Skip to comments.
Full Report on Clinton Years Is Sought by GOP Senators
The New York Sun ^
Posted on 01/20/2006 3:31:45 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Sub-Driver
This is too hot not to get out. It will. The question is will it hurt the beast and clinocchio?
21
posted on
01/20/2006 4:47:07 AM PST
by
jmaroneps37
(We will never murtha to the terrorists. Bring home the troops means bring home the war.)
To: saveliberty
To: saveliberty
I thought I read somewheres that ANY member of Congress could release it..is this wrong?
23
posted on
01/20/2006 4:53:47 AM PST
by
ken5050
(Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
To: LegendHasIt
24
posted on
01/20/2006 4:57:42 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: ken5050
I had thought the same thing - that they could read it into the record.
Maybe the issue is that other members can redact it so that the net effect is that it's still not public?
I am hoping that Senator Grassley can shed some light on it today when he will be on Tony's show.
25
posted on
01/20/2006 4:59:36 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: Just mythoughts
I'm going to go for Joe Liberman stepping up to the line.
26
posted on
01/20/2006 5:04:18 AM PST
by
not2worry
(What goes around comes around.)
To: yoe
BTW, this is a redacted version of an already watered down report. I think the 26th draft was finally approved by attorneys of Hillary's friend at the IRS.
27
posted on
01/20/2006 5:04:24 AM PST
by
gov_bean_ counter
(It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
To: Sub-Driver
Simple three-step procedure:
Step 1: Demand un-redacted report
Step 2: Receive un-redacted report
Step 3: Release un-redacted report
It ain't rocket science, guys!
28
posted on
01/20/2006 5:06:06 AM PST
by
gridlock
(It's not really a circus until Teddy Kennedy steps out of the clown car...)
To: saveliberty
Democrats have cast the $21 million investigation as a waste of time and fundsWhich, IMHO, can only mean there IS something there......
29
posted on
01/20/2006 5:06:33 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Hillary's got more wrinkles than an elephants scrotum.)
To: maggief
Mr. Grassley is now poised to make another attempt at inserting the request into another bill when the full Congress returns to session at the end of the month.Why do those wimps feel they have to hide this in some unrelated legislation? Introduce this as a separate bill, in the House and Senate, and put it up for a vote. Then, watch with amusement as the Democrats argue against it and, hopefully, start a filibuster.
30
posted on
01/20/2006 5:07:50 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: b4its2late
There probably is, but the fact that some R's continue to clamp down on it in the House makes me wonder who else is implicated.
31
posted on
01/20/2006 5:08:30 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: saveliberty
Let 'em all go down in flames. Time to clean house anyway.
32
posted on
01/20/2006 5:09:30 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Hillary's got more wrinkles than an elephants scrotum.)
To: saveliberty
Two things never change.
1- Clinton scandals still abound even until today.
2- The Clinton attack dogs try to kill the messenger and say there is no evidence of wrong doing. Of course they work very, very hard at making sure that the "no evidence" is not released!
The Nazi "Big Lie" was never more evident than in the efforts on the part of ex-Clinton administration sycophants to accuse the current administration of being a "culture of corruption". [I exclude Congress from my defense as both parties have less than a stellar ethical record.]
33
posted on
01/20/2006 5:09:31 AM PST
by
FOXFANVOX
(Tony Snow: Fighting for the Release of the ENTIRE Barrett Report!)
To: b4its2late
It is time to clean House. And Senate
34
posted on
01/20/2006 5:11:19 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: FOXFANVOX
Great points. I have heard/read a number of rants (LOL! by trolls of course) that allege that the Clinton administration was so moral and legal and it all falls apart when you start making the list.
I think that we can't even begin to know just how low they actually go....When you look at the list, it's just too awful to be credible. Which is what the Clintons trade on.
Our good fortune is that they are very sloppy, thin skinned, intolerant and humor impaired and these are more successful avenues to pursue to get them out of the political system.
35
posted on
01/20/2006 5:14:48 AM PST
by
saveliberty
(Proud to be Head Snowflake, Bushbot and a new member of Sam's Club)
To: Sub-Driver
Republican senators are puzzling over how to ensure full release of a long-awaited independent counsel's report that alleges obstruction at the highest levels of the Clinton administration but which omits by court order a large narrative chunk that some conservatives think could be damaging to the former first lady, Senator Clinton.By whose "court order"??
And let's re-open the Vince Foster File AND Waco Files while we're at it.
The GOP and Bush DoJ has the means and reason for exposing the "highest levels" of the Clinton Admistration for obstructing justice on a regular basis...
It would be like shooting goldfish in a bowl, but will they??
Let's put it THIS way: Do we all recall 'Operation Ambassador' starring GH Bush and Bill Clinton??
To: F16Fighter
It's high time.
The high-handed contemptous suppression of unbelievable misdeeds will not be forgotten.
Bill and his arrogant spouse are criminals with a current agenda that must be reveled and stopped cold.
Time is nigh.
37
posted on
01/20/2006 5:26:42 AM PST
by
CBart95
To: not2worry
I doubt we will know the who if and when it gets leaked. I expect it will show up kinda like Rockefeller's memo did to Hannity.
Hannity told us we would be shocked to know who leaked it to him and to my knowledge he has never outed his whistle-blower.
To: saveliberty
Yep. I figure whomever is involved in shady stuff should be held responsible for it.
39
posted on
01/20/2006 5:40:29 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Why do croutons come in airtight packages? Aren't they just stale bread to begin with?)
To: CBart95
"Bill and his arrogant spouse are criminals with a current agenda that must be reveled and stopped cold. Time is nigh."
Should have been done already, but there is this pesky feeling -- something about a "conspiracy" involving EVERYONE (use your imagination.)
If the Clintons haven't been exposed by now, it ain't happening.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson