Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Miami Seaplane Lost Wing Before Crash
airwise news, reuters ^ | December 21, 2005 | staff

Posted on 12/21/2005 5:07:00 AM PST by saganite

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Thermalseeker
if I may...The comparsion is valid; the number of landing/takeoff cycles for this aircraft far exceeded the expected cycles for air service...the operator would be landing every 60 minutes or so, all day long.

That coupled with landing on the water, with the hull bouncing off the waves, which would flex the wings excessively...makes one wonder how the aircraft held up this long...

It has been announced that cracks were found in the main spar...
41 posted on 12/21/2005 3:01:23 PM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: thinking

I'll go out on a limb here and suggest the turboprop engines which were retrofitted on this aircraft had a lot to do with it.


42 posted on 12/21/2005 3:17:37 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
"Remember the Hawaiian Airlines plane that lost the top of the fuselage because of metal fatigue"

Yes, but these planes don't get high enough to even be pressurized. It is not like the Hawaiian plane where it is being pressurized while six miles up in the sky and then coming back down to sea level. At least back when I flew on one of these planes, back when it had radial piston engines, the plane hardly got off the ground.
43 posted on 12/21/2005 3:53:38 PM PST by Ninian Dryhope ("Bush lied, people dyed. Their fingers." The inestimable Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I support that...was going to include that observation...I can imagine that the turbos impacted plenty of torgue on the wing spar....


44 posted on 12/21/2005 4:03:41 PM PST by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: saganite

I figured as much.


45 posted on 12/21/2005 4:34:51 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: saganite
re: It was structural failure

That would certainly appear to be the case. Sad, especially since the cracks were all but invisible to the naked eye. You can bet the NTSB won't stop with the investigation at this point and simple declare it to have been the failure of that spar that resulted in the accident. They some very sophisticated tests and examination procedures to determine what part those stress fractures played in the accident and what caused them.

Truth is, I would have had no qualms about boarding that airplane for a trip to Bimini. As a long time pilot and aviation buff I would not have had a second thought about the safety of the aircraft. Certainly gives me pause for thought!
46 posted on 12/22/2005 6:10:10 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thinking
Not to mention the amount of saltwater spray that must make its way into and around the engine on every landing.
47 posted on 12/22/2005 6:11:31 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson