Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Cooperative Security Act
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:s.00853 ^

Posted on 01/22/2006 12:16:42 PM PST by savedbygrace

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last
To: mthom
Which takes us back to the demographic/economic reality that is well stated in the article that I linked you to. Big and emerging markets versus mature and shrinking markets, and how that relates to immigration and trade policies.

As you are accurately concerned and worried about, and as the Roadmap to the 21st Century predicts, borders are going to bend and there will be threats to national sovereignty but borders and sovereignty will prevail. OTOH, the only other options, those that you advocate, leads to a withering of the economy which results in a loss of equity. A certain destruction of the nation.

You are correct about the unions and McK but you are ignoring the unions opposition to guest workers/the Bush Plan.

Your, and many other's, problem is that your knowledge and perception on this issue is short-lived. The long-running debate is the pubs wanting temporary visas and the dems wanting permenant visas. You can trace this back to the Braceros and LBJ killing that program to benefit the unions. This was followed by the creation of the union with no members(UFW) and how the dems were able to prevent the expansion and evolvement of the H2A and H2B.

Your also ignoring who holds the power in Congress. Twenty years ago it was the Senate republicans telling Reagan that this was the best deal that they could negotiate so just shut up and sign it.

Then the power began to shift in the 90s and although the pubs could not prevail, they were willing to walk away from the table on the correct assumption that their power would further expand in the near future and they would soon be able to dictate to the dems. In the meantime the illegals would take up the slack.

But what the pubs didn't percieve was the split. That hairline crack that occurred in 99 is now big enough to drive a truck thru. Consequently, the dems still hold the power. You can rant all you wantabout the Bush Plan but it is still DOA.

161 posted on 01/25/2006 6:36:48 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin; mthom
leads to a withering of the economy which results in a loss of equity

The nation is losing its equity due to "free trade", not the sound economic policies endorsed by our founding fathers. When American companies move almost all their functions offshore, the investment that happens with their profits happens OFFSHORE, not here. when American companies move almost all their functions offshore, the American people are still taxed to provide a military to protect those companies, even though we no longer receive the economic benefit from those companies.

Cisco systems, a fine example of an virtual American company that is now effectively a Chinese company. No matter what you claim about their stocks and profits, they are no longer investing the the American economy by constructing and running their facilities here, or hiring American workers. And yet the obligation the American people have to that corporation remains the same as if it were a domestic corporation.
162 posted on 01/25/2006 7:38:33 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Cisco has a worldwide presence. If their only market were the US, they'd bellyup.

Think of the equity loss to the company and the stockholders.

163 posted on 01/25/2006 12:57:32 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

"What we are announcing today is the first of many steps we will take in research and development" in China, Chambers said.

"We believe in giving something back and truly becoming a Chinese company," Cisco Systems Inc. Chief Executive John Chambers said.

***

Funny how Cisco wants to "give something back" to China, but snubs the American people. Without us Cisco's technical product development under secure property rights could not have been carried out to create the company.


164 posted on 01/25/2006 1:09:42 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
Think of the equity loss to the company and the stockholders.

Think of the equity loss to the American economy, without which Cisco could not have been created.
165 posted on 01/25/2006 1:10:42 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

How much cisco stuff can an chinese worker purchase who makes less than a dollar a day?


166 posted on 01/25/2006 1:17:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace; arnoldpalmerfan; mthom; DoughtyOne; monkeywrench; Modok; EternalVigilance; Gelato; ...
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America: Next Steps
167 posted on 04/23/2006 9:23:29 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Thanks!


168 posted on 04/23/2006 10:52:41 PM PDT by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! I *LOVE* my attitude problem. Beware the Enemedia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace; La Enchiladita; JustPiper; TigersEye; Smartass; potlatch; onyx; TheLion; ...

Pinging you just in case you haven't seen this one!


169 posted on 04/23/2006 10:58:00 PM PDT by antceecee (Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Thanks, CeeCee. I had a discussion with a CFR proponent on one of the other threads. I kicked his ass and he admitted it.


170 posted on 04/23/2006 11:01:10 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita

I see you are wearing your ass-kickin boots this evenin' Miss La Dita!


171 posted on 04/23/2006 11:01:55 PM PDT by antceecee (Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: antceecee
I try not to... Really! Hee Hee
172 posted on 04/23/2006 11:03:25 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Something like this??
173 posted on 04/23/2006 11:06:28 PM PDT by antceecee (Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I got sidelined for a sec. Those are ALL RIGHT!

I have one pair of Larry Mahan's that I LOVE...!

Red with black inlay... mmm,hmmm!


174 posted on 04/23/2006 11:14:10 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (God Bless Our Troops...including U.S. Border Patrol, America's First Line of Defense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Thank you! BTTT


175 posted on 04/23/2006 11:17:57 PM PDT by TigersEye (Sedition and treason are getting to be a Beltway fashion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Great. Then we don't need to bother with the Mexican border, right?


176 posted on 04/23/2006 11:24:50 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Must I use a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Very welcome!


177 posted on 04/23/2006 11:50:50 PM PDT by antceecee (Hey AG Gonzales! ENFORCE IMMIGRATION LAWS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Great. Then we don't need to bother with the Mexican border, right?

Where would you get that idea?

178 posted on 04/24/2006 2:56:12 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-178 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson