DISGUISED AS A PRESIDENCY

Mark Steyn, David Horowitz et al. | 7.26.06 | Mia T

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Rummyfan]

Great post as always Mia! The Dems are no friends of Israel. Can someone explain why American Jews vote overwhelmingly Democratic????

[Mia T]

thx. :)

Not this NY born-and-bred Jew. More later....

[E.G.C.]

Mia T. Bump.

[Mia T]

thx :)

[FlyVet]

Bump for another informative post, Mia.

Certain people (CLINTONS) always seem to gravitate toward evil and corruption, hence Billy Jeff's love affair with Arafat. Oh, and it's nice to see that Hillary! hasn't lost her taste for dirty money.

[Wolverine]

bump

[SJackson]

If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. also

2006israelwar or WOT

..................

[Valin]

Bump and bookmark!

[malia]

"First Lady Silent in face of 'blood libel' on Israel

SHAME ON HILLARY!"

NO......

!!!!!!SHAME ON OUR MEDIA!!!!!!

[rennatdm]

ping

[Gail Wynand]

There is an effective military strategy for dealing with milttant resistance within an indiginous population. That japanese militarists, if they didnt invent it, used it efficiently and ruthlessly in China before and during WWII. They called it "the three alls". . . "Burn All Destroy All. Kill All." Ruthless but very effective.

What liberals and jihadists need to know and be reminded of, is that if the current "nice guy" approach of GWB (democracy; surgical military opposition to terrorism) fails, America will not go softly into the good night of Islamic fundamentalism and their terrorist ambitions.

America and Israel, must and will, first, resort to crude use of overwhelming force, when the next round of 9/11 style attacks arrives.

The sooner either of our countries demonstrates to the world that that is where they are prepared to go when diplomacy fails, the sooner an end will be found to the terror. For all of our handwringing over "civilian casualties" history makes clear that war ends only when one side is truly defeated, and that ultimately real adversaries (not proxy fights like the French in Algeria) will exhaust total force available to them before yeilding (e.g. Dresden, Stalingrad, Nagasaki)

Clinton is/was merely the manifestation of liberal ideology -- expedience without principle, ineffective, hopelessly misdirected, and ready to blame anything and anyone but themselves for failure. If America again chooses liberalism, it will be choosing suicide.

[Mia T]

 

Q ERTY4_bump

[Mia T]

thanx :)

[Mia T]

thank you :)

[Mia T]

!!!!!SHAME ON OUR MEDIA!!!!!!

IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)

by Mia T, 6.27.06

"What is government itself but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary."

James Madison

hen the founders granted 'The Press' special dispensation, they never considered the possibility that traitors in our midst would game the system. But that is precisely what is happening today. (Hate America? Support jihad? Become a 'journalist!')

This was bound to happen.

The premise behind the First Amendment as it applies to the press--that a vigilant watchdog is necessary, sufficient--indeed, possible--to protect against man's basest instincts--is tautologically flawed: The fox guarding the White House, if you will.

Walter Lippmann, the 20th-century American columnist, wrote, "A free press is not a privilege, but an organic necessity in a great society." True in theory. True even in Lippmann's quaint mid-20th-century America, perhaps. But patently false in this postmodern era of the bubbas and the Pinches.

When a free and great society is hijacked by a seditious bunch of dysfunctional, power-hungry malcontents and elitists, it will remain neither free nor great for long. When hijacked by them in the midst of asymmetric warfare, it will soon not remain at all.

If President George W. Bush is serious about winning the War on Terror, he will aggressively pursue the enemy in our midst.

Targeting and defeating the enemy in our midst is, by far, the more difficult task and will measure Bush's resolve and courage (and his independence from the MPRDC (mutual protection racket in DC)) more than any pretty speech, more even than 'staying the course.'

No government ought to be without censors; and where the press is free no one ever will.

Thomas Jefferson
Letter, September 9, 1792, to George Washington

It is hard to believe that a man is telling the truth when you know that you would lie if you were in his place.

H. L. Mencken

READ MORE

'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)
PINCH'S NON-APOLOGY APOLOGY
by Mia T, July 18, 2006

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006

[Mia T]

WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES
by Mia T, 7.11.06