Javier Solana, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin hug
each other during the Russia-EU summit at the Russian Black Sea
resort of Sochi, Thursday, May 25, 2006. (AP Photo/ Mikhail Metzel)
Posted on 05/28/2006 2:38:46 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
The chief of Russia's security council said Sunday that Russia opposes any use of force against Iran over its controversial nuclear program, the Iranian state-run television reported.
"Unlike the U.S., Russia believes Iran's nuclear program needs to be resolved only through dialogue. Any use of force will further complicate the issue and will cause tension in the region," Igor Ivanov was quoted as saying by the station.
Ivanov made the comments during a meeting with Iran's top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani.
Ivanov arrived in Tehran late Saturday to discuss Iran's contentious nuclear program, including incentives to be offered as a reward if the Islamic Republic suspends uranium enrichment and possible sanctions if it continues.
His visit took place as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov discussed Iran's nuclear standoff with U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on the phone, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry.
Ivanov's trip came ahead of a meeting of foreign ministers from six world powers scheduled next week to decide on a package of incentives for Iran to stop enriching uranium.
The five Security Council members _ the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France _ plus Germany appeared to have narrowed their differences on a package of rewards or sanctions for Iran during high-level talks in London on Wednesday.
Russia and China have opposed calls by the United States, Britain and France for a resolution that would threaten sanctions and be enforceable by military action if Iran does not give up enriching uranium.
But a compromise is emerging that would rule out military action and call for new consultations among the five permanent Security Council members on any further steps against Iran, diplomats said.
Iran has said it will not give up its right to enrich uranium and produce nuclear fuel as allowed by the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, to which it is a signatory.
The U.S. and some of its allies accuse Tehran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to produce nuclear weapons. Tehran has denied this, saying its nuclear program is merely to generate electricity.
Iran announced April 11 that it had enriched uranium for the first time, using 164 centrifuges. Enrichment can produce either fuel for a nuclear reactor or material for a warhead _ but tens of thousands of centrifuges are needed to do either on a large scale.
Iran intends to move toward large-scale uranium enrichment involving 3,000 centrifuges by late 2006, and then expand the program to 54,000 centrifuges.
But Iran's media quoted Iran's ambassador to the U.N., Javad Zarif, as saying Sunday that Tehran could limit enrichment as a way to resolve the mounting crisis with the West.
"We will agree to limited enrichment," the daily Etemad Melli, or National Confidence, quoted Zarif as saying.
Golly gee... You coulda knocked me over with a feather.
What are the chances the Iranian nuclear program manuals are translated from Russian?
Of course they oppose force against Iran's nuclear program. They are running the damn thing.
This is only because the Russians are still making money off of Iran for their program.
The moment that money well dries up, the Russians will drop them as fast as they possibly can.
Well gee... why don't they use the same policy against Chechnya then?
No, really? I deduced that when they sold them ack-ack batteries.
Well gosh whiz, Opie. Couldn't you tell 'em any more plain like that they got nothin to fear from you?
From Russia: "Gee, they're such a good customer of ours.....wouldn't want that market to go away now would we?"
If Russia is running Iran's nuclear program it's only a matter of time before it melts down. I believe France and Germany are the ones building Iran's nukes.
But what do I know?
You're probably right.
Nope. It is a much deeper affinity, on the level "birds of feather flock together". In '79 they took the same position over the embassy hostages.
Different Russia.
Whether or not you believe it or not, Russia needs money now and fast.
Iran has that.
With the current oil and gas prices their need for money is somewhat less acute than "now and fast". And as for "different Russia" - heartfelt thanks for the best laugh of my day. Coca-Cola being sold in groceries does not make for a different country.
ok.
And if things REALLY heat up, as in, we are telling them that things will stop now, we are massing troops on their borders, Russia will walk away.
If you don't believe me, just look at what happened to Iraq.
Iran is killing our soldiers in Iraq with IED's. That blood is on Russia's hands.
...And esplaaaane it to me again why we should care?
To paraphrase Belly-button Girl....Hey, Russia! You shut the hell up. We'll protect civilization.
We all know Putin's true color... Red!
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.