Skip to comments.
Kennedy Says Alito 'Itching to Overturn Roe v. Wade'
CNS News ^
| January 20, 2006
| Nathan Burchfiel
Posted on 01/20/2006 5:48:42 PM PST by Kaslin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: phoenix0468
Abortion is a moral issue...
Tell that to the dead kid. Oh, you can't cuz they are dead.
41
posted on
01/20/2006 6:20:59 PM PST
by
isthisnickcool
(Quoting Hillary Clinton: "You know, you know, you know, you know.....")
To: Kaslin
Hey teddy... that itching is your herpes flair-up!
LLS
42
posted on
01/20/2006 6:21:07 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: Kaslin
"itching to overturn Roe v. Wade."
At least he's not itching to overturn a Buick in the Chappaquiddick.
43
posted on
01/20/2006 6:21:37 PM PST
by
kublia khan
(Absolute war brings total victory)
To: Kaslin
Kennedy: The ITCHY white meat.
44
posted on
01/20/2006 6:21:59 PM PST
by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: phoenix0468
The federal government should stay out of it and leave it to the individual states to decide where it lies. Excuse me, but that is precisely what Roe forbids, and was intended to forbid.
The states have zero power to decide virtually anything re. abortions. - It's all in the hands of the Federal judiciary, not the Government at any level.
45
posted on
01/20/2006 6:22:03 PM PST
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: dbostan
In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned.
I'm going to invoke my right of remission for that statement. I believe the constitution expressly prohibits abortion with the right to life statement. I also believe that it should not be a federal question. It should be left up to each state whether to allow abortion, and in what circumstances. There are some things that, IMO, are better left to the states to decide. I believe that it would reduce the type of political animosities that rage within the beltway.
46
posted on
01/20/2006 6:23:25 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: RichInOC
Nothing a little "splash" of Chivas won't cure.
To: Blurblogger
Bogus NECK BRACES are itchy, Ted, not decent judges.
To: Kaslin
Sheesh! Is there no other topic for dems other than abortion rights and environmental preservation?
49
posted on
01/20/2006 6:25:06 PM PST
by
barj
To: Kaslin
Kennedy realizes that if it weren't for Roe v. Wade, he'd have a whole lot bigger family than he's got. So much so that it'd be embarrassing even to him.
To: phoenix0468
The federal government should stay out of it and leave it to the individual states to decide where it lies. In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned.
The Judicial branch of the Federal Government took the issue out of the hands of the States. The two sentences above are contradictory.
51
posted on
01/20/2006 6:28:46 PM PST
by
You Dirty Rats
(I Love Free Republic!)
To: Kaslin
What did Teddy's mother think of abortion? I bet she would be totally mortified at her son's lust for the blood of babies.
52
posted on
01/20/2006 6:30:55 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
To: isthisnickcool
Well, I am quite internally devided on the issue anyway. I agree with you that it is a crime against the life of the aborted child. I won't use those technical terms like fetus or embryo because we both know that it is and will become a child if given the chance. Would you agree with abortion in the case of saving a mothers life? Or, and I know this is even more vague, in the case of rape or incest? I would definitely agree with it in the first case. The later case would bring up far to many cases of false claims IMO.
53
posted on
01/20/2006 6:31:54 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: phoenix0468
In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned
It should be overturned simply because it is an abomination to the Constitution. It was spun out of whole cloth and there are scores of Liberal Law professors who will tell you so.
54
posted on
01/20/2006 6:33:09 PM PST
by
msnimje
(Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
To: Kaslin
If Kennedy was as good at rescue swimming as he is at reading minds, Mary Jo Kopeckne would be alive today.
To: Moonman62
56
posted on
01/20/2006 6:35:22 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: Reagan Man
see #46 and get back with me. My verdict is still out on this issue. This issue affects the fairer sex more than it does me personally, although I have had experience with it. I have had to help my significant other make the choice, and we chose correctly thank goodness.
57
posted on
01/20/2006 6:37:15 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: GSlob
If the Democrats were smart, they would want Alito to overturn Roe v Wade so that their voting numbers would swell in 18 or so years when there are thousands more Dems in their districts.
58
posted on
01/20/2006 6:39:22 PM PST
by
willyd
(No nation has ever taxed its citizens into prosperity)
To: You Dirty Rats
I apologize, see #46. I realized their contradiction about a second and half after posting and truly did not mean it in that way. In retrospect my feelings are that it should be a state and not a federal question, if that clears it up.
59
posted on
01/20/2006 6:40:12 PM PST
by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: phoenix0468
A few facts. There have been 45,000,000 abortions since Roe v Wade was made US law by the Supreme Court in 1973. Roughly 95% of those abortions have nothing to do with rape, incest or the life/health of the mother. 95% of those abortions took place as a form of birth control.
"Our nation-wide policy of abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy was neither voted for by our people, nor enacted by our legislators--not a single state had such unrestricted abortion before the Supreme Court decreed it to be national policy in 1973. [It was] an act of raw judicial power"...
"We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life--the unborn--without diminishing the value of all human life."
-President Ronald Reagan "Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation"
60
posted on
01/20/2006 6:40:39 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
(Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-171 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson