Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stennis' New Missile System Right on Target [USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74)]
Navy NewsStand ^ | Journalist 2nd Class Christopher Gethings

Posted on 06/12/2006 6:41:54 PM PDT by SandRat

USS JOHN C. STENNIS, At Sea (NNS) -- As part of a weapons testing phase, USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) fired both of its new Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) systems at a remote-controlled drone for the first time, June 8.

The ship’s two RAM launchers each fired one missile at a BQM-34 Firebee drone, which was about four miles out and incoming and had been launched from Point Mugu, Calif. Both missiles successfully hit the infrared beacons the drone was carrying from its wings.

“They gave us a green light on both RAM missiles,” said Stennis’ Commanding Officer Capt. Brad Johanson at a debriefing after the missile launch. “The operator execution was outstanding.”

The RAMs were fired as part of a weeklong combat systems ship’s qualification trial (CSSQT) Stennis performed while at sea off the coast of California. The ship’s Close-in Weapons System (CIWS) and NATO Sea Sparrow Missile Systems (NSSMS) were also successfully fired.

“We really did hammer this off flawlessly,” said Johanson, referring to the successful completion of the CSSQT.

RAM was installed aboard Stennis during its docked-planned incremental availability period during 2005, and took the place of one of the ship’s CIWS mounts and one of its NSSMS mounts.

The new missile battery, which was co-developed by Germany and the United States, contains 21 chambers and can be fired at two-second intervals. RAM is a NATO-cooperative program and was designed to be a low-cost, lightweight quick-reaction self-defense system.

“RAM’s a lot cheaper than some of our other weapons systems,” said Fire Controlman 3rd Class Stacy Hernandez. “It’s really quite simple and it requires much less maintenance than our other systems.”

Unlike the CIWS and NSSMS, the RAM doesn’t have its own radar system. It uses Stennis’ new ship’s self-defense system (SSDS) for guidance, along with infrared and radio frequency tracking, so the missile becomes capable of tracking its target. SSDS was also installed during Stennis’ Docked Planned Incremental Availability period, and makes it possible for the ship to automate the detection and engagement of various threats at sea.

“The ship fired from the forward mount first, hitting one of the beacons the drone was carrying,” said Hernandez, who went to school for the new RAM in 2005. “Shortly afterward, the ship did a 180 degree turn and fired from the aft mount. Both were right on.”

Missiles fired by Stennis’ RAM system reach speeds in excess of Mach 2, twice the speed of sound, and have a range of about three miles.

“It’s very fast, very simple, and can be fired with little to no warning,” said Hernandez. “This thing does its job.”

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) personnel from Port Hueneme were aboard to prepare equipment and train personnel.

“I think it went excellent today,” said Kent Simmons, an in service engineering agent with NAVSEA. “All the training and the time these Sailors spent working all paid off today.”

Simmons called the event a success and added he’s been keeping the Sailors involved very busy.

For related news, visit the USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cvn74/.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: California
KEYWORDS: missile; righton; stennisnew; system; target; uss

1 posted on 06/12/2006 6:41:55 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74)


2 posted on 06/12/2006 6:42:17 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
I remember Stennis - but who's this fellow Firebee?
3 posted on 06/12/2006 6:48:33 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
How fast is the drone?
4 posted on 06/12/2006 6:58:14 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken; Carry_Okie

Your answers are here http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-34.html


5 posted on 06/12/2006 7:02:07 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

"How fast is the drone?"

I hope they have a Mach 3 version to simulate the cruise-missiles the Chicoms are using.


6 posted on 06/12/2006 7:21:36 PM PDT by neutronsgalore (Why are free-traders so blind to the assistance they’re providing our enemies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

“The ship fired from the forward mount first, hitting one of the beacons the drone was carrying,” said Hernandez, who went to school for the new RAM in 2005. “Shortly afterward, the ship did a 180 degree turn and fired from the aft mount. Both were right on.”

Wait a minute....the drone wasn't moving TOWARDS the ship? I guess perpendicular? I guess that's ok for initial testing. Otherwise the ship would have a hole in it by the time it turned around.


7 posted on 06/12/2006 7:27:32 PM PDT by neutronsgalore (Why are free-traders so blind to the assistance they’re providing our enemies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neutronsgalore
This drone does Mach 1.1-1.8
8 posted on 06/12/2006 8:10:02 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

"This drone does Mach 1.1-1.8"

Ok if you're simulating Silkworms. Hopefully they'll come up with a good simulation for Sunburns. They'll first need to consistently hit drones coming head-on.


9 posted on 06/12/2006 8:27:49 PM PDT by neutronsgalore (Why are free-traders so blind to the assistance they’re providing our enemies?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neutronsgalore
Ok if you're simulating Silkworms. Hopefully they'll come up with a good simulation for Sunburns.

Yup. That's why I asked.

10 posted on 06/12/2006 8:33:51 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Mark 31 launcher for the fire and forget Raytheon Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM).

Teledyne-Ryan AQM-34 Firebee RPV


11 posted on 06/12/2006 8:47:39 PM PDT by null and void (Thousands of geniuses live and die undiscovered -- either by themselves or by others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

12 posted on 06/12/2006 8:49:33 PM PDT by ajolympian2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neutronsgalore; Carry_Okie

Didn't the US buy a handful of (downgraded) KH-31 Krypton missiles from Russia for target practice in the mid 1990s??


13 posted on 06/12/2006 8:51:53 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ajolympian2004

Is that a full scale image?


14 posted on 06/12/2006 9:25:39 PM PDT by null and void (Thousands of geniuses live and die undiscovered -- either by themselves or by others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Geez, the RAM system has been in development for over 20 years. Good thing it has yet to be needed in action.

The IR part of the seeker was specifically intended for the Mach 2-3 Russki anti-ship missles. The get so hot they are an enormous heat target. Problem is a close-in kill, you still have a very large losd of supersonic buckshot coming your way.

15 posted on 06/13/2006 7:41:16 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The US has the coyote ramjet missile it uses to simulate sunburns. It just as fast and more advanced in terms of electronics.


16 posted on 06/13/2006 7:58:31 AM PDT by MARKUSPRIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson