Posted on 02/14/2006 10:11:24 AM PST by Chi-townChief
ROFLMAO! Libertarians lack imagination--this from a Freeper whose posts are so predictable we can play a$$hole bingo with them, whose idea of a creative solution for the drug problem is to keep trying what's failed. What, do you have some checklist of inanities for each WoSD thread? You can cross off "pot is a gateway drug," "people who advocate legalization are druggies" and "people who advocate legalization are brain damaged" now. Three or four more and you probably get a check from your buddies at the drug companies and the AMA.
Um, I haven't made any suggestions, and this is not a "WOD thread" Pee-Wee.
Who's Richard Roepper?
And yet, you were the first poster to mention drugs.
Maybe you need a drink.
In referrence to Ozzy Osborn. Do you want to talk about him?
You haven't made ANY suggestions? Maybe you DO have a great imagination! And if it isn't a WoSD thread, then why did you make it one, cocktail weenie? You brought up the 'gateway drug' stuff in the first place.
Man this is like talking to a child. Care to point out a few of these supposed WOD suggestions that I have made? If you are so obsessed with one issue that you can't take an offhand comment for what it is, you really might want to re-evaluate your priorities. You are projecting events onto this thread that never happened.
Ah, here we have that pot-kettle situation again. You're the one that dragged the WoSD into this thread. And again, you embarrass yourself, admitting that your imagination extends to jack and $#!#--you have made no suggestions re: the WoSD, since the total of your imagination is invested in lobbing ad hominems against those who don't worship the WoSD like you do.
The word is "delusional."
Look it up.
No, I can't find any suggestions you supposedly made. That was MY point. See, there's this thing called sarcasm, and it explains why I made this post, where I said "Maybe you DO have a great imagination!" right after this post where I laughed at you for claiming Libertarians don't have any imagination when your idea of creativity is posting the same thing on a different thread. The word is...ah, hell, you wouldn't be able to look it up with your head up your a$$ anyway.
Ooh, am I angry and divisive too? Maybe I can't find WMD's? Geez, you are pathetically like a Rats in your ability to lie through your teeth to distract from the truth. YOU brought up the issue of the WoSD. YOU are the one who drags it, and your pathological hatred of anyone or anything remotely libertarian, from thread to thread. YOU made the lame-ass claim that Libertarians weren't imaginative, and I pointed out that was the pot calling the kettle black, as your imagination is well-suited for the role you choose to play in the WoSD threads (i.e., the Mackeyesque DARE types). Then YOU went on to prove it, claiming you'd made no suggestions as to how to stop the drug 'problem,' and I sarcastically responded that this demonstrated that imagination you're so proud of. You have missed that again, even though I tried smaller words to explain it to you. And you don't seem to want to go away, even though you've been whooped like a red-headed stepchild on more occasions than a Rainman can count.
What's funniest of all is that I'm not the one emotionally charged about the issue--it's just that you entertain me. It's like watching the famous "Bambi Meets Godzilla" short any time you post--and to make it obvious for you, you would be BAMBI, to nearly anyone parrying to your feeble attempts at playing the bomb-tosser. I just happen to like breathing fire and stomping on small forest creatures and Tokyo occasionally. Everyone needs a hobby.
No nerve touched here, other than the funny bone. Yer killing me with these 'psych eval' posts. I remember a senior friend in college talking about those who love pysch, saying that anyone who wants a career thinking about people who are f'ed in the head is probably a narcissist. How right he was.
But you can call me unoriginal (trying to dig yourself out of the checklist hole) and claim I'm obsessed with the WoSD (trying to avoid the fact that YOU posted on the issue first) or whatever insults you want to spew (par for the course when it comes to your 'logic-laden,' 'persuasive' posts). Everyone else can read the thread. It's not false bravado when the facts are on my side. It's REAL bravado. LOL.
Not really.
I am now remebering who you are, and it's starting to make sense. You are the libertarian who comes on threads with no point to make whatsoever. Which explains why you labled this a drug thread even though no issues have been discussed. I also remember that in the past I have conceeded that there are other libertarians who are worthy of debate, but that you personally are too dumb to bother with. I have conversed with many libertarians here on FR, but you are the only one who has elicited that observation. And it has been made repeatedly.
Sorry, man. I have no checklist. I made an offhand comment to someone else, and you decided that this was a drug thread. Then you didn't make a point. There is a pattern here. You are obviously lonely, desperate for ANY interaction with another human being. But, again, I can't help you there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.