Posted on 04/15/2006 3:06:10 AM PDT by Gengis Khan
You are very confused. Pol Pot was a Maoist. The person one should compare to Pol Pot is Prachanda, the mass murderer whom "democratic" communists like you support against the King. You are the one who needs to be posting over at DU.
As for nazis, I find your accusation ironic considering you are one of the few LUNATICS psychotic enough to defend both the SOVIETS and the NAZIS. Here's proof:
"The Brits were our enemies. Yes if the Nazis kicked their @sses then yes I enjoyed it." - 61 posted on 05/09/2005 3:33:19 PM CDT by Gengis Khan
So you'll pretty much side with anybody as long as they kill the "English-speakers" you so despise.
For now the whole world is watching how a blood thirsty King is killing civilians and brutally suppressing freedom.
By the "the whole world" of course you mean the MSM, the UN, Amnesty International, the State Department, Jimmy Carter, etc, etc...
Your country "supports" Taiwan by supplying China with nuclear technology and weaponry, by giving MFN status, by setting up Walmart all across US and by relocating all manufacturing industries to China.
The USA has sworn to defend Taiwan if they are attacked by the reds. Japan has now joined us in this pledge. I guess you're more concerned about outsourcing to China, because you prefer outsourcing to India. At the same time India is massively increasing its trade with China.
And your country also supported Tibet right?
In fact the first CIA agent killed in the line of duty was killed in Tibet. http://www.intotibet.info/aboutthebook.html The CIA helped Tibetan guerrillas fight the Chi-coms for decades, but the USA doesn't share a border with Tibet like India does. Where was India to stop the conquest of Tibet? India was busy siding with Communism per Nehru's "Non-alignment" -- in other words, kissing China's ass! That's what you can't grasp. India was on the wrong side of history. Now you're wrong again and you can't accept it because you refuse to admit your mistakes. You want to "spread democracy" so bad how come India doesn't speak up for democracy in Burma? Maybe Nepal will be treated better by India when they too are a Chinese client like Burma. 'Free Tibet' push fades as India-China ties warm
Your support for Musharraf makes you an enemy of India and an anti-India.
No, President Bush's support for Musharraf makes YOU an enemy of my President and my nation. I take my nation's enemies seriously and I like them to be dealt with severely.
you have no problem whatsoever if the King exterminates women and children.
Again, you are confused, it is your "hero of the people" Prachanda who slaughters women and babes. Only in your schizophrenia do you project his crimes upon his archenemy. What about all the Hindus who are slaughtered yearly by Prachanda and his bloodthirsty gang? You don't speak for India and you sure don't speak for Hindus, most of whom support the King.
The Freepers who know you as a Paki scum arn't wrong at all.
Such as whom? The only person who ever told this lie about me was the VOICE OF MOSCOW, the rabid Russian propagandist who's been banned. Sooner or later you will get the ZOT too for the anti-American lies you push here.
Your antipathy towards Hindu right wing and in general towards India is well known on FR.
Wrong. I am known for my antipathy for the Indian left wing. I prefer the BJP and always have, but what do you care about the truth, you are to busy making up lies about me. You are the one who would support India's policies regardless of whether they are left or right, because you are a chauvinist.
So the BJP (Hindu right wing) who were against the deal are anti-Americans eh? So how come are you supporting the BJP?
I care alot more about the war against the communists in Nepal than about India's business deals. If India would rather be friends with the Ayatollahs determined to wipe Israel from the map, and be dependent on a pipeline controlled by Pakistan, then go right ahead, be my guest. You won't screw us, just yourselves.
So I take it you have no problems with the anti-conversion law and missionaries being kicked out.
Indian Christians will have much bigger problems if the Maoists take Nepal and complete the first phase of their plan to establish a "revolutionary zone" in India. India stood by when the Reds practically wiped out Buddhism in Tibet, why do you want this fate for the Hindus of Nepal and India as well as the Christians? Communism is deadly to all.
You have no idea about true "conservatism".
Where I come from, conservatives are anti-communist. You are the supporting a communist cause, thus you are the one who is not conservative and has no idea what it means to be conservative.
[it is really you who serves the Pakistani agenda by providing aid and comfort to Pakistan and China's Naxalite and Maoist proxies. You are a traitor to India. Further you support Pakistan's plan to make India dependent on Iranian gas with your communist-islamic "Peace Pipeline."]
Fact is you still gives Pakistan military and monetary aid. And you support Musharraf and all his activities. As I said you are the Paki scumbag.
Wrong. I support only American cooperation with them in the War on Terror. You see, I am not an Indian and have no loyalty at all to India, therefore I cannot betray India. Siding with my own country instead of yours only makes me a Pakistani in your demented mind.
I stand by every word I have ever said
You stand by Soviet apologies, Marxist pseudo-history, nazi sympathies and dhimmitude. You are a sick puppy.
You hit bulls eye there. Never ever..Never ever..Never ever trust a Commie. There is no such thing as a good or a peaceful Commie. Ask those millions of ghosts in siberia or in china.
India as you correctly pointed out is guilty of NOT fighting back. The maoists and the slammies are a big threat to peace in that region.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.