UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS-(corrected)

4.30.06 | Mia T

[freema]

Actually, no. Hadn't thought to check, I'd never had a problem before. But now none of them will work, so I'll got to the next post and reload.

[Mia T]

let me know how it goes. :)

[Mia T]

I think United 93 demonstrated to bin Laden and his followers that the clintons and the left are an aberration: Americans will not "just sit here and do nothing...."

(Recall what bin Laden said about clinton/Somalia and the American troops in 1998, right before he bombed the embassies.)

Bin Laden was emboldened by the 8 years of the clintons' feckless and corrupt action and feckless and corrupt inaction....

[freema]

It says Macromedia is now a part of Adobe. And Adobe hates my guts. And, my computer says my security will not permit me to download. I don't know what happened, I could click the pics fine yesterday!

[Mia T]

I am using a mac and osx, but this probably applies to you, too.

did you follow this instruction?
'Installation of Macromedia Flash Player may require administrative access to your PC, which is normally provided by your IT department. For the installation to succeed, you will be asked to close all open browser windows during the installation.'

[Mia T]

How did it go?

[Sic Luceat Lux]

bttt

[Gail Wynand]

Malfeasence as well as nonfeasence underlies each grotesque death, each terrible moment of agony and horror on or because of 9/11, including Flight 93.

The Gorelick Wall, a delusional non-constitutional self imposed institutional amnesia, the suppression of the ABLE DANGER information and methodology, which specifically identifed several members of the 9/11 conspiracy in advance, are examples of this malfeasence.

The major media continue to conspire in averting and diverting attention from these destructive actions that have direct causual links to the losses of 9/11. The heroism of 9/11's flight 93 passengers demonstrates that given the right information, average americans did and would make heroic choices, demonstating the media's role in subduing support of aggressive action against the perpetrators of 9/11 by hiding relevant facts is critical and vital to the lefts ongoing efforts to sabotage U.S. policy and efforts in Iraq Afghanistan and elsewhere against the organized efforts of Islamic Radicals to kill innocents around the world.

[Mia T]

Excellent take!
The media--off with their heads, yes!

But malfeasance and nonfeasance exist on the right, too.
The Bush bully pulpit, inexplicably, lies dormant (bush is lousy at this, but he can delegate, can't he?)
and the DC gasbags on the right (professional pols all) are too busy protecting their left flank and rear to comment.
(We have to start fielding and electing what the Founders had in mind--citizen politicians.)

Reverse Gorelick

by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)

thanx to Fixit for the audio

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

 

 

 

e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation that the Wall was cover for clinton corruption:

• Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  
• Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect....

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.

The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998

 

Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support the thesis that the Wall was cover for international clinton crimes.

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)

[Mia T]

 

ON WARRANTLESS SEARCHES AND WIRETAPS:
THE ABYSMAL CONSTITUTIONAL RECORD OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON
(and this report covers only term #1)

I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon constitutions, upon laws and upon courts. These are false hopes; believe me, these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it; no constitution, no law, no court can even do much to help it.

LEARNED HAND

Since there are occasions when every vessel will break from her moorings, and since, if she does, she becomes a menace to those about her; the owner's duty, as in other similar situations, to provide against resulting injuries is a function of three variables: (1) The probability that she will break away; (2) the gravity of the resulting injury, if she does; (3) the burden of adequate precautions. Possibly it serves to bring this notion into relief to state it in algebraic terms: if the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B<PL.

LEARNED HAND
United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
159 F.2d 169 (2d Cir. 1947)

 

deconstructing clinton… "just because I could"


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!

 

Two Washington pundits are warning that Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential plans may depend on whether congressional Democrats can continue to keep Independent Counsel David Barrett's final report on IRS abuses during the 1990s under wraps.

READ MORE

 

 

 

REDACTION LOOPHOLE: ACCESS TO THE BARRETT REPORT

 

by Mia T, 01.20.06  

he judges who redacted 120 pages of the Barrett report have, if not a sense of justice, a sense of humor. In their rulings, they provide a mechanism by which the people can see the redactions, but for which at least one honest, selfless, courageous member of Congress is required.

READ MORE

[Mia T]

The actual.

[jla]

The actual.

No, I haven't, I'll probably will wait on the DVD.

(the rain chased be back inside, though when it has passed it'll have helped to expedite my grass plug planting.)

[tcrlaf]

I've got MANY different Libs on other boards trying to explain how Flight 93 is all a LIE, and that BUSH shot the plane down.....

How the hell do bring REALITY to these people???

[Cincinna]

It is disgraceful to see once again what a foolish, irresponsible and weak President Clinton was.

Under no circumstances should he be given a 3rd term. Never forget "buy one, get one free".

[Gail Wynand]

The kool-aid drinkers will not change their minds. If widely viewed the movie United 93 will help connect the Great American Public ("GAP") with reality, at least for a while.

The national anthem should be played each evening on every TV station in the US at signoff (do they still have signoffs?) or after the late, late show, against a back drop of the people jumping out of the twin towers on 9/11. It should be done until we have won the war against Islamic Totalitarianism.

[Mia T]

bump!

I would add pathological, treasonous, inept and corrupt to your list. What unmitigated gall of these two grotesqueries to even contemplate a sequel.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

thanks again :)

[Mia T]

United 93 is very un-Hollywood.
Spielberg could take some lessons from Greengrass.

CLOSE ENCOUNTER OF THE WORST KIND

January 9, 2006
Reviewer: miat22 (Mia T)

... to borrow a phrase, perversely, from a Spielberg flick about benign intelligence.

Munich, with its false premises, phony pieties and outright lies -- Spielberg fantasy wrapped in sober documentary -- is a verisimilitudinous contrivance that is pernicious, especially now, especially here, especially if we understand Spielberg's real motivation.

Truth matters not at all to Spielberg, and courage matters even less. To advance his fallacious argument, he has Golda Meir speak words she never said, never would have said and, obviously, cannot now disavow. Posthumous misappropriation is a preferred tactic of the abject coward.

Munich is less about Meir avenging the Munich massacre than it is about Bush waging the War on Terror. The historical Munich allusion of appeasement, self-loathing and psychologizing that is practiced so fastidiously by the American Left today is key to understanding Spielberg.

The core of his anti-war argument: By fighting back, we become our enemy. Ironically, with Munich, the same can now be said of Spielberg.

Is Spielberg humanizing the terrorist really any different from Riefenstahl humanizing Hitler? If anything, Spielberg is more contemptible. Whereas Riefenstahl symbolizes the naïve actress and director who is induced to deal with devils, Spielberg is self-actuated and aware.

Hollywood is DreamWorks, fantastical and unthinking and solipsistic by definition.

To mitigate its danger, people capable of critical thinking must take on Hollywood... and must do so in Hollywood venues.

The printed word, sad to say, no longer carries the day.



My New York Times Review of Munich
Was this review helpful to you?
VOTE HERE

 

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2006