Skip to comments.
Bill would make organ donation automatic for drivers in South Carolina
The Greenville News, SC ^
| Nov 30, 8:38 PM EST
| By JIM DAVENPORT
Posted on 12/06/2005 8:10:49 AM PST by Van Jenerette
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Not sure if this has been posted. If so...sorry; please scratch...FYI Sen. Rankin just switched from Democrat to Republican last year.
To: Van Jenerette
Please check your organs in before exiting the toll booth. You can pick them up on your return trip otherwise they will be forefeit.
To: Van Jenerette
This is a rather frightening proposal. Almost like mandatory harvesting!
3
posted on
12/06/2005 8:14:51 AM PST
by
mozrock
(They're not people, they're hippies!)
To: Van Jenerette
Rankin has a bill that would create universal pre-kindergarten for 4-year-olds. "It's time to do it," he said. Every effort to bring education to early childhood has helped create "brighter and better equipped" children, Rankin said. He has no estimate of the cost. RINO.
4
posted on
12/06/2005 8:14:57 AM PST
by
thulldud
(The Democratic military vote is the REAL "Army of One".)
To: mozrock
I read it that way too. The older I get, the less I like organ donation, even though I can see good in it too.
5
posted on
12/06/2005 8:16:09 AM PST
by
twigs
To: Van Jenerette
I'm sorry....I will determine when and if my organs get harvested.
6
posted on
12/06/2005 8:16:33 AM PST
by
Vaquero
("An armed society is a polite society" R. A. Heinlein)
To: mozrock
But the legislation says unless applicants can prove they are an organ donor or sign a form saying they don't want to become one, they cannot get drivers' licenses. Want to make it really interesting? Amend this to apply to motorcycle licenses only!
7
posted on
12/06/2005 8:17:20 AM PST
by
thulldud
(The Democratic military vote is the REAL "Army of One".)
To: Van Jenerette
Organ donation "ought to be the rule rather than the exception," Rankin said
SAYS WHO????? While organ donation is an admirable selfless act, it needs to remain a matter of personal consideration and consent. It affects the entire family, and has religious or other deep psychological considerations for some people. The body is a marvelous machine but it does belong to the individual and in passing, the next of kin/family. This arrogant presumption makes a dead human body .... a public resource. If that is the case, why stop at traffic victims? Why not grab the body of anyone who dies for any reason?
8
posted on
12/06/2005 8:17:29 AM PST
by
silverleaf
(Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
To: Van Jenerette
Bill would make organ donation automatic for drivers No thank you.
9
posted on
12/06/2005 8:17:58 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Lying About My Sign-Up Date Since 1998)
To: Van Jenerette
To: mozrock; twigs
Okay. If roadkill, why not prisoners? Or vice versa?
11
posted on
12/06/2005 8:20:11 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Van Jenerette
The Republican said it is not an attempt to mandate organ donation Had me fooled. This is flat out wrong. It's disgraceful that an elected official would propose such a law. He should be recalled or forced to resign by his constituents.
12
posted on
12/06/2005 8:20:23 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: Van Jenerette
13
posted on
12/06/2005 8:21:43 AM PST
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: paul51
FYI Sen. Rankin just switched from Democrat to Republican last year.
14
posted on
12/06/2005 8:22:19 AM PST
by
Van Jenerette
(Our Republic...If We Can Keep It!)
To: silverleaf; Lazamataz; Van Jenerette
This arrogant presumption makes a dead human body .... a public resource.And once that happens, why not apply New Eminent Domain?
"Excuse me sir, your body parts could be put to much better use over here because he pays more taxes than you ever will.....please lie down on this table."
15
posted on
12/06/2005 8:23:47 AM PST
by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Van Jenerette
Where in the Constitution was the government given ownership of our bodies?
If someone owns their body they should be able to sell their parts.
Only those with a socialist mindset would consider the state for use as a good way to fairly allocate resources that do not actually belong to the state.
16
posted on
12/06/2005 8:25:37 AM PST
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: twigs
You should die with all your organs intact so they can rot away with the rest of yiour body. Why give them to someone else who might live longer with them. Let nature take its course.
17
posted on
12/06/2005 8:25:55 AM PST
by
bigsigh
To: Van Jenerette
To: Van Jenerette
This is both outrageous and frightening.
19
posted on
12/06/2005 8:26:41 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson