Skip to comments.
Online Encyclopedia Is A Gathering For Internet Predators (pedophiles at Wikipedia)
POE-News & Official Wire ^
| December 14, 2005
Posted on 12/20/2005 1:09:50 PM PST by lqclamar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: Borges
Our options:
1) Regime change - remove the scum running Wiki (hostile takeover, elections, or sth)
2) Overwhelming force - Edit so much that they can't spin or keep up with their lies
3) Increase supply - create a better website where objective MEANS objective
4) Nuclear strike - self-explanatory.
I'll have to think this over, but Wiki and the people who run it WILL NOT get away with this.
61
posted on
12/20/2005 2:06:43 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: twigs
Many of the Wikpedia articles are of merit. And one is free to edit them and discuss/debate the edits, which some obviously find stimulating. I and others were instrumental in changing the slant of Wikipedia's article on patriotism, which was written from the British and Eurowimp point of view and treated it as synonymous with jingoism. I was not aware of the articles dealing with pedophilia and would never defend them. I limited myself to the subjects of interest to me.
62
posted on
12/20/2005 2:06:57 PM PST
by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
To: Killborn
Baby raping sounds fine to me, and I actually hardly ever use the term "pedophilia" - but rather child molestation. I detest child molestation and child molesters and think most of them are irredeemable and should be put away for life or very close to it. That may get obscured once in a while by the mild, neutral way I attempt to use in all my discussions.
We can agree to disagree on the conflation of homosexuality and child molestation. I've seen the arguments; I don't find them persuasive, and I'm not much interested into getting dragged into another debate over it.
Whether or not homosexuals are somewhat more likely to molest children, the vast majority of child molestation victims are victims of heterosexual assault.
63
posted on
12/20/2005 2:07:43 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: lqclamar
"Remember the source though. "
Actually I did a bit more digging and even found a few pics (all soft by my definition). Take a look at the
wayback machine.
64
posted on
12/20/2005 2:08:22 PM PST
by
ndt
To: AntiGuv
I don't want to debate this too. I don't have the book with me and am too tired to try. At least we agree that the proper cure for "pedophilia" is an injection of .45 grain right behind the subject's right ear.
65
posted on
12/20/2005 2:10:13 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: Killborn
I vote 3. If you don't like a site stop visiting there.
66
posted on
12/20/2005 2:10:54 PM PST
by
Borges
To: Borges
That's number 5, ignore it and hope it won't influence the minds of sheeple.
67
posted on
12/20/2005 2:12:04 PM PST
by
Killborn
(Pres. Bush isn't Pres. Reagan. Then again, Pres. Regan isn't Pres. Washington. God bless them all.)
To: lqclamar
I don't know how any real researcher or scholar can take Wikipedia with any seriousness.
68
posted on
12/20/2005 2:12:30 PM PST
by
toddlintown
(Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
To: Killborn
Yes, putting them down is the most humane, effective, and just solution for everyone involved, IMHO..
69
posted on
12/20/2005 2:13:40 PM PST
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: bubman
Compare http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pedophilia&limit=500&action=history
with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_administrators
to see just how many wikipedia admins are also active editors on pedophilia topics and you get the picture of how bad it's gotten. It appears that one of the most active editors maintaining that page is actually a Wikipedia administrator named Willmcw and other administrators appear to have lots of edits there - Ta_bu_shi_da_yu, Everyking, RoyBoy
70
posted on
12/20/2005 2:25:23 PM PST
by
lqclamar
To: lqclamar
one of its highest level administrators is a disgraced ex-lawyer who got disbarred by a state supreme court for soliciting prostitutes. And goes by the name of CLinton by any chance?
71
posted on
12/20/2005 2:27:18 PM PST
by
ichabod1
(Sic Omnia Gloria Fugit)
To: ichabod1
And goes by the name of CLinton by any chance? Close, but no cigar (pun intended).
See the defendent here http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=co&vol=1999sc%5Csc0125a&invol=1
72
posted on
12/20/2005 2:29:56 PM PST
by
lqclamar
To: lqclamar
Then why not start wikirepublic. there's plenty of wiki clones using their software with different entries.
73
posted on
12/20/2005 3:34:35 PM PST
by
x5452
To: lqclamar
later read/miserable pingout.
Comment #75 Removed by Moderator
To: Sols
"Anyone who has the time or inclination to edit a pedophilia article should immediately be distrusted."
Not really. I envisage such articles would be written by criminal psychologists and pediatritians.
To: lqclamar
To: Powerclam
I havent found anything on iki that isn't verifyiable elsewhere if harder to locate since many encyclopedias online charge, but i haven't looked into any social or sexual topics on wiki either.
78
posted on
12/20/2005 5:48:30 PM PST
by
x5452
To: BenLurkin
Some argue they already have, with "Birth" (Nicole Kidman, Cameron Bright)
Actress Nicole Kidman ... as a fragile young widow who believes a 10-year-old boy is the reincarnation of her dead husband in ... Birth.
The disturbing film by up-and-coming director Jonathan Glazer has already stirred up controversy with provocative scenes of Kidman and the boy naked in a bathtub together.
In another shot, Kidmans character Anna tenderly kisses the young Sean after being convinced that he is indeed her long lost husband."
79
posted on
12/20/2005 6:02:22 PM PST
by
visualops
(www.visualops.com)
Comment #80 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson