Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco City Government Calls Catholics 'Hateful, Discriminatory, Insulting, Ignorant'
Life Site ^ | 03.22.06 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 03/22/2006 7:40:27 PM PST by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last
To: nmh
Why is it that the left consistently calls their opposition exactly what THEY ARE?

It's called Projection. i.e accusing others of what you are guilty of.

41 posted on 03/22/2006 8:17:05 PM PST by rllngrk33 (The RATs and Media are the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"It is an insult to all San Franciscans when a foreign country, like the Vatican, meddles with and attempts to negatively influence this great city's existing and established customs and traditions, such as the right of same-sex couples to adopt and care for children in need."

Since when is the Vatican a country? Must have happened while I was sleeping.

42 posted on 03/22/2006 8:17:49 PM PST by calex59 (seeing the light shouldn't make you go blind and, BTW, Stå sammen med danskerne !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski; D.P.Roberts

I'm sure D.P. was responding to the article. He just posted it to Coleus because that's who posted the article!


43 posted on 03/22/2006 8:19:01 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nmh

It's called projection.


44 posted on 03/22/2006 8:19:25 PM PST by highlander_UW (I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

Awesome, I love it when my enemies show their biggotry. The Catholic Church is strong. These weak pansies are a part of a passing fad.


45 posted on 03/22/2006 8:19:45 PM PST by Porterville (Sure are a lot of these few Muslim Extremist Fanatics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
San Francisco City Government Calls Catholics 'Hateful, Discriminatory, Insulting, Ignorant'

In the good old days they would have laid an interdiction on San Francisco.

46 posted on 03/22/2006 8:22:14 PM PST by Mike Darancette (In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Vatican City is it's own state.
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/vt.html

Not sticking up for SF just clarifying the issue for you.


47 posted on 03/22/2006 8:22:51 PM PST by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Maybe they should change the name of their city then. Saint Francis (English for "San Francisco") is unlikely to have been in favor of gay adoption, gay love or anything involving homosexuality.

I guess hey could call it Sodom on the Bay? And that town across the bay could be Gomorrah.

That's the ticket.

48 posted on 03/22/2006 8:23:10 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

"While many city's residents agree with the Church's stand against homosexual adoption, the resolution stated "It is an insult to all San Franciscans when a foreign country, like the Vatican, meddles with and attempts to negatively influence this great city's existing and established customs and traditions, such as the right of same-sex couples to adopt and care for children in need.""

1. The ban on homosexuality is much, much older than San Francisco. The Vatican has precedence.
2. It is an insult to all Americans when a rebellious city meddles with attempts to negatively influence this great nations's existing and established customs and traditions, SUCH AS THE FREEDOM TO WORSHIP (or not) AS YOU CHOOSE!


49 posted on 03/22/2006 8:26:40 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: marsh_of_mists

"Surely, this is a joke? How do they always manage to outdo themselves, time after time after time? Cardinal Levada isn't representing San Francisco, you morons; he is representing the doctrines of the Catholic Church to the world. Nor is the Church trying to "meddle" in your precious hedonistic, bacchanal "values, customs, and traditions"; it is only trying to promote what it believes is the truth. "

Exactly. They are trying to force catholic charities to defy catholic teaching by making them place children with same sex couples.
It is similar to attempts to force catholic hospitals to perform abortions and prescribe contraception.

If they want to place children in the homes of same sex couples, they should form their own adoption agency.
I'm guessing most mothers-to-be would prefer to work through the catholic agency.

Similarly, patients who go to a catholic hospital shouldn't expect an abortion, or a prescription for the pill. They can go to other hospitals for that.


51 posted on 03/22/2006 8:31:05 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: D.P.Roberts

And I apologize for my confusion. I am sleep deprived.


52 posted on 03/22/2006 8:31:13 PM PST by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: calex59

"Since when is the Vatican a country? Must have happened while I was sleeping."

Vatican City is considered to be an autonomous nation-state.


53 posted on 03/22/2006 8:32:28 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

"If they want to place children in the homes of same sex couples, they should form their own adoption agency.
I'm guessing most mothers-to-be would prefer to work through the catholic agency."

Yes, which is exactely why they won't do that, of course. They know they can't actually compete in the realm of ideas, so they try to either shut down the ideological competition or intimidate it into capitulating.


54 posted on 03/22/2006 8:34:53 PM PST by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"It is an insult to all San Franciscans when a foreign country, like the Vatican, meddles with and attempts to negatively influence this great city's existing and established customs and traditions, such as the right of same-sex couples to adopt and care for children in need."

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Of course this SF city government-approved public display is not offensive to anyone. They're just some dudes showing their "pride" and having some "bareback" fun. And the politicians fall all over themselves to get a prominent spot in the parade.

55 posted on 03/22/2006 8:37:10 PM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
"voted unanimously Tuesday to approve a non-binding resolution blasting the Catholic Church for its opposition to homosexual adoption."


These idiots actually took the time to make a resolution, and vote on it, to blast the Catholic Church?? DO these people have no real work to do? Is there no crime in the streets? No potholes to be filled, stop lights to install, no schools in need of repair?? They have time to sit around and whine and help activists protest the Bible and the Catholic Church? Time to dissolve this city government if that's all they can do with their time.

A Church has a doctrine they live by and are governed by. A Church doctrine derives from the Bible. You can't picket and protest God. OK you CAN, but it will get you nowhere, except contemned. You idiots in this "city government" do not dictate Church doctrine, and you have no jurisdiction to try.
56 posted on 03/22/2006 8:39:04 PM PST by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marsh_of_mists

"Yes, which is exactely why they won't do that, of course. They know they can't actually compete in the realm of ideas, so they try to either shut down the ideological competition or intimidate it into capitulating."

It would be instinctive for most biological mothers to think "I want my baby in a home with a mother and a father"

I would think the thought of a baby possibly winding up with a same sex couple would cause the mom to rethink adoption. It would lead to less babies for couples who want to adopt.


57 posted on 03/22/2006 8:39:21 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Me either, Mears. Yet they haven't had homosexual marriage forced on them yet either, while we have.

Someday, a move south is in order, hopefully.


58 posted on 03/22/2006 8:40:33 PM PST by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lindaUSA
My husband and I are horrified by how ignorant, and seeminly stupid most of the hate filled messages are..... everyone needs to be filled with the peace of the Lord

Isn't it interesting that you signed up tomorrow but you felt compelled to burden us unwashed ignorant heathens with your brilliance today?

59 posted on 03/22/2006 8:43:11 PM PST by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nmh
two words

Projection
Transference
60 posted on 03/22/2006 8:43:20 PM PST by gidget7 (PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson