Posted on 04/28/2006 3:10:52 PM PDT by fishtank
Now try and guess again which side of the issue I am leaning toward...good luck.
Right, and amnesty for criminals is the way to promote border control?
Bad guess..pick another.
That was with a question mark, as in, is this what you believe? Oh, I get it, you would agree to a criminal felon to be able to bribe his way to freedom. Just the way they do it in Mexico, the hellhole of a sewer that the criminals are leaving in order to subvert and deconstruct that which they can not appreciate as they can not create such a civilization.
Get them out, period.
You have one last guess..make it good.
*crickets*
They need to be deported if they don't come forward..we need to build the wall. And for those CHRISTIANS who want to swear allegiance to American and become true US citizens they can pay a fine and then wait out their time like the rest of us did and then become fine hard working Republicans.
As for the companies that you so conveniently left out, whilst vilifying all the Mexicans....you know the hosts of the show?....the one's that perpetrated all this mess?....they need to be brought out as the subversive trouble makers that they are. Penalties,fines, bankruptcy..you name it.
I'm tired of the "It's just those "evil" Mexicans fault" baloney twenty four seven.
Who is paying for all this propaganda? The Dems. It's perfect..they get to employ Mexicans, treat Mexicans like dirt, and then when the jig is up, they can blame the Mexicans. Sounds like a perfect plan for the modern day slave driver to me.
Sure...deport...don't vilify or you are playing into the enemie's hand.
Savage has no objectivity on Rush, Sean or OReilly... and that is what always causes me to switch the dial, I want to hear something other than Hush Limbaugh, Vannity, etc...
he said today on his show that he has been undergoing random drug screening for two years now and isn't worried about more in the future.
Exactly...
But don't give too much credit to Savage either, lest ye forget they're both in the same business.
But seriously, was anyone surprised Rush was on drugs? Did anybody think he wasn't on drugs?
Yep.
"was anyone surprised Rush was on drugs? Did anybody think he wasn't on drugs?"
Nothing about Rush gives the impression he’s on drugs. Your comment places your general argument well outside the boundaries of sensible debate.
That means you are accompanied by leftists who hate Rush because his thinking beats theirs exponentially—leftists for whom idiocy and cowardice are the only option available.
Not at all.
He's a radio personality, he's in media, and he has an audience of millions...
I'd say 80% or more people in the business with those ratings are on drugs. Maybe that's naive or it might seem asinine but I've seen it happen so much that when they found out Rush was on drugs, it didn't surprise me at all.
It didn't surprise me that liberals would make a huge deal out of it either, I mean, it's not like he was the mayor of a city and caught smoking crack... and... then... re-elected... Jesus...
Get my drift?
"Get my drift?"
Your drift is that you assumed Rush was “on drugs” –that he did it the way highly paid entertainers do it—in the form of white lines on the coffee table or pills doled out at parties. You were wrong. Rush became dependent on prescription medications. This distinction is not beyond your understanding.
Liberals made a huge deal of it for the reason I explained earlier: they hate Rush because their nearly two decades of attacks against him have only sucked them deeper into the cesspool, that wasteland of slanted news stories and forged documents where they slither and squirm while Rush provides a medium for us to see them for the fools they have become.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.