Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China, Iran Near Huge Oil Deal
AP - Yahoo News ^ | 2/17/2006 | ELAINE KURTENBACH - AP

Posted on 02/17/2006 7:10:50 AM PST by Jeff Head

SHANGHAI, China - China and Iran are close to setting plans to develop Iran's Yadavaran oil field, according to published reports, in a multibillion-dollar deal that comes as Tehran faces the prospect of sanctions over its nuclear program.

The deal is thought potentially to be worth about $100 billion.

According to Caijing, a respected financial magazine, a Chinese government delegation is due to visit Iran as early as March to formally sign an agreement allowing China Petrochemical Corp., also known as Sinopec, to develop Yadavaran.

The Wall Street Journal also reported in Friday's editions that the two sides are trying to conclude the deal in coming weeks before potential sanctions are imposed on Iran for its nuclear ambitions. The report cited unnamed Iranian oil ministry officials familiar with the talks.

The deal would complete a memorandum of understanding signed in 2004.

In exchange for developing Yadavaran, one of Iran's largest onshore oil fields, China would agree to buy 10 million tons of liquefied natural gas a year for 25 years beginning in 2009, the Caijing report said, citing Sinopec board member Mou Shuling.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: ahmedinejad; chicoms; chinesebuildup; chinesecommunists; dragonsfuryseries; energy; freeperjeffhead; hujintao; irannukes; iranthreat; lng; naturalgas; oil; radicalislam; redchinathreat; worldwariii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last
This is exactly the type of thing we should all be very concerned about...Red China stepping into this and through their economic and military interests, blocking any effort to put a halt to Iran's nuclear efforts.

China is in the middile of this mix, and, IMHO, they certainley aren't on our side of the fence.

Terribly similar to the fictional Dragon's Fury Series scenario.

1 posted on 02/17/2006 7:10:53 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

FYI...not good.


2 posted on 02/17/2006 7:12:25 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Looking too similar, IMHO.


3 posted on 02/17/2006 7:14:39 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
China, Iran, Syria, N. Korea, Venezuela...all aligning. Russia playing both endss against the middle...but swinging more to that camp.

We need to stand firm and resolute...and we'd best have a lot of steel in our composition the way this is shaping up. I hope I am completely wrong.

4 posted on 02/17/2006 7:17:58 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

It will be tough to drill for oil when everything glows.


5 posted on 02/17/2006 7:18:09 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

But maybe there is an upside to this - along the lines of a typical "protection racket". China wouldn't want any "accidents" to happen that would disrupt deliveries of their petroleum products, would they? Remember (cough, cough) that little matter of the unfortunate Clinton-era bombing error that took out the Chinese embassy in Yugoslavia? Unless the Iranian regime suddenly becomes very, very cooperative on the nuclear front, some innocent bystanders could be hurt (cough, cough). But a little insurance could be had if China would twist a few mullahs' arms, which would guarantee that the gas deliveries continue uninterrupted (hint, hint)...


6 posted on 02/17/2006 7:18:41 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

So far, you are only wrong with the Indians---and that could be a big "except."


7 posted on 02/17/2006 7:19:00 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LS
Even India is keeping its options open...making deals and conducting exercises with both sides.

The new carrier they are refitting is Russian and will be filled with Russian aircraft and defense systems. They have conducted exercises with the Chinese military right along with the ones they conduct with us.

We need, IMHO, to be much more active in recruiting and brining them solidly into our camp. I hope and pray...and believe...we shall.

8 posted on 02/17/2006 7:23:20 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
FYI...not good.

I don't think so either, Jeff.  Thanks for the ping!

9 posted on 02/17/2006 7:24:26 AM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
I hope you are right and that we can have that type of influence...but I don't think we can count on it in the least.

The Chinese are aware of and applying this Sun Tsu saying..."All warfare is deception."

10 posted on 02/17/2006 7:24:56 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Just two bands of crazed thugs making a deal. Nothing to see here.


11 posted on 02/17/2006 7:26:09 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Yes, and they will use similar techniques against us (you wouldn't want to have any "accidents" with Los Angeles, would you?).


12 posted on 02/17/2006 7:26:49 AM PST by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

March 15, 2006 is just down the road, but I don't think the Chic*nts will make any moves until after the 2008 Olympics...until then, they want to look good, to the extent that any barbaric thugocracy can actually do so.


13 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:29 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
It definitely adds to the pot. and its not a good mix.

I was wondering if we send in ground troops what would be China's take on protecting her economic assets.

14 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:31 AM PST by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Is all of this gas and oil going to China via land routes?


15 posted on 02/17/2006 7:28:46 AM PST by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

And in the context could keep Pakistan in by acting as an "honest broker" between the two.


16 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:11 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Unless it is Oil for Nukes!Which I would not put past the friends of klinton.
17 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:22 AM PST by Steveone (Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Good political move by China...

The wreckless dolts with their heads in the sand running the American gub'mint had better realize we're further suseptible to economic blackmail if we continue to ignore our own oil resources and refineries, and developing alternative fuel sources besides oil. AND QUICK.

18 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:41 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Agreed. 2008 with the Olympics and an election here in the US is much more likely a time frame.


19 posted on 02/17/2006 7:29:49 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
As an aside this long war is going to have an effect on the shaping of the Military, would it still be able to fight a conventional war as well as a whole series of insurgencies and nation building operations around the globe.
20 posted on 02/17/2006 7:30:03 AM PST by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Would be very difficult. Have to believe it is primarily a sea route...unless the Russians and the Stans to the north get into the deal.


21 posted on 02/17/2006 7:31:05 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh

I am afraid we may be looking at the potential for a "conventional" war on the order of World War II in scope. I hope I am wrong.


22 posted on 02/17/2006 7:32:14 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Amen. We are standing into harms way and we'd best prepare for it in every way. Including military, economically, energy, manufacturing, agriculture, etc.


23 posted on 02/17/2006 7:34:12 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I imagine we'll be trading Taiwan for Iran in the near future.


24 posted on 02/17/2006 7:34:48 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tonycavanagh

They have already had military delegations visit Iran. We may well look at a scenario where China tells us to back down from any military option as regards Iran...in which case Iran will continue to thumb its nose at the free world. And in which case our mettle and will shall be severely tested.


25 posted on 02/17/2006 7:35:59 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

A terribly sobering thought. I pray not.


26 posted on 02/17/2006 7:36:40 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

March 15, 2009, maybe? You'd only be off by three years.


27 posted on 02/17/2006 7:36:57 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Now is the time for all good customes agents in Tiajunna to come to the aid of their stuned beebers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I have seriously considered a re-write...a new edition if you will...that pushes the time fram back to 2009 or 2010 and edits the entire series accordingly to allow for it.


28 posted on 02/17/2006 7:38:39 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

The Chinese are not stupid...if no, then they get Irans' oil...if yes, then we get Iran and they get Taiwan.


29 posted on 02/17/2006 7:42:11 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Battle lines being drawn for WW IV.


30 posted on 02/17/2006 7:42:29 AM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
They have already had military delegations visit Iran. We may well look at a scenario where China tells us to back down from any military option as regards Iran...in which case Iran will continue to thumb its nose at the free world. And in which case our mettle and will shall be severely tested.

Then it seems that Iran should be dealt with as soon as possible. Waiting would appear to make the scope of the war larger. The longer we wait, the worse it will be.

31 posted on 02/17/2006 7:42:43 AM PST by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Agreed.


32 posted on 02/17/2006 7:43:40 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Next we'll hear -

"China sees no need for further sanctions or military action" when Iran's nuclear ambitions go before the UNSC.


33 posted on 02/17/2006 7:44:06 AM PST by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Iran could get by with China as its sole oil customer at bargain rates, and drive oil prices elsewhere sky high.


34 posted on 02/17/2006 7:44:12 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Iran could get by with China as its sole oil customer at bargain rates, and drive oil prices elsewhere sky high.


35 posted on 02/17/2006 7:44:54 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Red China stepping into this and through their economic and military interests, blocking any effort to put a halt to Iran's nuclear efforts.

That is exactly what this is. China is buying an ally in the Middle East, hitting us right where we're most vulnerable, in the energy sector.

Weaning ourselves off overpriced Middle Eastern crude is not only an economic issue, it's becoming a matter of national security.

36 posted on 02/17/2006 7:45:22 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

What concerns me is that too many nations who we have some problems with may react if we hit Iran's nukes due to their oil needs getting disrupted. THis is why "hey, lets just take 'em out" is not as easy as it sounds...


37 posted on 02/17/2006 7:48:58 AM PST by repubzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LS; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Travis McGee; tonycavanagh; Momaw Nadon; yldstrk; B.O. Plenty
As an aside to our INdia discussion, check out this thread from last year.

India and China agree to Strategic Partnership

Particularly, as regards The Dragon's Fury Series, check out post number 90 on that thread.

Wierd.

38 posted on 02/17/2006 7:51:00 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: repubzilla
You are right. NOt easy at all. Never would have been easy...but it is getting tougher and tougher, and more and more fraught with global, dangerous, implications. AT the same time, we cannot allow Iran to develop that capability.
39 posted on 02/17/2006 7:52:19 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Iran figures it can thumb it's nose all it wants to, and an alliance with China will only make her the ultimate nose thumbing machine. Oh what to do? We accept Iran as the newest entrant to the nuclear powers, or we better be prepared to do something about it. Not many options as I see it, but then circumstances aren't in my control and time can change alot of things.


40 posted on 02/17/2006 7:52:33 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Spot on my friend...in the middle of the ring.


41 posted on 02/17/2006 7:52:53 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: repubzilla

I know, let's get a regime change going...oops, tried that.


42 posted on 02/17/2006 7:53:12 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
This is also going to give them the PERFECT pretext to militarily intervene in any conflict.

I wouldn't be suprised to see a joint China - Iran Naval Exercise right in the Persian Gulf.

43 posted on 02/17/2006 7:53:24 AM PST by Centurion2000 ("If you're going to shoot somebody, Shoot! Don't talk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
They (the Red Chinese) are aligning their strategic assets world-wide, from Iran, to the sub-continent, to the Pacific Rim, to South America, to Central America, to the Carribean, and to some extent, even right here in North America (IMHO) so as to be in a position to try and checkmate any action we attempt to take.

When you take it all together...it is a clear, planned, strategic alignment.

44 posted on 02/17/2006 8:02:53 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Gotta pick up your books, Jeff...


45 posted on 02/17/2006 8:04:42 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

You're trying to make our day again... ;o)


46 posted on 02/17/2006 8:13:14 AM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

Thanks. If you do, let me know what you think. You have fremail.


47 posted on 02/17/2006 8:13:21 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
[ This is exactly the type of thing we should all be very concerned about...Red China stepping into this and through their economic and military interests, blocking any effort to put a halt to Iran's nuclear efforts. ]

AND a good first srike target in case of Ugh!.. an asian problem.. Would hard for China and India to store much long term supplies.. of the stuff.. makes them vulnerable.. Armys don't move well on no fuel.. or economys either..

48 posted on 02/17/2006 8:15:47 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Sort of like the three gorges Dam. The Chinese call it the biggest dam in the world (and it is). The US Air Force calls it the biggest target.


49 posted on 02/17/2006 8:27:20 AM PST by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; joanie-f
FYI...not good.

Financed, no doubt, by the massive trade surplus China has at its disposal due to the offshoring of manufacturing and technical services the U.S. has provided to the Chicoms in recent years.

So now the Chinese now have the infrastructure to build a state-of-the-art military force, the technical expertise, and the fuel to make it go.

Wonderful.

50 posted on 02/17/2006 8:48:36 AM PST by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-132 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson