Posted on 03/24/2006 2:18:56 AM PST by abu afak
WASHINGTON - A prominent Harvard law professor, Alan Dershowitz, is alleging that the authors of a Harvard Kennedy School paper about the "Israel lobby," one of which is the Kennedy School's academic dean, culled sections of the paper from neo-Nazi and other anti-Israel hate Web sites.
"What we're discovering first of all is that the quotes that they use are not only wrenched out of context, but they are the common quotes that appear on hate sites," Mr. Dershowitz, who is identified in the paper as part of the "lobby," told The New York Sun yesterday.
"The wrenching out of context is done by the hate sites,and then [the authors] cite them to the original sources, in order to disguise the fact that they've gotten them from hate sites."
The paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," was written by the Kennedy School's Stephen Walt and a political science professor and the codirector of the Program on International Security Policy at the University of Chicago, John Mearsheimer, and published by the Kennedy School.
In the 83-page "working paper," the professors suggest that a vast network of journalists, think tanks, lobbyists, and largely Jewish officials have seized the foreign policy debate and manipulated America to invade Iraq.
The paper has drawn sharp criticism from prominent Harvard faculty, Harvard students, and a member of Congress, with many critics alleging that the document is riddled with factual inaccuracies and suffers from bias and faulty research..."
(Excerpt) Read more at nysun.com ...
it's all in the Protocols, you know. /sarc
Need we any more proof that the lunatics have taken seige of the asylum?
KAAA-PINNNNGGGG
As opposed to the vast network of journalists who believe Israel is guilty of war crimes and that suicide bombers are freedom fighters.
---------------------------
Hate sites are the best, often only, sources for these things.
Just a bit of nitpicking about an important story, but why can't they find reporters who can write basic English. It is "one of whom", not "one of which."
See this page conveniently removed from Harvard University server, but saved on google
A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. Even when hiding behind accademic credentials.
A college degree, even from an Ivy League School, is rapidly gaining the prestige of a Nobel Peace Prize. :-)
LOL. That is true...unfortunately.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
failure to grasp the basic logic of the language is a matter of concern; and professional incompetence is certainly not limited to journalism.
all that said, in haste I've come up with some pitiful grammar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.