Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Touts Russia's Missile Capabilities [Missiles Can Penetrate Any Missile Defense System]
ABC News ^ | Jan. 31, 2006 | VLADIMIR ISACHENKOV [AP]

Posted on 01/31/2006 8:50:51 AM PST by conservativecorner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: LIConFem

Commies are commies for life.


21 posted on 01/31/2006 9:24:20 AM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp
until the technology is available to implement what Reagan envisioned (lasers) any missle based missle defense is weak/worthless.

It's not far away at all now.

22 posted on 01/31/2006 9:26:33 AM PST by Centurion2000 (SUPPORT THE DANES! BURN A KORAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
This coming from a old KGB guy I would cast a very skeptical eye to its validity
23 posted on 01/31/2006 9:29:04 AM PST by Steveone (Liberalism is a brain tumor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Actually it is already here and is being tested.

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/abl/index.html


24 posted on 01/31/2006 10:20:01 AM PST by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

It is designed as a theatre defence system I don't know what effect it will have on strategic nuclear weapons.


25 posted on 01/31/2006 2:37:00 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

Interesting how russia is ALWAYS too broke to finance the decommissioning of its nuke warheads under the SALT agreements and has to "pan handle" $$'s from the US to pay for it...BUT can find the money to develop new missile technology. Also likely that the new missile development was paid for with $$'s earmarked for nuke decommissioning.


26 posted on 01/31/2006 2:59:12 PM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kimosabe31


Or Oil $$. Remember Putin did a defacto nationalization of several O&G companies over the last couple of years.


27 posted on 01/31/2006 3:05:28 PM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: in hoc signo vinces

Putin equals hammer and Sickle!


28 posted on 02/01/2006 5:30:12 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

You are right and that it is advertised as a tactical system only but - It is designed to burn a hole into the side of any missile, strategic missiles are just as vulnerable as tactical in fact they are just bigger targets. The only limitation is distance to the target vs. the amount of air turbulence in between.

Also, this aircraft can be deployed at a forward base (Japan) and burn missiles as they launch (from China) and still in their boost phase.

I promise, the Pentagon never allows full disclosure of an advance system's capabilities.


29 posted on 02/02/2006 6:30:26 PM PST by LM_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: LM_Guy

Why not use satellites like the original Star Wars program called for?


30 posted on 02/02/2006 7:10:12 PM PST by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson