Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

February 18, 2006 - CD of Saddam Hussein's WMD admission. "BIGGEST STORY OF THE YEAR"
Jonathon Batchelor Show - ABC Radio | 1-25-06 | Me

Posted on 01/25/2006 9:45:40 PM PST by SideoutFred

Tonight on the Jonathon Batchelor Show on ABC the guest was John Loftis. He claims to have a CD of over 12 hours of tape recorded conversations from 1988 to 2002 of Saddam Hussein, Tariz Aziz and 30 to 40 other Iraqi leaders talking about WMDs, how they hid them from the UN and a whole host of other tidbits.

Loftis said the CD has been validated by the NSA as genuine. He would not go into specifics, only that he called it the BIGGEST STORY OF THE YEAR and will release it on February 18th at the Intelligence Forum in Washington, D.C.

He said he was very skeptical at first believing the informatino is just "too good to be true" and would totally exonerate the Bush Administration. He obtained the disc from a source in the intelligence community. He had it verified by the NSA and they confirmed it is Azia and Hussein's voices. The theory is that Hussein wire tapped his own conversations much like Nixon and Johnson did and was going to either put this in a book or use it to thumb his nose at the world by showing them how easy it was too hood-wink the West over WMD.

Apparently there are more tapes / CDs available as this particular one has 12 hours of random conversations, some more than an hour long and some only 10 or 15 minutes long over a 14 year period.

Anyone else hear this tonight? I look forward to the 18th of February.


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: batchelor; d; hussein; iraq; johnloftus; loftis; loftus; saddam; saddamtapes; talkradio; tariqaziz; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last

1 posted on 01/25/2006 9:45:43 PM PST by SideoutFred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

This right after that Iraqi general says WMD sent to Syria?

Hmmmm, is this another area Bush is finally hitting back on?


2 posted on 01/25/2006 9:47:52 PM PST by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Missed Batchelor tonight. Probably true. Loftis has issues though. He's like Debka. When he's right, he's right. When he's wrong, he's on Pluto howlin' at the moon.


3 posted on 01/25/2006 9:50:30 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

You always should remember that if it helps the Bush admin. it gets put on the last page of a newspaper, and if your lucky, maybe get a 15 second mention of it on CNN. Once!


4 posted on 01/25/2006 9:50:42 PM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred; icwhatudo

tick, tick, tick.... I can hardly wait until February 18th. Nothing like b*tch slapping the dems again with the truth.

It does look like Bush & Company are enjoying playing some offense for a change. Thank God they found a playbook!


5 posted on 01/25/2006 9:52:41 PM PST by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

There was a former Iraqi general on Hannity & Colmes tonight saying they hid the WMD in Syria and Jordan. RAT thug bob beckel was subbing for colmes, and had nothing to say.


6 posted on 01/25/2006 9:52:58 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tony Snow

Oh what the hey, is there anything at all to this story?


7 posted on 01/25/2006 9:55:02 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
>>>Hmmmm, is this another area Bush is finally hitting back on?<<<

Bush, the poker player is giving watchers a peek at one, and only one, of his cards.

Democrats....wise not to raise!

8 posted on 01/25/2006 9:55:37 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
Having such evidence, it would be pure genius to retain it as long as possible.

One could rest easy at night while your critics made complete fools of themselves...

9 posted on 01/25/2006 9:55:39 PM PST by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Batchelor asked Loftis if there is anything on the CD / Tapes about other countries. Loftis said "YES" and they name which nation states the WMD were hidden in, but he would not reveal the names.

Sorry for the spelling typos in the original. It should have said Tariq Aziz.

This is going to be interesting.


10 posted on 01/25/2006 9:56:00 PM PST by SideoutFred (Save us from the Looney Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
This right after that Iraqi general says WMD sent to Syria?

The one on Hannity & Colmes tonight?

11 posted on 01/25/2006 9:56:14 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
RAT thug bob beckel was subbing for colmes, and had nothing to say.

A twofer and I missed it!

I am glad the WMD thing is finally being reported. I'm sick of hearing that argument!

12 posted on 01/25/2006 9:56:28 PM PST by Just A Nobody ("Iraq joins coalition to fight terrorism!" I - LOVE - my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
He obtained the disc from a source in the intelligence community.

I would say this "source" is in a heap of trouble.

If the NSA "evaluated the audio" and found it to be authentic, then that means the NSA did not know about it. If the NSA is not the source, then who/what department is? I just don't see some CIA (or other) "source" just giving this type of data to a talk show host. Something does not seem right here.

I don't see how this could be the "biggest story" claim since any fair-minded person knows Iraq had WMDs since they used chemical weapons. We gave them one year advance notice that we are coming so they had one year to move the stuff to Syria or other.

Only the RATs refuse to acknowledge the obvious.

13 posted on 01/25/2006 9:57:33 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
It means nothing if the media does not report it--the masses of asses will continue to be hooked up to the government/media matrix.

February 18th be damned!!! Bush needs to play this in his State of the Union Speech if he wants to get the information out there. Then Scott McClellan needs to make this the focus of his next 64 daily press conferences.

14 posted on 01/25/2006 9:57:59 PM PST by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker
>>>Thank God they found a playbook!<<<

He's had the playbook all along. Bush is just playing poker. You will never see his all cards until he folds his hand on Jan. 20th, 2009.

15 posted on 01/25/2006 9:58:47 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
"He said he was very skeptical at first believing the informatino is just "too good to be true" and would totally exonerate the Bush Administration."

The Bush Administration needs no "exoneration."

Saddam hussein shot at U.S. war planes enforcing the UN no-fly zones over Iraq. That's an act of war.

Hussein paid rewards to the families of suicide bombers in Israel, our ally.

Hussein violated the terms of his 1991 Gulf War Surrender Agreement. Again, an act of war.

Hussein housed and fed noted terrorists in Iraq for years prior to 2003 (e.g. Abu Abbas and Abu Nidal...both of whom died in Iraq).

And the U.S. Congress said that we could use force to rectify all of the above.

We don't need some tape recording to tell us that we were right. We already know it.

16 posted on 01/25/2006 9:59:59 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

I have heard similar stories like this before, and as always I will believe it when I see it.


17 posted on 01/25/2006 10:00:13 PM PST by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik; devolve; PhilDragoo; Smartass; bitt; Boazo; Zacs Mom; Lady Jag; dixiechick2000

PING!!


18 posted on 01/25/2006 10:01:53 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

And with the help of a few "friends" Saddam got all the money he needed...


Appointee linked to Iraq kickbacks


By Marian Wilkinson National Security Editor
January 26, 2006


A BUSINESSMAN appointed by the Howard Government to the US-led occupation government in Iraq personally sanctioned kickbacks to Saddam Hussein's regime, according to evidence uncovered by the inquiry into the oil-for-food scandal.

Trevor Flugge, the former chairman of the wheat exporter, AWB, was named in an internal AWB email dated September 2002 which describes a scheme to evade UN sanctions on Iraq by funnelling money to Saddam's regime through a London company called Ronly Holdings.

The email, written by AWB's head of international sales and marketing, Michael Long, said that Mr Flugge and another AWB executive "were aware of the deal and sanctioned it".


http://tinyurl.com/8nvfe


19 posted on 01/25/2006 10:02:27 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Yes, I heard it!!!! Wow - hope this pans out. It sounds like the real thing, I certainly hope so. I never miss John Batchelor.


20 posted on 01/25/2006 10:02:35 PM PST by nuclady (( Nagin, Blanco and Landrieu: Wynkin', Blynkin', and Nod ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha; flashbunny

ping


21 posted on 01/25/2006 10:03:38 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (There's nothing "Mainstream" about the Orwellian Media!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

O you bet! If this is true, they basically let the Democrats destroy themselves for next 30 years.


22 posted on 01/25/2006 10:03:50 PM PST by farlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Tariz Aziz

23 posted on 01/25/2006 10:03:57 PM PST by Doogle (USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
>>>The one on Hannity & Colmes tonight? <<<

That former Iraqi General(?) official(?) on Hannity seemed very very creditable - in command of his facts and unhesitant to tell what he knows.

Beckel didn't have anything to offer because he was stunned - he saw the basis for the primary Democrat charge against Bush dissolving before his eyes. Sweet sight.

24 posted on 01/25/2006 10:03:58 PM PST by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

DUmmie suicides predicted if true


25 posted on 01/25/2006 10:04:10 PM PST by varyouga (I no longer fear death. I only fear the day when the DUmmies take over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
"...and would totally exonerate the Bush Administration."

This if true, well and good, it would be great to stick up the nose of the rats and the phony media, though I believe nothing will stop their Bush bashing, and IMO President Bush needs no exoneration.
26 posted on 01/25/2006 10:04:36 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

27 posted on 01/25/2006 10:05:42 PM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse; doug from upland; Mia T; ALOHA RONNIE; jwalsh07; Born Conservative; mhking; ...

ping!


28 posted on 01/25/2006 10:06:08 PM PST by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing
One could rest easy at night while your critics made complete fools of themselves...

Entirely feasible to do, when your critics are complete fools.

29 posted on 01/25/2006 10:06:15 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

I smell a Rovian operation. LoL!


30 posted on 01/25/2006 10:07:06 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farlander

I would LOVE to see these fools and @'oles destroy themselves for the next 30 years.

Far, FAR better seeing them destroy themselves for the next 30 years, than watching them destroy the country for the next 30.


31 posted on 01/25/2006 10:07:43 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

I didn't hear about this, but did anyone see H&C tonite? A former general says that yes, stuff was moved to Syria, just as suspected. Why now, though? Why didn't we hear from this guy earlier? I know there are many things we don't hear about. I'm just wondering.


32 posted on 01/25/2006 10:08:16 PM PST by Just Lori (Oh my soul, be prepared to meet Him who knows how to ask questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

There are several threads on FR about this ...It is to be released at a conference in Febuary


33 posted on 01/25/2006 10:10:20 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
We don't need some tape recording to tell us that we were right. We already know it.

Correct. I never had a doubt that Saddam hid his WMD program and WMD assets from the world up to this day.

34 posted on 01/25/2006 10:10:43 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Oh what the hey, is there anything at all to this story?

Oh, let's hope so!

If it sounds too good to be true...

35 posted on 01/25/2006 10:10:55 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

Note to self: read replies to post first. =)


36 posted on 01/25/2006 10:11:58 PM PST by Just Lori (Oh my soul, be prepared to meet Him who knows how to ask questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
Heck could have been compiled from foreign news interviews, public statements, etc. The CD was complied and passed to Loftis to disseminate it.
37 posted on 01/25/2006 10:12:24 PM PST by endthematrix (None dare call it ISLAMOFACISM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo
This right after that Iraqi general says WMD sent to Syria?

I doubt they're there any more.

38 posted on 01/25/2006 10:13:38 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

Maybe something to shut the democrats up about for the next week leading up to the SOTU and Confirmation of Alito. I guess that would be true if the mdia would actually be interested in this story. Wonder how much coverage this will get? It is always great to see the democrats making total complete fools of themselves.


39 posted on 01/25/2006 10:14:43 PM PST by laxin4him (They will know by our love not our picket lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

http://www.johnbatchelorshow.com/article.cfm?id=2669


40 posted on 01/25/2006 10:15:34 PM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nuclady
We'll see if it's true. If it is, it would be a major blow to the Dems. Here's my soap box....

We don't need any more proof. Anyone who can't see that Saddam didn't have enough time to take his stuff somewhere is blind as a mole. He used the stuff for pete's sake. How could he use stuff he didn't have?

I mean this whole thing is a joke. A canard set up by the MSM and repeated enough to create lollipop land.

41 posted on 01/25/2006 10:15:37 PM PST by ALWAYSWELDING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Info will be released at a non poltical forum...


Rope a Dope been a comin?


42 posted on 01/25/2006 10:16:48 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The Bush Administration needs no "exoneration." Saddam hussein shot at U.S. war planes enforcing the UN no-fly zones over Iraq. That's an act of war. Hussein paid rewards to the families of suicide bombers in Israel, our ally. Hussein violated the terms of his 1991 Gulf War Surrender Agreement. Again, an act of war. Hussein housed and fed noted terrorists in Iraq for years prior to 2003 (e.g. Abu Abbas and Abu Nidal...both of whom died in Iraq). And the U.S. Congress said that we could use force to rectify all of the above. We don't need some tape recording to tell us that we were right. We already know it.

Exactly right - Those who keep thinking that we "need" the WMD proof to "prove" something are completely falling for a false premise to begin with -

We removed Saddam and his regime because they were a threat. Period.

al Qeade did not have WMDs....but would anyone seriously try and deny that they weren't a threat? Of course not.

Our actions to remove Saddam and begin the phase of bringing the values of freedom and self-worth to the heart of the ME were exactly right and the World is safer because of it.

The idea that this guy has "CD/Tapes" with "all" the proof begs one to "wait and see". My experience tells me he seems to be more concerned with "hyping" something then worried about finding out the actual truth.

Additionally if these discussions on these tapes (1988-2002) are talks regarding Saddam's (already known) earlier WMDs program (late 80's, early 90's)...then there is no new information here.

But again, Southack has it exactly right (above).

43 posted on 01/25/2006 10:17:32 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

"The Israeli officer, Lieutenant General Moshe Yaalon, asserted that Saddam spirited his chemical weapons out of the country on the eve of the war. "He transferred the chemical agents from Iraq to Syria," General Yaalon told The New York Sun over dinner in New York on Tuesday night. "No one went to Syria to find it."

'snip'

"An article in the Fall 2005 Middle East Quarterly reports that in an appearance on Israel's Channel 2 on December 23, 2002, Israel's prime minister, Ariel Sharon stated, "Chemical and biological weapons which Saddam is endeavoring to conceal have been moved from Iraq to Syria." The allegation was denied by the Syrian government at the time as "completely untrue," and it attracted scant American press attention, coming as it did on the eve of the Christmas holiday."

http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=24480


44 posted on 01/25/2006 10:24:40 PM PST by dervish (when did Osama start writing the lefts talking points?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Additionally if these discussions on these tapes (1988-2002) are talks regarding Saddam's (already known) earlier WMDs program (late 80's, early 90's)...then there is no new information here. But again, Southack has it exactly right (above).

I would agree to all of that, and add that we certainly had all the justification needed to invade Iraq. We need no further justification, but it sure would be nice to locate any stockpiles, and also the missing Russian explosive materials that I believe Moscow retrieved just prior to the first bomb dropping. There was a lot of stuff missing that was tagged during the inspections. It has never turned up, from what I can understand.

There was likely some chemical/bio munitions with that stuff as well, which would explain the chem/bio suits and atropine pens.

45 posted on 01/25/2006 10:27:20 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
Those who think there were no WMDs precluding the Iraq invasion because they despise Bush will never, ever believe otherwise. The irrational haters on the left are nothing but 500 BC pagans looking into pig entrails for their next sign that Bush is to blame for whatever ill winds blow or disaster happens.
46 posted on 01/25/2006 10:27:38 PM PST by Apercu ("Res ipsa loquitur")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Liberals are always moving the goalposts for the administration. If it's ever proven that Iraq had WMDs, they would fall back on saying that Iraq wasn't planning to attack the US with them. And if that were ever proven, I'm sure the lib talking points would just fall back onto the next excuse down the line.

Unfortunately their propaganda has worked enough that a good 35% of the country at least wouldn't support the president even if he cured cancer and found a way to transmute all metals into gold. They just hate his guts.


47 posted on 01/25/2006 10:28:52 PM PST by Phocion ("Protection" really means exploiting the consumer. - Milton Friedman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

later read


48 posted on 01/25/2006 10:32:51 PM PST by Mo1 (Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

The good thing about internet technology is that this stuff will be all over the web for everyone to hear.


49 posted on 01/25/2006 10:36:07 PM PST by doug from upland (NEW YORK TIMES -- traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

http://www.intelligencesummit.org/news/JohnLoftus/JL010606.php


50 posted on 01/25/2006 10:40:28 PM PST by ganeshpuri89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson