Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican race for Cunningham's seat remains up in the air
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 4/12/06 | Allison Hoffman - ap

Posted on 04/12/2006 5:48:59 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2006 5:49:02 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; doodlelady

Brian Bilbray PING!


2 posted on 04/12/2006 5:49:36 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Ya never know.

10,000 last-minute absentee and provisional ballots were being tallied


3 posted on 04/12/2006 5:50:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (May 1st: PINKO DE MAYO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

ALL the votes should have been counted by now.


4 posted on 04/12/2006 5:52:03 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I hear ya,, 10,000?


5 posted on 04/12/2006 5:52:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (May 1st: PINKO DE MAYO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; Torie; newzjunkey

fyi


6 posted on 04/12/2006 5:53:16 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (May 1st: PINKO DE MAYO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What the hell is going on?
One by one by hand?
Cripes...lol.


7 posted on 04/12/2006 5:53:16 PM PDT by onyx (It's easier to indict a ham sandwich or Tom DeLay than it is to indict a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Hmmm...so it's not QUITE set yet?


8 posted on 04/12/2006 5:54:57 PM PDT by b9 ("the [evil Marxist liberal socialist Democrat Party] alternative is unthinkable" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The winner of the June runoff will ... immediately begin campaigning for November.

How do they know for sure that the GOP nominee in the special election runoff will also win the primary election?


Devereux didn't rule out the possibility that Roach might attempt a write-in campaign in the June runoff if he finishes behind Bilbray.

Why bother with a write-in? If the writer, Allison Hoffman, had taken the time to check the Secretary of State's website here, she would have seen that Roach is among the 12 GOP candidates qualified for the Primary. All 12, plus 2 other Republicans, ran yesterday.


Maverick City Councilwoman Donna Frye's write-in bid for mayor in 2004 outpolled incumbent Dick Murphy, but a judge gave Murphy the victory when he tossed out more than 5,500 ballots on which voters wrote Frye's name but failed to darken the adjoining bubble.

Distortion. Frye tried to be a write-in candidate in a runoff election. She exhorted people to fill in the bubble and write in her name. She knew a voter's intent cannot be divined if they don't bother to mark the bubble. Also, what's the point of holding a runoff if new candidates can run in the runoff without competing (or spending money) in the first election?

9 posted on 04/12/2006 6:01:47 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; EternalVigilance; SD Republican; goldstategop; Recovering_Democrat; fieldmarshaldj

What is more worrisome is the the candidates who didn't win this primary will still be on the ballot for the regular primary on June 6. So whoever won this primary (probably Brian Bilbray) will still be subject to negative ads by his Republican primary opponents.

This gives Francine Busby an opportunity she normally wouldn't have.


10 posted on 04/12/2006 6:01:58 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Fourteen Republicans. Whatta political party!!

The dem gets 44% and the highest finisher of the 14 Republicans gets 15%.

That has got to inspire great confidence in the minds of the party in California.


11 posted on 04/12/2006 6:02:55 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
One by one by hand?

For provisional ballots, definitely one-by-one, because they need to check the provisional voters' eligibility before the votes can be counted.

12 posted on 04/12/2006 6:03:16 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; AntiGuv; LdSentinal; calcowgirl; ...

My concern now, despite the overall turnout for the GOP, is that there are going to be a number of voters whom will simply refuse to vote for the RINO Bilbray. His mindset and ideology are a SMALL percentage of the GOP base in this district.

It may be best, alas, to urge Kaloogian, Morrow, and the other trailing Conservative Republicans to endorse Roach in the upcoming primary. Bilbray for the short, Roach for the long. Short term RINO pain for long-term Conservative gain.


13 posted on 04/12/2006 6:09:02 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: onyx
ALL the votes should have been counted by now.

Have you ever sat through absentee and provisional ballot processing? It will take several days at a minimum.

14 posted on 04/12/2006 6:15:21 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This gives Francine Busby an opportunity she normally wouldn't have.

Not in this district. Bilbray can afford to take some pounding at the sidelines. No Democrat can win in this seat.

15 posted on 04/12/2006 6:17:25 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
My concern now, despite the overall turnout for the GOP, is that there are going to be a number of voters whom will simply refuse to vote for the RINO Bilbray

Don't worry about that. Even if the very worst were to happen June 6th (which it can't). She would only serve from June 7th until the House adjourns this year, since the winner of the June primary will face her ALONE in November and beat her then.

If the house is close this fall, this seat won't be one of the turnovers. It will ALWAYS go REP in November.

Keep your eye on the ball.

16 posted on 04/12/2006 6:22:04 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Howard Kaloogian and Bill Morrow have worked the political trenches for years. Such people are normally loathe to support a wealthy newcomer whom they regard as a dilletante with too much time on his hands.


17 posted on 04/12/2006 6:22:16 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: onyx; NormsRevenge; fieldmarshaldj

Each late absentee ballot must have its signature and eligibility verified, and the handful of provisional ballots the same. That takes time. But the result will not change. Roach and Bilbray got 29% of the vote between them, and assuming they get about the same share of the remaining ballots between them, that is 2900 votes (i.e., 29% of 10,000 ballots (if all are legit, which they won't be). That means that Roach needs to get 65.2% of those 2900 ballots to take the lead. That isn't going to happen. As I said, it's over.


18 posted on 04/12/2006 6:25:36 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
What is more worrisome is the the candidates who didn't win this primary will still be on the ballot for the regular primary on June 6.

That's right. They cannot withdraw their names.

So whoever won this primary (probably Brian Bilbray) will still be subject to negative ads by his Republican primary opponents.
This gives Francine Busby an opportunity she normally wouldn't have.

Hopefully some candidates with lower percentages will endorse Roach or Bilbray for the Primary, thus keeping the campaign cleaner, but even if it's a dirty campaign I really doubt Busby can pick up any significant number of Republican votes, especially because most non-Bilbray votes were for more conservative candidates (Roach, Kaloogian, Morrow, etc.).

19 posted on 04/12/2006 6:31:47 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: heleny; ElkGroveDan; fieldmarshaldj

True, but there is yet another factor which hasn't been discussed. Democrats have a spirited primary for Governor and most of the downballot state offices. By contrast, the GOP only has a few competitive statewide primaries, none of them high-profile.

That means that registered Democrats will be more motivated to vote in the June 6 primary.


20 posted on 04/12/2006 6:39:33 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson