Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedy Says Alito 'Itching to Overturn Roe v. Wade'
CNS News ^ | January 20, 2006 | Nathan Burchfiel

Posted on 01/20/2006 5:48:42 PM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last
To: phoenix0468
Abortion is a moral issue...

Tell that to the dead kid. Oh, you can't cuz they are dead.

41 posted on 01/20/2006 6:20:59 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Quoting Hillary Clinton: "You know, you know, you know, you know.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hey teddy... that itching is your herpes flair-up!

LLS
42 posted on 01/20/2006 6:21:07 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"itching to overturn Roe v. Wade."

At least he's not itching to overturn a Buick in the Chappaquiddick.
43 posted on 01/20/2006 6:21:37 PM PST by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kennedy: The ITCHY white meat.


44 posted on 01/20/2006 6:21:59 PM PST by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
The federal government should stay out of it and leave it to the individual states to decide where it lies.

Excuse me, but that is precisely what Roe forbids, and was intended to forbid.

The states have zero power to decide virtually anything re. abortions. - It's all in the hands of the Federal judiciary, not the Government at any level.

45 posted on 01/20/2006 6:22:03 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dbostan
In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned.

I'm going to invoke my right of remission for that statement. I believe the constitution expressly prohibits abortion with the right to life statement. I also believe that it should not be a federal question. It should be left up to each state whether to allow abortion, and in what circumstances. There are some things that, IMO, are better left to the states to decide. I believe that it would reduce the type of political animosities that rage within the beltway.
46 posted on 01/20/2006 6:23:25 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Nothing a little "splash" of Chivas won't cure.


47 posted on 01/20/2006 6:24:16 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
Bogus NECK BRACES are itchy, Ted, not decent judges.


48 posted on 01/20/2006 6:24:29 PM PST by Angus MacGregor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sheesh! Is there no other topic for dems other than abortion rights and environmental preservation?


49 posted on 01/20/2006 6:25:06 PM PST by barj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kennedy realizes that if it weren't for Roe v. Wade, he'd have a whole lot bigger family than he's got. So much so that it'd be embarrassing even to him.


50 posted on 01/20/2006 6:28:10 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
The federal government should stay out of it and leave it to the individual states to decide where it lies.

In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned.

The Judicial branch of the Federal Government took the issue out of the hands of the States. The two sentences above are contradictory.

51 posted on 01/20/2006 6:28:46 PM PST by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

What did Teddy's mother think of abortion? I bet she would be totally mortified at her son's lust for the blood of babies.


52 posted on 01/20/2006 6:30:55 PM PST by msnimje (Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Well, I am quite internally devided on the issue anyway. I agree with you that it is a crime against the life of the aborted child. I won't use those technical terms like fetus or embryo because we both know that it is and will become a child if given the chance. Would you agree with abortion in the case of saving a mothers life? Or, and I know this is even more vague, in the case of rape or incest? I would definitely agree with it in the first case. The later case would bring up far to many cases of false claims IMO.


53 posted on 01/20/2006 6:31:54 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
In conclusion I would say that the right of choice that Roe v. Wade provides should not be overturned

It should be overturned simply because it is an abomination to the Constitution. It was spun out of whole cloth and there are scores of Liberal Law professors who will tell you so.
54 posted on 01/20/2006 6:33:09 PM PST by msnimje (Senate Democrats ----------- Sound and Furry Signifying INSIGNIFICANCE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Kennedy was as good at rescue swimming as he is at reading minds, Mary Jo Kopeckne would be alive today.


55 posted on 01/20/2006 6:34:16 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

The constitution.


56 posted on 01/20/2006 6:35:22 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

see #46 and get back with me. My verdict is still out on this issue. This issue affects the fairer sex more than it does me personally, although I have had experience with it. I have had to help my significant other make the choice, and we chose correctly thank goodness.


57 posted on 01/20/2006 6:37:15 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

If the Democrats were smart, they would want Alito to overturn Roe v Wade so that their voting numbers would swell in 18 or so years when there are thousands more Dems in their districts.


58 posted on 01/20/2006 6:39:22 PM PST by willyd (No nation has ever taxed its citizens into prosperity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

I apologize, see #46. I realized their contradiction about a second and half after posting and truly did not mean it in that way. In retrospect my feelings are that it should be a state and not a federal question, if that clears it up.


59 posted on 01/20/2006 6:40:12 PM PST by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: phoenix0468
A few facts. There have been 45,000,000 abortions since Roe v Wade was made US law by the Supreme Court in 1973. Roughly 95% of those abortions have nothing to do with rape, incest or the life/health of the mother. 95% of those abortions took place as a form of birth control.

"Our nation-wide policy of abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy was neither voted for by our people, nor enacted by our legislators--not a single state had such unrestricted abortion before the Supreme Court decreed it to be national policy in 1973. [It was] an act of raw judicial power"...

"We cannot diminish the value of one category of human life--the unborn--without diminishing the value of all human life."

-President Ronald Reagan "Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation"

60 posted on 01/20/2006 6:40:39 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson