Skip to comments.
Push for easier spelling persists despite lack of public interest
http://www.lubbockonline.com/stories/070606/nat_070606038.shtml ^
| Thursday, July 6, 2006
| AP
Posted on 07/06/2006 9:29:22 AM PDT by WestTexasWend
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Millee
Didn't want you to miss this.
2
posted on
07/06/2006 9:30:46 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: Mike Bates
This is the STOOPIST thing I've ever RED.
3
posted on
07/06/2006 9:32:17 AM PDT
by
Hildy
(Change calls the tune we dance to.)
To: WestTexasWend
4
posted on
07/06/2006 9:32:47 AM PDT
by
keithtoo
(The GOP is fortunate that the Dim's are even more spineless and disorganized.)
To: WestTexasWend
"wuudn't it maek mor sens to spel wurdz the wae thae sound"NO!!!!
5
posted on
07/06/2006 9:32:52 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: WestTexasWend
illiteracy rates would drop. Know, they wood knot.
6
posted on
07/06/2006 9:32:53 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(At least drunken sailors spend their own money, Congress doesn't.)
To: WestTexasWend
Liberal dumbing down of the language hasn't caught on. But it hasn't stopped them from pushing it.
(The Palestinian terrorist regime is the crisis and Israel's fist is the answer.)
7
posted on
07/06/2006 9:33:06 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: WestTexasWend
8
posted on
07/06/2006 9:33:29 AM PDT
by
Still Thinking
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: Mike Bates
They'll try anything to make people even more stupid.
I guarantee you their are people out there that genuinely think this is a GREAT IDEA because they did poorly in spelling.
9
posted on
07/06/2006 9:33:45 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
To: WestTexasWend
"We try to show where these spellings are used and to show dictionary makers that they are used so they will include them as alternate spellings." Uh, no. That's called the dumbing down of America. Just because people misspell words, doesn't make it correct.
My biggest gripe is when folks don't know the difference between "then" and "than". It's not simple spelling. It's a completely different word and definition.
10
posted on
07/06/2006 9:34:01 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: Mike Bates
They'll try anything to make people even more stupid.
I guarantee you there are people out there that genuinely think this is a GREAT IDEA because they did poorly in spelling.
11
posted on
07/06/2006 9:35:18 AM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
To: WestTexasWend
DUMB-DA-DUMB-DUMB! DUMB!
12
posted on
07/06/2006 9:36:17 AM PDT
by
Lady Jag
(I dreamed I surfed all day in my monthly donor wonder bra [https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate])
To: WestTexasWend
There have been many proposals to change English spelling, and all have failed. All will continue to fail.
One problem is that the new orthographies all attempt to spell the language as it is spoken. Sadly, English is not spoken the same universally, even in the United states.
I give you some Southern spellings that would cause some problems with the new orthography:
Awl -- A lubricant
Far -- A conflagration
You can find such oddities in every region of the country. In Boston:
pawk -- to put a cah in a place deigned for temporary storage.
You see what I mean. These attempts are doomed from the get-go.
13
posted on
07/06/2006 9:37:11 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(non-evangelical atheist)
To: Still Thinking; Millee
Sorry...searched and didn't find.
AdMon, lock and unload as you please.
To: mtbopfuyn
My gripe is "He pleaded guilty" instead of "He plead guilty" - also ending sentences with prepositions "what did he do that for"
I read that article in last nights paper and the first thing I thought was how far libs would go to dumb down our kids.
To: Michael.SF.
16
posted on
07/06/2006 9:39:44 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: WestTexasWend
Eye dew knot no, half two weight & sea
17
posted on
07/06/2006 9:41:32 AM PDT
by
M38
To: WestTexasWend
Those who like to know where a word comes from and what it means as well as what it used to mean before it was denatured by illiterates in the press like to see the spelling because that is what separates similar-sounding words and makes it possible to be traced back to the original Indo-European for its original meaning and links to the same word as it appears in many other languages.
18
posted on
07/06/2006 9:42:50 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Off touch and out of base)
To: WestTexasWend
I am one of those people who believe that a universal language would be a good thing. Unfortunately, it looks like English is winning that contest. If I could make the choice, it would be Esperanto
http://www.esperanto.net/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto) Loosely Spanish based, truly phonetic, and easily extensible. Then again, I liked Ada as a computer language as well, and the geeks among us know how well that did.
All of the popular languages in use are hybrids with interesting historical roots, but with enough oddities in pronunciation and conjugation that it makes meaningful automation needlessly difficult. A good metaphor for the human condition.
19
posted on
07/06/2006 9:44:20 AM PDT
by
Starwolf
To: MineralMan
wilbar - a device with one and possibly two wheels used for transporting dirt from one place to another..
20
posted on
07/06/2006 9:45:57 AM PDT
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(I'm a Patriot Guard Rider..www.patriotguard.org for info)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson