Posted on 12/29/2005 5:41:03 AM PST by .cnI redruM
WASHINGTON -- 'Tis the end of 2005 and time to look back. In politics what do I see? Well, I see the Republican party struggling against high seas. In the media the party is depicted as being in danger of losing to the Democrats in the off-year elections next fall. That probably will be the case, unless the Republicans have to run against the Democrats. Against the Democrats they could win with Warren Harding in the White House.
The reason for this is that the Democratic leadership is fractured and dominated by people who are hysterical, abusive and oblivious. The things they have called George W. Bush this past year are as excessive as anything Joe McCarthy ever called his opponents, but without the charm or, for that matter, the factual basis. Not only that but they are feeding on their own. They have now made Sen. Joe Lieberman controversial and among the Democrats' left-wingers, objectionable.
His transgression is to treat a war as a serious matter and demur from criticizing the government in a way that might encourage our enemies. He is also consistent. As a Democrat, he has stood by the principles outlined by Harry Truman in the Truman Doctrine. In sum: "I believe that it must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures." President Truman enunciated that principle before a joint session of Congress on March 12, 1947, after which he defied the last of America's isolationists and sought appropriations to take up the position of faltering Great Britain in Greece and Turkey.
When Truman announced this policy there were opponents in the Republican party who rolled out a critique that was complex, as analytical as the critiques of the present policy excogitated by the Democratic leadership, and as wrong. The Republican isolationists were a vanishing breed, and the more I read about them the more I am reminded of the present Democratic leadership. They have the same abusive style and the same obliviousness. Dr. Howard Dean, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and the delightful Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid sound like partisans who have never met anyone who was not just like them. When Sen. Reid was hooted at for bragging "We killed the Patriot Act," I wonder if he was surprised. Doubtless he did not even hear his critics, or if he did he dismissed them as being hellish Republicans.
The death this year of the long-time Democratic activist Penn Kemble reminds me that among Democrats there is an alternative to these provincials. Kemble, who died of cancer at age 64, began his political life as a civil-rights demonstrator. On his death bed I saw him listening to a tape of Negro spirituals being sung by Bayard Rustin, a black civil-rights leader who like Penn, who was white, never lost his faith in America or in its essential goodness. Kemble was an ardent believer in the labor movement, but from all I could tell was open to technological developments that might increase the productivity of workers. Convinced of the imperative of America's Democratic values, Kemble favored the use of American strength in the world. Where he might have disagreed with the president he was always measured and restrained. And there were limits to his partisanship. In the three decades that I socialized with him and played handball I am sure that we disagreed on things, but we never had an argument. I walked away from his presence understanding his position and he walked away understanding mine. We never doubted each other's good motives. I can tell you this sort of comity is very rare on Capitol Hill. The last time I was there I frankly was amazed by the lack of trust and respect on both sides.
I think what is at the heart of the Democratic leadership's rants and partisanship is a refusal to admit the opposition's good motives. Second there is a refusal to understand the opposition's policies. As the Republicans' policies, both domestic and in foreign policy, are adaptions to the way the world is, that leaves the Democratic leadership in denial of the way the world is. It is this denial that will ensure the party's continued decline. The Democrats do have an alternative. Joe Lieberman is from the same wing of the party as Penn Kemble, and he is equally civilized. My guess is that the Democratic rank and file will in the years ahead side with Lieberman. That is the intelligent future for the party and there are still plenty of intelligent Democrats. It is just that they are not numbered with the likes of Reid.
This is getting repetitive.
Wrong!! It is the affluent and articulate white rank and file of the DemonRat party that's driven it to the left, patronizes DU, and supports Michael Moore. Those individuals are why McGovern won in 1972, they are even stronger in the party now than then, and they're not going to change. Anyone who thinks that party's problem isn't its rank and file only needs to look at the recent SF referenda where that group voted, in effect, to repeal the Second Amendment and to ban military recruiting.
I disagree, if they keep on the way they are going they will continue to keep losing elections. the only way they win is by pretending to be centerist. No party will continue for long if they keep losing. At some point there will be a counter-coup to the 1968 group that has taken over the party...or the democrat party will go away.
One mans opinion freely given...and worth almost that much
The real problem is that the MSM still is whooping it up that the Dems will get the House and Senate and even state gouv races. Just in the past week, 3 artlcles alone have talked about trouble for the Pubs and that in 7 states, the DEMs may even win 7 Senate seats. Then they look for W's impeachment. Unless the Pubs can overcome the lies and wishes of the MSM, there are enough leftists in the blue states to finally win some borderline races. Even in the red states, Pubs do not have a great class on newcomers running. So before we trump the Dems, we have to have a great team of new people to show how the Dems are just socialists and cut and runners. Pubs do not do well in publicity and unless they improve, 2006 could still be a bloodbath. My fear is that the GOPers will be apathetic in many of these races.
The thing no one will discuss is the black vote - dems depend on them heavily, yet do NOTHING for them. Now they've lost a huge sector down in New Orleans because many moved and been helped (largely, by private Christian and conservative groups and neighboring states - All Reps).
This sector will be diluted into those same Republican states and leave Louisiana without a huge democratic base which they formerly relied upon prior to Katrina. Worth keeping an eye on during election -06 cycle.
"Wrong!! It is the affluent and articulate white rank and file of the DemonRat party that's driven it to the left..."
I agree. Leftie friends I know consider Leiberman a republican in all but name and believe that the party isn't leftist enough - not by a long shot. What's striking is their self-delusion that the public can't wait to vote for a far, far left socialist candidate.
They have forgotten that elections are won closer to the middle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.