Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bottled water, a natural resource taxing the world's ecosystem (BARF ALERT)
Yahoo News ^ | 2/10/2006 | AFP

Posted on 02/10/2006 9:16:02 AM PST by ConservativeBamaFan

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Bottled water consumption, which has more than doubled globally in the last six years, is a natural resource that is heavily taxing the world's ecosystem, according to a new US study.

"Even in areas where tap water is safe to drink, demand for bottled water is increasing, producing unecessary garbage and consuming vast quantities of energy," according to Emily Arnold, author of the study published by the Earth Policy Institute, a Washington-based environmental group.

Arnold said although in the industrial world bottled water is often no healthier than tap water, it can end up costing 10,000 times more.

"At as much as 2.50 dollars per liter (10 dollars per gallon), bottled water costs more than gasoline," the study says.

It added that the United States was the largest consumer of bottled water, with Americans drinking 26 billion liters in 2004, or about one eight-ounce (25 cl) glass per person every day.

Mexico was the second largest consumer at 18 billion liters followed by China and Brazil at 12 billion liters each.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barf; barfalert; bottledwater; ecosystem; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Personally, I don't think I'd drink anything in Mexico UNLESS it was bottled.
1 posted on 02/10/2006 9:16:04 AM PST by ConservativeBamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
bottled water costs more than gasoline," the study says.

I'm partial to drinking gasoline, myself.

2 posted on 02/10/2006 9:18:00 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

The whole bottled water craze is pretty ridiculous. Tap water is just fine for me.


3 posted on 02/10/2006 9:20:25 AM PST by GreenFreeper (Not blind opposition to progress, but opposition to blind progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan

I'd like to see a pile of all the used bottled-water bottles, right next to a pile of all the discarded MSM newspapers. Don't forget to throw in the newsprint pile a container for all the water used in paper manufacture, as well as for the chlorine and other chemicals used for bleaching, printing, etc.


4 posted on 02/10/2006 9:20:50 AM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
At as much as 2.50 dollars per liter (10 dollars per gallon), bottled water costs more than gasoline

Are they suggesting we drink gasoline??
5 posted on 02/10/2006 9:23:42 AM PST by HEY4QDEMS (Learn from the past, don't live in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Its nice to know...after global warming, global cooling, the destruction of the African Red Beetle, the deforestation of the northwest Pacific, the demise of the Amazonian rainforrest...now we must worry about a lack of bottled water and this will eventually destroy our ecosystem.

Between the lines...you can easily grasp that Emily Arnold...the author...doesn't have much to do. She earned a degree somewhere...and really can't put it to much good. So she had to creat a new disaster...hoping that some think-tank...will take her in, pay her $80k per year...to bleed and weep to National Public Radio...about our serious bottled water situation.

Emily needs a job at Wal-mart...stocking the bottle water and cola beverages...and a happy husband named Walter who cooks blueberry waffles for breakfast.


6 posted on 02/10/2006 9:24:00 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
"...Earth Policy Institute, a Washington-based environmental group..."

It must be an objective study with an equally objective conclusion. Tight?

7 posted on 02/10/2006 9:26:07 AM PST by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
Personally, I don't think I'd drink anything in Mexico UNLESS it was bottled.

... and labeled "Tequila".

For years we've been hearing these eco-domsayers scraming about the water you drink being polluted and damaging, and you should only drink bottled water. Now that people are drinkig bottled water, they're in a frenzy anyhow.

8 posted on 02/10/2006 9:26:23 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan

I'm thinking that it's not THE WATER that's the issue here as to "taxing" natural resources.

IT'S THE PACKAGING, particularly the PLASTIC BOTTLES. They aren't often recycled and the manufacture of them is almost certainly posing the problems.

Particularly in countries mentioned...Mexico, China, Brazil...not known for recycling and known, instead, for mountains of trash and garbage nearly everywhere.


9 posted on 02/10/2006 9:26:56 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan

The tap water is good in my area, but it doesn't come in the cool bottles I can take to the gym.

But its not great like the well water from my parents house over in Wanker county, with no flourine and all.

Take out the flourine and I would be totally happy. My kids brush their teeth anyway.


10 posted on 02/10/2006 9:27:13 AM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenFreeper
The whole bottled water craze is pretty ridiculous. Tap water is just fine for me.

Tap water (aka Government water) is different form place to place. When it tastes like garbage, one has to buy private sector water.

11 posted on 02/10/2006 9:29:02 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I's not the water, it's the packaging. Mexico, especially, has a huge trash problem (d'oh), noticable to anyone who visits anywhere outside the grounds of a "nice" hotel.

Mexico, China, etc., evne the U.S. could create greater incentives to recycle the water packaging after use...like, maybe, require one empty be returned (or maybe two) for every new one purchased.

I know that in CA, there are several aging Asians making what appears to be a daily living by retrieving the recyclable water bottles out of the garbage throughout neighborhoods. Maybe people in Mexico and Brazil, especially, should get with the notion that all the garbage all over then countries is because they are leaving it there.

More recycling is the answer, combined with a fluoridated water supply in Mexico, especially. One tiny bite of one tiny morsel washed in Mexico's public water supply is enough to keep the average visitor in the infirmary for a week with intravaneous fluids. I know of what I speak.


12 posted on 02/10/2006 9:31:36 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
according to Emily Arnold, author of the study published by the Earth Policy Institute, a Washington-based environmental group.

Enviro-freaks will bitch about anything.

13 posted on 02/10/2006 9:32:57 AM PST by SIDENET ("IT'S A COOKBOOK!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

But, the fluorine helps to eliminate other things other than tooth decay. There are many very aggressive problems that affect humans that are water borne.


14 posted on 02/10/2006 9:33:26 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

I wouldn't recommend drinking flourine under any circumstances.


15 posted on 02/10/2006 9:33:26 AM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

Yup, all that crap they put in tap water in the city is nasty. I have well water at home, which is great, and take a bottle of my well water to work so I don't have to drink the tap water.


16 posted on 02/10/2006 9:33:58 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sybeck1

I agree, though, as to fresh well water that isn't flouridated. It's superb. Problem is, most Americans nowadays no longer have access to an independent (and clean, unaffected) water source, even if they CAN dig their own wells.

I do relish the fresh water, however, that's available on a brother's farm and also in a favored remote area of the Rocky Mountains. Sad that we even need a public water supply but that's the way it is today with our ever expanding human population.

Water is only as pure as it is not affected by other runoff.


17 posted on 02/10/2006 9:36:01 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan
Single serving plastic containers are a litter and resources problem. I'm conservative, so...I conserve.
18 posted on 02/10/2006 9:36:05 AM PST by aligncare (No one says, "I liked the movie but, there just wasn't enough cursing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

We have Baltimore City water - best in the world!

What gets me is this - at a local college, they eliminated drinking fountains (probably terrified of "lead" lawsuits) and but up signs - "Bottled drinking water is available in vending machines" - @ 1.25 a pop. In desperation once, I purchased one and read the content - "City of Dallas municipal water supply" -so I paid 1.25 for Texas water. Cool?

Also, all these people running around with bottles of room temperature water remind me of babies clasping their "botties".


19 posted on 02/10/2006 9:36:15 AM PST by Seajay (Ordem e Progresso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeBamaFan

In the U.S., just get a PUR water filter on the tap and use the PUR pitchers otherwise. PUR filers out most if not all fluorine and heavy metals, along with microbials and other nasties.


20 posted on 02/10/2006 9:37:24 AM PST by MillerCreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson