Posted on 02/24/2006 10:14:46 AM PST by presidio9
Every now and then, Hillary Clinton lifts the curtain and gives the world a peek at her real views. It's not pretty.
New York's junior senator spoke this week to the South Bronx Overall Economic Development Corp., raising the issue of tax-funded school vouchers — which many reformers see as a key tool, one that gives parents immediate alternatives to public schools that are failing to educate their kids.
Now, vouchers face a major obstacle in New York: The state constitution's Blaine Amendment arguably bans sending public funds to parochial schools.
Then there' the implacable opposition to vouchers of the United Federation of Teachers and its Albany-based parent, New York State United Teachers — politically potent unions that are entrenched in the failed status quo.
Any alternative to the present system is anathema to the unions and their bought-and-paid-for political minions.
However vouchers have succeeded in Milwaukee, Cleveland and parts of Florida — even if the unions claim that they simply take away precious resources from the public schools.
Hillary could have used that approach — dishonest as the argument may be.
But no, she had to go one step further.
One major demagogic step further.
Hillary waved the specter that vouch- ers would lead to a publicly-funded racist "School of the Church of the White Supremacist" or a radical Muslim "School of the Jihad."
"I won't stand for it," she added.
Of course she wouldn't.
No one would.
Certainly the hypersensitivity that informs public debate in New York and the nation is such that a hate academy of the sort Clinton conjures wouldn't last 10 seconds on the public dime.
-snip-
Nearly 60 percent of New York City eighth-graders can't pass eighth-grade state math tests, despite the incremental progress of the Bloomberg regime. -snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Uglier? Is that even possible?
She gets any 'uglier' they are gonna have to redefine the word ugly...
There's new standard in town...
Watch the movie here.
She is nuts.
"School of the Church of the White Supremacist"
OK WHAT CHURCH IS THIS?
"Now, vouchers face a major obstacle in New York: The state constitution's Blaine Amendment arguably bans sending public funds to parochial schools. "
So parents cannot get vouchers to send their children to a parochial school, however, even if they are presently sending their child to paraochial school they have to still pay property taxes for public education.
Subtle demonization of the mythical "Christian Right."
Didn't you know? All of us who go to church regularly are secretly racists.
At my parish, if it isn't Easter or Christmas (when the riff-raff shows up) the weekly sermon is typically about sending all blacks back to Africa. Although, sometimes the priest explains how AIDs is God's way of punishing homos.
Well then, the Queen has spoken! What an arrogant bee-otch!
That woman defined ugly 40 years ago:
Since she mentioned only schools run by Catholics, Jews, Muslim extremists and white racists, I can only assume that Hilliary believes schools run other Christian organizations would be included in the latter category.
This from a woman who sent her child to private schools. Shoosh. Maybe she is uninformed, but one of the fastest growing segments of private schooling in America is Islamic schools. I am not aware of any white supremicist schools. I am aware that women and black only schools do exist and both receive public funds. I wonder how Mz Clinton feels about those inequities? Are there any all male schools still in existence?
Obviously Protestant.
its all about pandering to the teachers union.
In fairness to Hillary, there are very few private Protestant schools in NY (one exception that I can think of is "Friends Academy). Most of the private schools are Catholic, Jewish, Muslim or secular.
Even if your assumption was correct or even if Hillary admitted that.She would never get called on it.
Funny, I don't hear her gripping about US gov support of ACLU or local gov support of YWCA.
Vouchers for leftist schools have always existed under different banners.
No problem.
Liberals are accustomed to redefining words/expressions, i.e.: "Tolerance", "Gay", "Sex", "Nazi", "Free Speech", "Separation of Church and State", "Conservative", "Mainstream", "Fundamentalist Christian", "Choice", "Sexual Orientation/Preferences"...and the list goes on and on in the lexicon of the Brave New World.
You could offer a million dollars to anyone who could produce evidence that Hillary has ever admitted she was wrong about anything, and I believe your money would be safe.
Hillary! is a Progressive, and the Progressive view is that publik skools should stay the way they are.
Are the Friends white racists?
How about that parents have no choice but to send their kids to the failed school of liberalism gone wild?
Ol Hildabeast is ommitting why people want vouchers to begin win.
Maybe she is uninformed, but one of the fastest growing segments of private schooling in America is Islamic schools
That is right and they are some of the biggest supporters of you know what.
Actually, I believe the Quakers were the first abolitionist religious group in our nation's history. My point is that you should not take it personally if Hillary did not specifically mention Protestant religious schools in NY. Relatively speaking, there are none. I wouldn't mention them either.
Not good, but a handful of those would certainly be no worse than the thousands of publicly funded "Schools of Marxism" that the state currently operates. After, all, Marxism has already led to the violent deaths of more millions of people than I can count on my fingers and toes, and the systematic dumbing-down of the population which Marxist-oriented curricula achieve is making it harder and harder for the general American public to deal effectively with nutcases like jihadists and neo-nazis, and easier and easier for nutcase groups to recruit muddle-headed Americans.
In this case, democrats are keeping poor black folks, who overwhelmingly favor vouchers, from getting money to send their kids to better schools. democrats NEVER oppose more $$ for programs for black folks EXCEPT when it will cost them teacher union contributions. So tehy consign their constituents' kids to rot in hell. And again, I have never heard the GOP do a good job of calling the dems out.
Sorry, meant Clinton told them they had to vote against Bob Dole due to church bombings and lynchings (all done by democrats, of course).
She's never had a bad word to say about her all-female alma mater Wellesley (which is actually an excellent school, in spite of having graduated Hillary).
You're right. Dems usually do favor welfare programs, go figure.
with a headline like "Hillary Gets Ugly", I had to check to make sure I wasn't reading archived material from back around the day she was born.
You beat me to it.
Did you forget your sarcasm tag? I hope so.
The Dubai Port Deal?
spoof by Declan McCullagh
that and vouchers and of changing things to "fit" them
Liberals are all about choice except when it comes to things like choosing where to send your kids to school, choosing to own a gun, etc.
All of my friends who I grew up with in MA send their kids to private schools from 7th grade onward. They are paying double. I guess only the rich really have a choice on schools.... You poor/middle class people get whatever the govt. decides your kids need for an education... no choice...
I can only assume that "The smartest woman in the world" knows that there are Protestant (Christian) schools.
But, hey if she keeps her act in NY and doesn't come here and try to get my vote, I'll let her slide this time.
Actually, there are Protestant schools. I know of an Episcopalian and a Lutheran school.
Actually it annoys me when I see people photoshop her like that here. Photoshop is a favorite tactic of braindead liberals (to make Bush look like a monkey, etc). Hillary's ugliness needs no help.
She's related to Schmeegle.
You're still missing my point. There really are no Protestant schools in NY to speak of. Friends was the exception and from what I gather, they are not really a religious school anymore (but then again, how would you know if someone was practicing Quakerism in the first place, right?). There are plenty of Jewish and Islamic schools, and literally hundreds of Catholic schools. I don't know why there are so few protestant schools, but, again, I wouldn't read anything into Clinton not specifically mentioning them. If George Bush were here, there would be no point in his mentioning them either.
I can't believe nobody asked her how the "Church of the White Supremacist" became an accredited school!
I did not say there are none. Just that they are the exception.
Which reminds me: NY taxpayers are currently funding the gay Harvey Milk public school. I find this ironic in light of the Senator's comments about what we would and would not want to be paying for.
The Lutheran School is Our Savior, in the Bronx. Correct?
In her mind all Christian education. Throwing in "White Supremacist" was to make it "okay" to impune religious schools.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.