Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH'S SNOOPGATE - Jonathan Alter's Newsweek Web-Exclusive Commentary
Newsweek On-Line ^ | 12/19/05 | Jonathan Alter

Posted on 12/21/2005 5:25:25 AM PST by Kimberly GG

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: randita

Alter, the lefty loon, will be on with O'Reilly tonight...unfortunately not for as long as Hewitt had him. Bill already lit into his comments last night.


22 posted on 12/21/2005 5:44:20 AM PST by pookie18 ((Hillary Rotten) Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: randita

Yes, he really showed how completely ill-informed Alter was on very topic he was writing.


23 posted on 12/21/2005 5:45:05 AM PST by guinnessman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: P-40

"Newsweek. Now there's a winner."....Alter,Alterman same litter box........The Oliphants same.........


24 posted on 12/21/2005 5:46:56 AM PST by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I'm still waiting on Michael Moore's analysis of this. And what about Wavy Gravy, has he chimed in yet? Kanye West?

About as legit as a Jonathan Alter Newsweek piece.


25 posted on 12/21/2005 5:47:59 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Never trust anyone who always looks like they're ready to burst into tear. Alter has a permanent pout on his face.


26 posted on 12/21/2005 5:51:03 AM PST by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG
If President Bush acted like a dictator Jonathan Alter would be in prison.

Now that I think about it, if we enforced the sedition laws Jonathan Alter would be in prison.

27 posted on 12/21/2005 5:56:28 AM PST by Thom Pain (Supporting the Constitution is NOT right wing. It is centrist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Nobody believes anything this Leftie says anymore. he couldn't review Mary Mapes book in the NYT Review of Books without talking out of both sides of his mouth.


28 posted on 12/21/2005 6:03:42 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister

This punk was on Imus a few years ago and asked Imus where he got the tapes of Richard Nixon and General Patton. Imus had to inform him that they were done by his staff, that Nixon and Patton were dead. He is so out of it that he can only write for a rag like Newsweek.


29 posted on 12/21/2005 6:03:49 AM PST by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Jhensy
... I'm still waiting on Michael Moore's analysis of this. And what about Wavy Gravy, has he chimed in yet? Kanye West? ...

And Tookie William's opinion ....... no ..... wait .....
30 posted on 12/21/2005 6:05:49 AM PST by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

Alter=liberal agenda!

Alter does not work for me.


31 posted on 12/21/2005 6:07:16 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

Every President since Roosevelt has asserted and exercised the inherent authority to wiretap foreign powers for national security purposes without a warrant.

Alter's entire opinion on the subject is based on a completely false premise, namely that it is illegal and unconstitutional for a President to do this. To the contrary, no court considering the question has ever said that, and all courts commenting on the subject have expressly recognized the President's inherent authority. Congress in passing FISA and the 9/14/01 resolution also recognized the President's inherent authority. Congress has no authority to impair the President's inherent Article II powers. If resort must be made to the statute, the use of force was authorized, and this type of surveillance is inherent in and a necessary concomitant to the use of force, just like detention was found to be in the Hamdi (or is Hamdan) case.

So, the lefty position on this issue is wrong, ignorant and stoopid. God Bless Hugh Hewitt, and thanks to Jonathan Alter for revealing himself to be such a clown. The left's position is also extremely dangerous and extremely foolish politically. Their platform now consists of a high pitched nasal whine that George Bush is awfully mean to terrorists. Yes, he certainly is.

Strategery or not, the left has now rushed into a position which is wrong, stupid, dangerous, and politically insane. Right where we want 'em. Life is Good!


32 posted on 12/21/2005 6:14:37 AM PST by Buckhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
"Dec. 19, 2005 - Finally we have a Washington scandal that goes beyond sex, corruption and political intrigue to big issues like security versus liberty and the reasonable bounds of presidential power."

Yeah, and I bet Alter has written countless columns demanding the release of the Barrett Report also - NOT.

33 posted on 12/21/2005 6:16:15 AM PST by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

NewsLEAK...Sen. Levin, call your office!


34 posted on 12/21/2005 6:16:18 AM PST by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mortal19440
asked Imus where he got the tapes of Richard Nixon and General Patton

Alter must have missed Bartlett's tagline: "This is the LATE Richard M. Nixon".

What a doofus!

35 posted on 12/21/2005 6:32:11 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"......the reasonable bounds of presidential power."


Obviously the Barrett report fits within the Clintons "reasonable bounds of presidential power". See there is never too much power when a liberal is in office and it is their Constitutional duty to do whatever it takes to maintain power. Alter personally had nothing to fear from Clintonism and there is nobody more important than liberals are to themselves.
36 posted on 12/21/2005 6:37:02 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GW and Twins Pawpaw
Only the most rabid of anarchist moonbats seriously thinks that George W. Bush can be taken out of office.

However, liberals seem happy with just smearing the president with as much trash and fecal matter as they can so that history will always look down on George W. Bush's administration.

Those history book had better show that the "anti(American)war movement" was partnered with international communists from the start.

How many asterisks are going to need to be in the books to explain that all of this trash set no precedent? And by that I don't mean "everybody does it" but rather than NOTHING UNCONSTITUTIONAL has happened. Unless we are going to appeal to activist courts that reinterpret and redefine the "living document" at (partisan agenda influenced) will.
37 posted on 12/21/2005 6:40:45 AM PST by weegee (Christmas - the holiday that dare not speak its name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG; All
Some background:

The Legality of the NSA's Intercept Program--Well, there it goes as far as we're concerned. The left is still hanging onto it, tooth and nail--and talking impeachment. It's just plain sickening.
Power Line ^ | 12/20/05 | John Hinderaker
 
Victoria Toensing & James Bamford Discussing FISA on C-SPAN Now--This article explains fully how the president can legally wiretap US citizens without a warrant. It cites the law, something the left is loathe to actually do.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20621
 
“Bush Spying Story” Is Four Years Old--Somehow the geeky Wired News managed to scoop the vaunted New York Times by more than four years...
 
Why Bush Approved the Wiretaps (including FISA roadblock with Moussaoui)
--Has the DNC not been paying attention? Pelosi and Reid have ADMITTED publicly they were briefed. OMG
 Not to mention, they ALL voted on the Amendment to the FISA:
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004: “Lone Wolf” Amendment to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
House Vote
This is getting too easy.
 
Echelon; Worldwide Conversations Being Received (Transcript of 60 Minutes)
 
Jimmy Carter Assumed Same Spy Power As Bush

38 posted on 12/21/2005 6:46:41 AM PST by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I have to wonder why the President was so naive as to believe that he could dissuade Sulzberger from publishing the details of this surveillance program. If anything, he was inviting him to do so by the expedient of a face to face meeting (which Sulzberger probably demanded as the price for hearing the President out). How did we go from Dick Cheney's comments about Adam Clymer (which show that both he and the President had a pretty good idea of where the NYT stood editorially), to having guys like Scooter Libby literally "sleeping with the enemy"?


39 posted on 12/21/2005 6:48:56 AM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

I wonder if "Senator Depends" (Leaky Leahy )had anything to do with this?


40 posted on 12/21/2005 7:01:58 AM PST by Buffettfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson