Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. puts sanctions on Chinese firms for aiding Tehran
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | December 27, 2005 | By Bill Gertz

Posted on 12/27/2005 5:20:48 AM PST by .cnI redruM

Several Chinese companies involved in selling missile goods and chemical-arms materials to Iran have been hit with U.S. sanctions, Bush administration officials said yesterday.

The sanctions cover six Chinese government-run companies, two Indian firms and one Austrian company, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The penalties have been under consideration since April and were approved by Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick within the past several weeks.

An announcement will be published in the U.S. government's Federal Register in the next several days -- and perhaps as early as today, the officials said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; billgertz; chemweapons; china; iran; irannukes; missiles; sanctions; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last
THis may be the build-up to a new war. That would be sad, but that's how it worked w/ Japan, prior to WWII and with Iraq, prior to Iraqi Freedom.
1 posted on 12/27/2005 5:20:49 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
BUY AMERICAN

2 posted on 12/27/2005 5:25:54 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

bump


3 posted on 12/27/2005 5:26:13 AM PST by F14 Pilot (Democracy is a process not a product)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

and they got their missile tech from , WHO?


4 posted on 12/27/2005 5:57:38 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

>>>six Chinese government-run companies, two Indian firms and one Austrian company


5 posted on 12/27/2005 5:59:01 AM PST by .cnI redruM (If you're gonna think, you might as well think big." - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
and they got their missile tech from , WHO?

I don't know, Clinton maybe?

6 posted on 12/27/2005 5:59:27 AM PST by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

China and Iran, strange bedfellows, no? Is it just business, or do the Chicoms have more sinister motives?


7 posted on 12/27/2005 6:24:48 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

I wonder who the Iranians hired to get the oil out of Iran??


8 posted on 12/27/2005 6:34:46 AM PST by Liberfighter (The NSA- The Ultimate Google)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
THis may be the build-up to a new war.

I don't agree. I think this IS the new war.

Who has the most to gain from the US expending our military budget on the War on Terror, leaving little left to take on other threats? Who has the most to gain from our existing military being restructured to fight a Third-world IED/guerilla conflict rather than an opponent with a huge conventional army and credible air force?

I think when it all comes out, we fill find that a lot of the Islamist players were Chinese proxies

9 posted on 12/27/2005 6:38:55 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

"THis may be the build-up to a new war."

Seems they have been sanctioned before....

"The officials said that three of the Chinese companies have been sanctioned in the past for illicit arms transfers -- CATIC, NORINCO and Zibo.
"NORINCO is a serial proliferator," one official said. "All these sanctions are for transfers to Iran."
The 2000 law requires the U.S. government to impose sanctions on companies or people that supply Iran with goods, services or technology related to nuclear weapons, missiles and toxic chemicals that can be used to make chemical arms.
Zibo is known to make glass-lined containers that can be used to make chemical weapons. CATIC and Norinco are involved in manufacturing missiles."


10 posted on 12/27/2005 6:40:43 AM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
China is our enemy. I am taken back by Americans lack of understanding of China's motives.

Rapid military buildup over the last 15 years.
Currency manipulation.
Huge trade imbalance.
Coddling of U.S. corporations in the name of global trade.
Stamping out human rights activist and freedom of religion.
Clamping down on the Internet/freedom of media.
Forcefully engaging Taiwan to quell Independence.
Helping our adversaries militarily from nuke technology to advanced missile tech.
Deploying forward military bases all over the world disguised as shipping and trade. Panama canal, disputed islands from Japan to the Philippines.
Formidable spy and covert intelligence operations against America and her allies.
Internet hacking attacks formulated and carried out by the Chinese military to probe for weakness in corporate networks.

You can't believe everything you read or hear, but if you research long enough, multiple sources, you begin to see patterns that are largely ignored by our lawmakers until it slaps them in the face.
11 posted on 12/27/2005 6:52:10 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
and your car wont work!
12 posted on 12/27/2005 7:00:31 AM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Well said!! Too bad this isn't covered by the media. Hopefully, America will wake up before it's too late.


13 posted on 12/27/2005 7:07:43 AM PST by panaxanax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; ImaGraftedBranch

Ping.


14 posted on 12/27/2005 7:21:39 AM PST by Ultra Sonic 007 (The opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Study the Clinton years long enough, and the picture comes into focus, but good! I have been utterly shocked to see the Republican indifference when it came to China (and Mexico as a matter of fact).

How much of North Korea's program was Chinese derived? How much of Iran's current program was Chinese derived?

China's playing for keeps, and our leaders seem to just be playing.

We prevented Russia form gaining a foothold in Central and South America, but don't seem to think anything of China gaining a foothold there.


15 posted on 12/27/2005 7:29:21 AM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax
It could already be too late. I don't want to sound like an alarmist or conspiracy nut but, the Chinese economy has grown at double digits for several years with no end in sight. The military buildup is financed at double digits from this booming economy.

Two recent articles touted first the HUGE trade deficit in the U.S. with China, the other article reported on the HUGE trade surplus that China enjoys with the U.S.

If you put it together and you will see the delta between the deficit and surplus further exaggerates the problem in that to overcome the deficit, you must first overcome the difference between the two. I'm no economics major, but thats the simple math to it all.

Congress has allowed U.S. corporations to sell out the American people in the name of globalization. Cheap labor is the game. More dollars at the bottom line.

The corporation in which I am employed is a 40 Billion dollar company (40 Billion). That's larger than the GDP of many small countries, yet it's not enough.

My corporation farms out to China on a regular basis and are accelerating the pace as most U.S. corps are.

Placing all of this manufacturing technology and capital in a foreign country that is our adversary is a very dangerous game.
16 posted on 12/27/2005 7:32:31 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: illbenice

Boycott China, not Japan! LOL


17 posted on 12/27/2005 7:37:29 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Liberfighter

Why, Halliburton, of course!


18 posted on 12/27/2005 7:38:02 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor; Iris7
I don't agree. I think this IS the new war. Who has the most to gain from the US expending our military budget on the War on Terror, leaving little left to take on other threats? Who has the most to gain from our existing military being restructured to fight a Third-world IED/guerilla conflict rather than an opponent with a huge conventional army and credible air force?

I think when it all comes out, we fill find that a lot of the Islamist players were Chinese proxies

Very insightful. And we cannot forget our enemy that we've got to fight right here at home in our own government: Democrats.

Remaining vigilant to prevent them from keeping our intelligence services and special ops from learning the truth is key.

19 posted on 12/27/2005 7:38:17 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

The only hedge on selling out the American economy in favor of globalism that provides a potential enemy with the resources to build up it's military to regional strike capacity is the nuclear threat.

And in doing that a whole new can of worms has been opened.


20 posted on 12/27/2005 7:40:50 AM PST by Rebelbase (Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Not sure what's going on in Congress. Back in the late 70', early 80's there was this big America first movement.

I remember legislators passing bills to protect certain industries such as textile and steal. That's all gone now.
From auto to high tech, it's all going to the farm overseas.

I hate to bring this name up, but I just have'ta. Ross Perot was dead on the mark with the huge sucking sound of jobs leaving this country. Nafta, Gatt, Cafta and similar agreements have done little for the American people.

Perot was correct when he predicted we'd become a services oriented country. He predicted that our manufacturing base would be decimated here in the states.

The corporate push to lower wages here in this country is working away. For several years our corporation has frozen wages and increased cost of benefits. The wages in the tech industry are shrinking in America.

I thought it was quite comical when there was this corporate push through Nafta to increase the standard of living south of the border in Mexico. All kinds of manufacturing headed to Mexico. Now, over the last few years, corporations are pulling business from Mexico in favor of China and India because it cost TOO MUCH to do business in Mexico.

How funny!!!! Have you ever been to the border of U.S. and Mexico? The standard of living hasn't improved one ded-gum bit. Thousands of Americans lost their jobs to Nafta on the promise they would have dollars set aside to retrain them for new careers under the Nafta agreement--never happened. American corporate powerhouses hoodwinked the American people and Lawmakers into believing this was all good for America.
21 posted on 12/27/2005 7:47:39 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Well your correct when this assumption deals only with the United States. My question is, what about countries that are in the immediate vicinity to the Chinese mainland?

Japan, Philippines, Korea, Vietnam, Mongolia, Tibet, and so forth are under the threat not only by nuclear arms, but by way superior land and sea capabilities posed by the PRA.
22 posted on 12/27/2005 7:53:24 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

China certainly gains yardage while we're engulfed by the GWOT. I wonder how China's Assassin's Mace development is doing?


23 posted on 12/27/2005 7:54:39 AM PST by .cnI redruM (If you're gonna think, you might as well think big." - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
If you read the Pro-China website of Thomas Barnett, this almost seems plausible....I read your post, I read Barnett and think hmm...

http://www.keepmedia.com/ShowItemDetails.do?refID=19&item_id=1037812
24 posted on 12/27/2005 7:56:02 AM PST by .cnI redruM (If you're gonna think, you might as well think big." - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Some people think that globalization can be stopped.

It can't, short of some apocalyptic WWIII that destroys the global infrastructure and transportation facilities.

The best that can be hoped is that it's managed. China has a huge advantage in global trade due to low wages. But as it continues to industrialize, those wages will increase. By 2030, China will have a larger economy that the US. Again, there's nothing we can do about that. They have a much greater population and they are managing their economy through fascist techniques. Fascism works, despite the other negative consequences of it.

At some point the Chinese leadership may be willing to loosen their fascist control in order to obtain the benefits of democracy and laissez faire economics. But that's not going to happen until they believe they've caught up with the west, probably sometime in the next 50 years. Until then, we're just going to have to live with it.


25 posted on 12/27/2005 7:59:54 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

"My question is, what about countries that are in the immediate vicinity to the Chinese mainland?"

Soon to be tribute paying members of a Chinese Asian Empire.


26 posted on 12/27/2005 8:00:18 AM PST by Rebelbase (Green bean casserole is a culinary curse upon mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777; DoughtyOne; SauronOfMordor

"Show me a service economy and I'll show you a nation of servants."


... Mark Steyn, if I recall correctly.


27 posted on 12/27/2005 8:03:43 AM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (SAVE THE BRAINFOREST! Boycott the RED Dead Tree Media & NUKE the DNC Class Action Temper Tantrum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I have never understood why Congress and various Presidents have allowed China to destroy our manufacturing gross national product with cheap junk.

We need to get back to buying American.

28 posted on 12/27/2005 8:05:09 AM PST by Dustbunny (Christmas - Christ is the reason for the season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

this is just for show


29 posted on 12/27/2005 8:11:41 AM PST by cope85
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Hear, Hear...well said indeed!


30 posted on 12/27/2005 8:15:06 AM PST by oxcart (Remember Bush lied.......People DYED... THEIR FINGERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I'll believe, as will China, when we put sanctions on all of China. Otherwise we are pissing on our own leg.


31 posted on 12/27/2005 8:34:44 AM PST by no-to-illegals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

to understand and then believe "why"; one has to understand and believe congress doesn't have the best interests of the American people at heart, rather congress simply has full pockets of cash?

one has to believe something.....
I, at this point, would have to believe the "full pockets of cash" theory.


32 posted on 12/27/2005 8:48:48 AM PST by no-to-illegals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny

Is anything still made in America?


33 posted on 12/27/2005 8:52:16 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I agree with you in part, however I must disagree on another. America CAN do something about China's booming economy. Pass legislation penalizing China for manipulating it's currency thus giving unfair advantage in trade.

Apply sanctions for bad behavior, apply tariffs, enact legislation limiting the amount of capital U.S. corps can invest in the Chinese economy. Demand the trade gap become balanced or stop importing goods from China.


34 posted on 12/27/2005 8:54:31 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

Now that's funny.


35 posted on 12/27/2005 8:55:08 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger

Now that's even funnier.


36 posted on 12/27/2005 8:55:40 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
It's not China that feels these sanctions, or who will even care. It's the nut-bird running Iran.
37 posted on 12/27/2005 8:56:04 AM PST by .cnI redruM (If you're gonna think, you might as well think big." - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Is anything still made in America?"

Well, Graco still makes their car seats here...so far anyway.


38 posted on 12/27/2005 8:56:24 AM PST by neutronsgalore (Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: neutronsgalore

Thank goodness my car seat days are over! LOL


39 posted on 12/27/2005 8:58:18 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

This will have absolutely no affect at all unless the government of China is sanctioned. The trade will continue through a maze of shell companies, partnerships, and joint ventures. its kind of like peeing your self in a dark suit. It might make you feel warm for a little while, but no body is going to notice.


40 posted on 12/27/2005 9:00:06 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

"Hopefully, America will wake up before it's too late."
Sadly, when did America ever wake up before it was too late? Fortunatley, we know how to even the score and move ahead better than anyone.


41 posted on 12/27/2005 9:35:50 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
From auto to high tech, it's all going to the farm overseas.

The Columbus dispatch did an article about INsourcing. In Ohio, 1 out of 20 jobs are from foreign companies or about 220,000 jobs with Honda being the largest foreign employer. So a lot of jobs are actually coming here.

42 posted on 12/27/2005 9:44:58 AM PST by staytrue (MOONBAT conservatives are those who would rather lose to a liberal than support a moderate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

"Sadly, when did America ever wake up before it was too late? Fortunatley, we know how to even the score and move ahead better than anyone."

True, but we never had as much war-usable industrial capacity burned away as we have. Evening the score and moving ahead might be at the cost of having to obliterate China with nukes in order to win any war with them.


43 posted on 12/27/2005 10:08:59 AM PST by neutronsgalore (Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
If the west quit propping up China, it's banking system would collapse. End of story. China already has enough trouble trying to keep things balanced as it is.

The down side is that we are financing the leading challenge to our world view. The question that some folks refuse to face, is do we want China's world veiw or our own to dominate?

Well?
44 posted on 12/27/2005 10:40:32 AM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777; Blurblogger

IMO, Capitalist policies are the best policies there are when used internally. IMO, Capitalism between nations of disparaging standards of living, is the most pariac system there is. While one state grows and strengthens dispraportionately, the other weakens disproportionately.

Have our standards of living increased between 1990 and 2005, as much as they did at 15 year intervals from 1950 on? I don't think they have, and I believe our trade policies are the reason why.

We can point to bright spots to be sure. The question is, how many more bright spots would there have been if we had practiced the same policies that made our nation grow between 1940 and 1990?

A few years ago, we were the ONLY world nation that practiced a trade deficit with China. If it was such a great idea to do so, wouldn't you think one other nation would have bought into it?

IMO, we have sold our souls for the obvious reasons, resulting in the creation of a major world threat. If only those who benefited from this were the ones to take the brunt of the results, but then they never are.


45 posted on 12/27/2005 10:49:29 AM PST by DoughtyOne (MSM: Public support for war waining. 403/3 House vote against pullout vaporizes another lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I think the truth is that we're so heavily invested in China that a collapse there would hurt us here so badly that we wish to avoid it.

I guess the flip side to that argument is that China is heavily invested in America that launching a war against us is unthinkable from their perspective.

China is still very much a work in progress. In the past 25 years it has abandoned communism in practice, although not in name. It is clearly a capitalist country today, although the heavy hand of government in regulating (and in partial ownership of) businesses reveals that it is now fascist.

That is a quantum improvement for the standard of living for the Chinese people, if nothing else. They will add another 1 million cars to Chinese roads in 2006. This is a country where only government officials and state monopolies had vehicles 30 years ago.

Chinese officials are remarkably candid today in discussing the moves they made since then. They openly admit that at the time of Tianamen Square, they faced a choice. Democracy or catching up to the west economically. They chose the latter in the hopes that democracy can wait. So far it's worked out for them.

I don't see China actively promoting its world view on anyone. Hell, they won't even do it in the one country most dependent on them, North Korea. If they won't do it there, I don't think we have anything to worry about with exported Chinese world views.

46 posted on 12/27/2005 11:02:54 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
"NORINCO is a serial proliferator," one official said. "All these sanctions are for transfers to Iran."

Let's not forget the attempted delivery of 2000 AK's to Los Angeles street gangs

47 posted on 12/27/2005 11:06:38 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the hubris to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Thank goodness my car seat days are over! LOL"

Makes a good thing to donate to the needy too.


48 posted on 12/27/2005 11:26:29 AM PST by neutronsgalore (Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: neutronsgalore

Believe me, by the time my kids had finished with theirs, no one would have wanted them. I did donate the cribs to the local agency for poor pregnant women, though.:)


49 posted on 12/27/2005 11:29:14 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

"Believe me, by the time my kids had finished with theirs, no one would have wanted them."

I meant buying new ones for the purpose of donating them.

"I did donate the cribs to the local agency for poor pregnant women, though."

Sounds like a good idea for when our son is out of his.


50 posted on 12/27/2005 12:14:21 PM PST by neutronsgalore (Waffling George has failed to secure the borders...now it's Bouncing Betty's turn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson