Fox News hypocrisy

Fox & Friends | 2/20/06

[sangrila]

"Huh, having a saudi prince own part of a major News network is not "national security" issue. Maybe you should look in the mirror at the hypocrisy of your statement."



For the fift time, he owns 5% of the shares of Newscorp. Do you understand that. He does not own FNC. And I'd rather have Al Qaea own 10 news networks, than to have Dubai running one American port unless you know of a way a nuclear weapon can be smuggled through television waves. Don't you have to go answer some questions from David Gregory now?

[pas]

Also I find it ironic that such people as Michelle Malkin and Frank Gaffney give legitmacy to the part saudi owned network, where 15 of the 9/11 hijackers came from.




So 15 hijackers came from Fox News? And I thought they where Saudis.

[Dane]

His mistake was giving this deal his blessing. You know he did that and that's exactly why you are supporting this

Actually a committe created by Congress did, but you already knew that, but still push the lies.

[sangrila]

"The American Public is outraged."




I live near one of these ports and can say that everyone is livid about this, including the most staunch republicans. I am led to believe the only people supporting this are making money off the deal.

[Cagey]

LOL!!! You are hysterical.

I remember you saying the President would never back off on the Miers nomination too.

Have a nice day. I've got to go push some lies.

[Dane]

For the fift time, he owns 5% of the shares of Newscorp. Do you understand that. He does not own FNC. And I'd rather have Al Qaea own 10 news networks, than to have Dubai running one American port unless you know of a way a nuclear weapon can be smuggled through television waves. Don't you have to go answer some questions from David Gregory now?

Huh, you are also pushing the lies. DPWorld is not going to run secuirty, DHS does. And BTW, where was your outrage when a foreign company P&O(a British firm home of shoe bomber richard reed and saddam buddy geroge galloway) was already running container operations.

It's amazing how you disregard facts, kinda of like david gregory.

[oh8eleven]

Fox News hypocrisy
Posted on 02/20/2006 6:32:53 AM EST by Dane
You let this bother you at 6:30 on a Monday morning? Either you're off your meds, or need to get some.

[ovrtaxt]

Dane, are you really THAT DENSE?!?!?!

Obviously the problem isn't with a foreign company. It's with an ISLAMIC company.

Here's some advice. Get a Koran and read it. Then tell me this port deal is okay.

[Dane]

I live near one of these ports and can say that everyone is livid about this, including the most staunch republicans. I am led to believe the only people supporting this are making money off the deal

Actually know, some people are fighting back against the hillary/schumer misinformation and being pushed by some at the part saudi owned Fox News Network.

BTW, when is Hannity going to acknowledge that part of his paycheck comes from a saudi prince.

[F16Fighter]

(yawn)

We heard all your blathering BS on the subject last night already:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1581900/posts

Don't you have better things to do...like rolling out the red carpet for another 1,000,000 illegal invaders at the Mexican Border?

[sangrila]

You just compared Britain to Dubai. That speaks volumes about your credibility. And DPWorld will be responsible for security in ports. DHS and the USCG are theoretically the primary security for ports. But port managers play a major role in the security of ports. You need to go buy some books on how ports work. If you ever looked at a flow chart from a port you would see that customs deals directly with port operators at the ports of departure and the ports of arrival. Customs deals primarily with port operators, in regards to monitoring shipping.

[dmw]

You aren't suggesting that Imus is a "grown-up" program are you?

[Dane]

Don't you have better things to do...like rolling out the red carpet for another 1,000,000 illegal invaders at the Mexican Border?

This is so funny, when facts are presented to you all, you all go on an ad hominem attack.

BTW, I'm all for the Kyl/Cornyn immigration bill, it's to bad your hero tom tancredo refuses to work with those good conservatives just to keep his and bay buchanan's PAC money flowing, akin to what jesse jackson does to keep his donations flowing.

[F16Fighter]

(yawn...ad infinitum)

[sangrila]

It beats reading this lunatics posts.

[Dane]

You just compared Britain to Dubai. That speaks volumes about your credibility. And DPWorld will be responsible for security in ports. DHS and the USCG are theoretically the primary security for ports. But port managers play a major role in the security of ports

Uh DPWorld has recruited the best western talent and are repsected in the shipping industry and also they are not in charge of security, DHS and local authorites are, but I guess you subscribe to the joesef goebbels saying of tell a lie long enough and people will believe it.

[dmw]

Got a point there! ;-)

[Dane]

It beats reading this lunatics posts

Huh you are still posting on this "lunatics" thread.

Well I guess you subscribe to when all else fails, use ad hominem attacks.

[arasina]

Also I find it ironic that such people as Michelle Malkin and Frank Gaffney give legitmacy to the part saudi owned network, where 15 of the 9/11 hijackers came from.

So 15 hijackers came from Fox News? And I thought they where Saudis.

LOL! (good catch of bad grammar)

[RangerM]

But not by much.

I used to listen to Imus, but he gets irritating after awhile. Given the choice between Imus and Howard Stern, I can understand why NY'ers are so crazy.

I listen to local radio before Boortz on the 'net at 8:30