We can pressure politicians in an election year and get heard.
thank you
The Sulzbergs are the owners. Frog march the bunch!
I don't think anything is going to happen. The NYT will just be considered even more a Bat Boy Newspaper
Now we're talking... thanks OT.
There is this, and just today the NY Times printed a "classified" briefing from Gen. Casey on the reduction of troops from Iraq by 2007 beginning this September. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/25/world/middleeast/25military.html?ex=1308888000&en=f51dc3bd1a5ff247&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
They need to set up a sting.
Who's telling the NYT all this stuff?
The Republican Party and the Bush Administration will never have the guts to stand up to the LSM.
The FBI needs to investigate this matter and obtain an indictment from a federal grand jury. If warranted, the NY Times and the individual(s) who leaked the classified information to the NY Times, need to be prosecuted.
"We need to get angry and send a call to Congress, The Justice Dept, and the White House just as we did with Harriet Myers and amnesty for illegal immigrants.
We can pressure politicians in an election year and get heard."
That's the ticket. Let's pressure our elected officials to find and punish the leaker.
"We need to get angry and send a call to Congress, The Justice Dept, and the White House just as we did with Harriet Myers and amnesty for illegal immigrants.
We can pressure politicians in an election year and get heard."
That's the ticket. Let's pressure our elected officials to find and punish the leaker.
All cultures are equal, even the ones that strap child size suicide vests on their three year olds, say the multiculturalists.
The Times' 1996 endorsement of bill clinton1 was the problem. The endorsement, you may recall, was contingent on clinton getting a brain transplant--specifically of the character lobe.2 How could The Times square that shameful, irresponsible endorsement with this monstrous failure3?
|
NY Times Justifies its Disclosure of Top Secret Program
Despite a plea from the Bush Administration, the New York Times ran a story revealing that the U.S. government was tracking terrorists through their bank accounts. The classified information disclosed in the Times piece was obtained from unnamed sources alleged to be working for the CIA.
“The Bush Administration’s claim that this disclosure would aid America’s enemies is ludicrous,” said Times editor Isaac Mohlman. “I mean, the Bush Administration is America’s most dangerous enemy. Anything we can do to thwart its evil designs is our patriotic duty.”
The Bush Administration voiced its disappointment at the Times willingness to undermine anti-terrorist efforts. “Training, feeding, housing and arming terrorists requires money,” said Tony Snow, President Bush’s press secretary. “Tracking this money through our banking system is one tool we’ve used to try to prevent attacks on Americans. The effectiveness of this tool has been undermined by the Times article.”
Since the Times story broke banks have reported an outflow of deposits from accounts domiciled in U.S. banks to banks centered in Europe. Muslim banks are disfavored by terrorists because the Koran prohibits paying interest on deposits. An al-Qaeda training manual urges jihadis to “turn the infidels’ sin of usury against them to multiply our resources for carrying out Allah’s will.”
read more satire...
http://www.azconservative.org/Semmens1.htm
Indicting might be counterproductive and probably what the Slimes wants. Boost their crumbling circulation.
Bush needs to make headlines by some good old-fashioned plain talk. Tell it like it is. They're going to hate him anyway.
I want the administration to push back on these presstitute bastards. Now. Hard.
Why they haven't been shot on sight is the real question. This lawyer fellow is a mamby-pamby for asking for nothing more than an indictment of some sort ~ he forgot this is not a criminal matter ~ it's a war ~ and the Times is now among the enemy troops.
I wish the NYslimes would just move to the Middle East and be done with it.
This should not be rocket science. Who attended General Casey's briefing? Some "American officials" gave secret information to the NYSlimes. Round them all up and give them lie detector tests. Enough of this crap.
I saw a picture with the address of the NY Slimes, it showed 229 but it never showed a street name. Can someone provide me the street name?
Thank you,
Osama
oldtimer2 is not the source of this problem, the source (the American Thinker) is, but this title is wholly inappropriate. This headline appears to say that the attorney general of the United States is calling for the New York Times to be indicted; the colon indicates that it is Gonzales speaking.
Bingo- go after em with the gloves off.
If the President and/or his team had negotiations, discussions, or frickin summits with the all-sovereign NYT, maybe the Times knows it is safe to kick sand in their eyes.
Why prosecute them if their defense is going to be, "But she didn't say 'NO.' "
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654798/posts
According to the Weekly Standard linked at above thread:
"Asked in late May about the prospect of prosecuting the Times and others who publish classified information, he by no means ruled it out. 'There are some statutes on the books,' he said, 'which, if you read the language carefully, would seem to indicate that that is a possibility.' "
My reading of this is that (well, we don't have all the facts and the jury's out and we'll have to double-check but speaking off the top of my head there's some likelihood it appears to me that we cannot rule out that, consistency-wise,) the AG is so squishy, the line forms to the rear.
Conservative Judge Nepiotano (FOX News Judge) said that we cannot sue the paper. Too bad Gonzales is not conservative otherwise he may know this.
Yeah! Now you're talking. Subpoena the traitors and jail them! Show 'em we're not going to take their crap anymore! Whoo-hoo!
