Posted on 04/17/2006 4:56:51 PM PDT by Pharmboy
I wonder how they knew what color to paint it.
Mega-dinosaur ping...
Whatever they had leftover when they renovated the cafeteria...
:)
That thing must have really rocked the Ark.
Think it could swim?
I'd hate walking into the stable and seeing this thing inside.
"Hey, honey! Roll out the howitzer. There's a Spinosaurus in the barn eating the horse."
The same two legged dino? - bottom LHS.
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-acambaro-dinos.htm
Q. What's harder than getting a pregnant Mapusaurus onto the ark?
A. Getting a Mapusaurus pregnant on the ark!
[Noah! Make them stop! I'm getting seasick!]
Some details about huge old dinosaurs are best not revealed!!
Oh geez...am I glad I saw that an hour after I ate.
Godzilla | A real Dinosaur |
Please pick up a basic children's biology book before the next time you try and plant something
There's no need to take that insulting tone. I simply posted the second pic of the figurine to act as a comparison to the illustration of a two-legged 'dinosaur' on the Ica Stone. Take it or leave it. The question remains open. How old are the stones and who created them?
Your response is insulting and below the standard of enquiry one expects from a Freeper.
Correctly drawn today
Now we know much more. For example, ossified tendons in the tail indicate that the tail did not droop but stood out straight.
Correctly sculpted by ancient peoples.
The clay figurine (below right) is from the Pre-classical Chupicuaro Culture (800 B.C. to 200 A.D.) found near Acambaro, Guanajuato, Mexico. It seems obvious these people knew how Iguanodons appeared in life.
Wrong number and kind of toes for a dinosaur, among other things. One of the other things is that the critter in the image has no hind legs. It would be walking on its hands.
?????
Scientific evidence for creation and co-existence of humans and dinosaurs? Young earth evidence? Sorry, some tens of thousand scientists say you are wrong.
Radiometric dating? Give me a break! Radiocarbon dating alone disproves the young earth claims; no need for dating rocks, fossils, or any of the rest. Lets just talk about dating soils and what lies in them. If you have a problem with this, go to your creation websites and see if you can find some examples of why the radiocarbon dates I have personally obtained, going back some 13,000 years, on western US soils are incorrect. I have dates on human populations nearly that old. And my colleagues go back even older.
ps. The creation sites are not going to help much, as they are still fighting the wrong battles, arguing about fossils and geology. We are talking soils here! You're on your own, kid; think or swim!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.