Skip to comments.
CA: Lots of gay Assembly candidates--on the GOP side (Log Cabin Republicans) *FR mention*
Capitol Weekly ^
| 6/22/06
| Malcolm Maclachlan
Posted on 06/22/2006 9:16:59 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
It is no coincidence that the relatively gay-friendly Schwarzenegger is the most successful Republican in recent California history, Bissiri said, even as he goes against the divisive politics that have served the GOP well elsewhere in the country. "The Republican Party in California will be a permanent minority party if we adopt that model," ..
and that seems to be OK with some folks here at FR. Go figure.
To: NormsRevenge
It's all in the capital "R": that means everything to many.
2
posted on
06/22/2006 9:19:00 AM PDT
by
Theodore R.
(Cowardice is forever!)
To: NormsRevenge
Well, at least they're Republicans... < /S >
To: NormsRevenge
A gay Republican is far less likely to push their "lifestyle" on you than a straight Democrat.
4
posted on
06/22/2006 9:20:44 AM PDT
by
oldleft
To: NormsRevenge
I miss the days where the term "openly gay" was unknown... And while the "tolerant" version of republicanism in California might meet some limited success, the same strategy nationwide will removed Republicans from any serious contention for any office.
5
posted on
06/22/2006 9:20:56 AM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of a Cancer on Society)
To: Jim Robinson
The writers of the hyper-conservative Free Republic Web Hear that, Jim? I need muh straightjacket man! And my padded cell before I go into convulsions here!
To: oldleft
A gay Republican is far less likely to push their "lifestyle" on you than a straight Democrat.Yes, they will tell you first before screwing you.
7
posted on
06/22/2006 9:23:42 AM PDT
by
Windsong
(Jesus Saves, but Buddha makes incremental backups)
To: NormsRevenge
Whatever happened to privacy? Why do people insist on defining themselves by their sexual proclivities?
8
posted on
06/22/2006 9:25:13 AM PDT
by
Tired of Taxes
(That's taxes, not Texas. I have no beef with TX. NJ has the highest property taxes in the nation.)
To: NormsRevenge
and that seems to be OK with some folks here at FR. Go figure. I don't understand what point you are making. It seems you are saying the Republicans should adopt Democrat platform planks to not be a minority party, but it's hard to tell if that is what you are saying.
9
posted on
06/22/2006 9:26:54 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: NormsRevenge
This is why I'm voting for the Real Deal, Angelides. Rinold is toast !
10
posted on
06/22/2006 9:27:11 AM PDT
by
John Lenin
(The RAT party is still Stuck on Stupid)
To: NormsRevenge; E-Mat
The writers of the hyper-conservative Free Republic Web site characterize the Log Cabin Republicans as "an [organization] shoving homosexual agendas on the GOP." For Patrosso's race in the AD 23, where he ran unopposed, Free Republic urged readers to either write in a candidate or not vote.
Hee-hee. Somebody's been paying attention to us. :-)
11
posted on
06/22/2006 9:31:52 AM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(The super-hyyyyyi-yi-yi-yi-yi-peractive Conservative!!!!!!!!!!)
To: oldleft
A gay Republican is far less likely to push their "lifestyle" on you than a straight Democrat.
That's absolutely right. They tend to be equally put-off by their own extremists.
LBT
-=-=-
12
posted on
06/22/2006 9:33:39 AM PDT
by
LiberalBassTurds
(There's nothing more pitiful than a retarded philosopher.)
To: NormsRevenge
and that seems to be OK with some folks here at FR. Go figure.
What do you call a republican who hires mostly democrats and adopts their agenda ? I call him a democrat.
13
posted on
06/22/2006 9:37:53 AM PDT
by
John Lenin
(The RAT party is still Stuck on Stupid)
To: NormsRevenge
Way to go FR. Anything else is a lesson in how to lose even if you win.
14
posted on
06/22/2006 9:42:07 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Tired of Taxes
Whatever happened to privacy? Why do people insist on defining themselves by their sexual proclivities?That is a question which is never answered and a complete and utter mystery other than the fact that they wish to compel others to accept their behavior. Beyond that there is no reason to disclose one's sexual activity.
What about a Republican K9 party? You know, Republican's who have sexual relations with their dog. Do they have special announcements for these people to run for office? Sheesh.
15
posted on
06/22/2006 9:43:06 AM PDT
by
Obadiah
(The beatings will continue until morale improves.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
(The super-hyyyyyi-yi-yi-yi-yi-peractive Conservative!!!!!}
Hilarious ;D!
16
posted on
06/22/2006 9:48:04 AM PDT
by
poobear
(The most critical job that Americans will not do (just illegals): Vote for Democrats!)
To: Tired of Taxes
Whatever happened to privacy? Why do people insist on defining themselves by their sexual proclivities?
They want to be considered
"Normal".
17
posted on
06/22/2006 10:00:56 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Wanna help kick some liberal arse? It's not just a job here at FR, IT's an obsession.)
To: tallhappy
I am simply saying there are supporters for the GLBT agenda here at FR and in the Ca GOP leadership and in the
New Majority who are pushing things down other folks throats in a quest for power, pure and simple.
18
posted on
06/22/2006 10:04:22 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Wanna help kick some liberal arse? It's not just a job here at FR, IT's an obsession.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
Well, at least the author didn't call us hyper-constipated. :-o
FR, a wholesome nutritional fiber for the sane masses.
Am I banned yet? lolol
19
posted on
06/22/2006 10:20:14 AM PDT
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi - Wanna help kick some liberal arse? It's not just a job here at FR, IT's an obsession.)
To: NormsRevenge; All
"John Laird, D-Santa Cruz"That's the Gay (BLEEP-BLEEPER) that authored that abomination that Schwartzenrenegger signed, called the "Sierra-Nevada CONservancy!"
What a horrific insult to all the conservatives in the huge Sierra-Nevada mountain range to be saddled with another layer of nonsensical government by a queer Commonist and a queer Commonist loving RINO Governor!!!
And you FReepers that keep thrusting your undying support of this on the rest of us are no better than they are!!!
20
posted on
06/22/2006 10:25:32 AM PDT
by
SierraWasp
(California is MEXIFORNIA , MANANA!!! The European settlers suffer from GANG-GREEN, TODAY!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson