BARRETT REPORT RELEASED

OIC David Barrett ^ | January 18, 2006 | David Barrett

[Txsleuth]

Good....if it is true that any member of Congress can release ALL parts of the report...without consequence..there has GOT to be one that will.

[mondonico]

This time with link to the Court's 12/13/05 order.

[Marxbites]

Coburn is the goods - too bad that his only ally in the fight is Pence, and damn few others.

[George Smiley]

Reading proposed federal legislation in .pdf.

[YOUGOTIT]

Who is the court protecting by not allowing several hundred pages to not be released?

[tman73]

Clinton pardoned ALL who were investigated/indicted by the OIC during his term... EVERYONE...
On his last day in office.
(...those that were still alive that is)

[Revolting cat!]

Will someone leak?

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

It would just make Voinovich cry again!

[R. Scott]

I wish it didn’t have all of this stuff – “[REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER]”

[RoseofTexas]

Much to do about nothing! This gem will be swept under the rug by the mediaWHORES to keep the BEAST from being tainted!!

[Pirate21]

Get Curt Weldon on it.

[cgk]

Funny that the Osama tape is released the same day the Barrett report is released.

Isn't it?

[mondonico]

"I wish it didn’t have all of this stuff – “[REDACTED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER]”"

Me too, but those are just the APPENDICES. Read Section V of the report (the first link), about IRS obstruction. Read appendix 16 about same.

[mewzilla]

If I understand the statute correctly, the IC had certain responsibilities when it came to informing Congress during the course of the investigation. My question has to do with whether those responsbilities are different regarding the final report. Can the IC, for example, withhold info from Congress in the final report?

[Sybeck1]

I calling my rep, Roger Wicker at lunch. Anyone else?

[LS]

Certainly J.D. Hayworth will release this!!

[cake_crumb]

“WHAT WE WERE PREVENTED FROM INVESTIGATING.”

Headline for every news story....NOT

[mewzilla]

I already called one of my critters.

The person I spoke to claimed not to know anything about it. But they'll get back to me.

[One_American]

In another call to Medlar on the same day, December 2, 1992, Cisneros indicated that an appointed position posed fewer problems than one for which he would eventually have to stand for election:

HC: Because, see what - what brings out the hatred is when you’re in a race. What - what has people working against you, and consultants going into your background, and, and - and runners going to the papers and leaving confidential packages on desks, and all that, is a race. They won’t do that, you know, if you’re just . . . an appointee. But what brings out the ­the - the - the (US), you know, the intensity and the hate, and so forth, is . . . is a race.

Cisneros told Medlar that, because the Democrats controlled Congress, he knew that he would be confirmed to a Cabinet position:

HC: (Laughing) But the difference there is the Democrats control Congress. . . .

Talk about a Culture of Corruption? The more I read, the more I realize that Cisneros is a total slimebag. Unfortunately it is probably a common trait among a great percentage of politicians and DC government people.