bill's bud explains1....
Posted on 11/26/2005 10:43:46 AM PST by Mia T
bill's bud explains1....
|
Hillary, it seems, is not only "watching me like a hawk," as Bill puts it at one point,1
but she has someone else watching her fun-loving husband.
Based on what happens next, one is forced to conclude that one, Bill Clinton would not have become president if not for Hillary;1
The Wall Street Journal thanx to WorkingClassFilth for the video
In a letter to Mrs. Clinton recalling their meeting shortly after the reported assault occurred, she wondered about the significance of Mrs. Clinton's words to her at that time. Thank you, Mrs. Broaddrick says Mrs. Clinton told her, for "everything you do for Bill."
and three, Bill Clinton owes Hillary Rodham big time for what she has done for him,1
 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
A final note: This is the debut production of the Audrey Skirball Kenis Theater at the newly remodeled Geffen Playhouse. It's a warm, intimate second space certain to find much use in years to come. The opening piece is a corker.1
MY BUDDY BILL
|
Too many pundits, usually leftist and privileged, sneer at country music. To these critics, any music created by poor, Southern whites (at least those poor, Southern whites who didn't attend an Ivy League university) must be held in contempt, along with its correlatives: incest, racism and trailer parks.
Hillary Clinton? Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man? Where would she be now if she as a child had to pick cotton from sun up to sun down?
Tammy Wynette stands alone, a legend; and she will be admired wherever people appreciate the honesty of the human experience. Human beings are vulnerable. We all should be thankful to any artist courageous enough to bare her soul on the public stage so the rest of us who are listening and know whereof she speaks might benefit.
Sean Smith
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2005
Hillary Clinton?
Who would even know her name were it not for her attachment to a man?
Thank you, Gavin McNett, for your tribute to the incomparable Tammy Wynette. (TAMMY WYNETTE, 1942-1998)
Fresno, Calif.
Salon.com
|
Rick Cleveland tells Bill Clinton stories in his one-man show. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bottom line: A must-see, must-hear show to open the fine new second space at the Geffen. |
|
She's preparing to be YOUR next President..
AND (jaws theme) shes very very hungry...
AND the american voteing public is very very dumb..(theme from the 3 stooges)
AND the Pubbies could care less about voter fraud...(theme from God Father)
AND wherever Hillary goes; so goes Bubba..(theme from Diddler on the Roof)..
AND American women are mostly Harpocrites(Oprah) whom loves Hillary..(theme from Jeopardy)..
It don't look good..
The only 'thing' that pops up, in my mind, is the balanced budget/deficit reduction .
Remember I want to mention only positive actions by the clintons.
Was it that the record tax hikes of 1993 that brought revenue to .... Well, spending was held down like for instance our defense spending. As records show a "steep plummet from 1992-2000, followed by an even steeper rise starting in 2001 that, as of 2004, still falls short of the 1992 level" (Stupid Budget Tricks)
Ok, I'm going to need help -- I can't really figure out what good was done during the clinton's 8 years in our House!!
|
the democrats are gonna get us killed (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) series5 by Mia T, 8.28.05  (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) |
Once we understand that, then the clintons' 'accomplishments' are as self-evident as they are self-serving.
For example:
Yet privately few clintonites would deny that bill clinton facilitated China espionage. Their only question is why. Some call clinton a quisling, a Manchurian Candidate, bought off in Little Rock by Riady and company decades ago (and much too cheaply, according to his Chinese benefactors), trading our national security for his political power. This argument is persuasive but incomplete; clinton, a certifiable megalomaniac, is driven ultimately by his solipsistic, messianic world view and by that which ultimately quashes all else -- his toxic legacy. William J. Broad suggests (Spying Isn't the Only Way to Learn About Nukes, The New York Times, May 30, 1999) that clinton had another reason to empower China and disembowel America. Broad argues that clinton sought to disseminate our atomic secrets proactively in order to implement his postmodern, quite inane epistemological theory, namely, that, contrary to currently held dogma, knowledge is not power after all -- that, indeed, precisely the opposite is the case. Broad writes in part: Since 1993, officials say, the Energy Department's "openness initiative" has released at least 178 categories of atom secrets. By contrast, the 1980s saw two such actions... Its overview of the disclosures, "Restricted Data Declassification Decisions," dated January 1999 and more than 140 pages long, lists such things as how atom bombs can be boosted in power, key steps in making hydrogen bombs, the minimum amount (8.8 pounds) of plutonium or uranium fuel needed for an atom bomb and the maximum time it takes an exploding atomic bomb to ignite an H-bomb's hydrogen fuel (100 millionths of a second). No grade-B physicist from any university could figure this stuff. It took decades of experience gained at a cost of more than $400 billion. The release of the secrets started as a high-stakes bet that openness would lessen, not increase, the world's vulnerability to nuclear arms and war. John Holum, who heads arms control at the State Department, told Congress last year that the test ban "essentially eliminates" the possibility of a renewed international race to develop new kinds of nuclear arms... "The United States must stand as leader," O'Leary told a packed news conference in December 1993 upon starting the process. "We are declassifying the largest amount of information in the history of the department." Critics, however, say the former secrets are extremely valuable to foreign powers intent on making nuclear headway. Gaffney, the former Reagan official, disparaged the giveaway as "dangling goodies in front of people to get them to sign up into our arms-control agenda." Thomas B. Cochran,:..."In terms of the phenomenology of nuclear weapons...the cat is out of the bag." ...[F]ormer Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said the "extensive declassification" of secrets had inadvertently aided the global spread of deadly weapons. ["inadvertently" ???!!!!] Broad would have us believe we are watching "Being There" and not "The Manchurian Candidate." His argument is superficially appealing as most reasonable people would conclude that it requires the simplemindedness of a Chauncy Gardener (in "Being There") to reason that instructing China and a motley assortment of terrorist nations on how to beef up their atom bombs and how not to omit the "key steps" when building hydrogen bombs would somehow blunt and not stimulate their appetites for bigger and better bombs and a higher position in the power food chain. But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton pushing the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times. But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies. The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare. Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995. (Similar motivation (and danger) in clinton's arm-twisting, phony rapprochement in the Mideast.) According to James Risen and Jeff Gerth of The New York Times, "the legacy codes and the warhead data that goes with them" -- apparently stolen from the Los Alamos weapons lab by scientist, Wen Ho Lee aided and abetted by bill clinton, hillary clinton, the late Ron Brown, Sandy Berger, Hazel O'Leary, Janet Reno, Eric Holder and others in the clinton administration [not to mention congressional clinton accomplices Glenn, Daschle, Bumpers, Harkin, Boxer, Feinstein, Lantos, Levin. Lautenberg, Torricelli et al.] -- "could [especially when combined with the supercomputers that clinton sold to China to help them finish the job] be particularly valuable for a country, like China, that has signed onto the nuclear test ban treaty and relies solely on computer simulations to upgrade and maintain its nuclear arsenal. The legacy codes are now used to maintain the American nuclear arsenal through computer simulation. Most of Lee's transfers occurred in 1994 and 1995, just before China signed the test ban treaty in 1996, according to American officials." Few who have observed clinton would argue against the proposition that this legacy-obsessed megalomaniac would trade our legacy codes for his rehabilitated legacy in a Monica minute and to hell with "the children." HILLARY IS NIXON-PLUS part 2
audio
BEWARE THE SYNERGY
Nixonian paranoia and fascistic mindset combine with
clintonian megalomania, ineptitude and, most important, easy betrayal of America
to make hillary clinton deadly dangerous for us all.
MIA T, 7.09.05
|
.
BILL CLINTON =
Was on the side of our terrroist eneny, Communist North Vietnam Dictator HO CHI MINH, and against we American Soldiers then fighting him on behalf of FREEDOM for a then Free South Vietnam. And so was DIANE* RODHAM (*HILLARY)
While President of the United States went down to Central America to apologize to the people there for our having fought on the wrong side against CASTRO-Backed Communists trying to take that area of the world over during the early 1980's. Later stated that there should not be just one SuperPower in the World like us, but rather all nations should be playing on the same level playing field
After leaving our Oval Office this former President of the United States publically stated in the world's Press that "There might not even be an America around in 300 years"
The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been
.
|
C-SPAN asked noted presidential historians to rank the American presidents1 along the following ten dimensions: public persuasion, crisis leadership, economic management, moral authority, international relations, administrative skills, relations with congress, vision/setting an agenda, pursued equal justice for all, and performance within context of times. bill clinton emerged as middling in most dimensions; he was surpassed in others by a settled mediocrity (Carter) and a putative failure (Nixon). In moral authority, bill clinton was rated dead last.2 He did fairly well in public persuasion, not a surprising finding given the volume of snake oil he managed to peddle during his presidency. "It's not the economy, stupid!" Clinton's best scores were on the economic management and pursued equal justice for all dimensions. However, both of these results are meaningful only insofar as they redound to the moral authority dimension: they are wholly based on clinton fraudulence, cooked books and black poses, respectively; and clinton's shameless Rosa Parks eulogy last week assured us that the insidious brand of clinton racism is alive and well during these tiptoe years of what the clintons hope will be their interregnum. Note that although Brinkley doesn't place much importance on the economic management dimension--he argues that the economy variable is not durable over time--he fails to recognize that the evaluation of the clinton economy by the historians is erroneous to begin with. Note also that contrary to Douglas Brinkley's claim, made at the clinton revisionist confab3, C-SPAN historians found no evidence of clinton "greatness" irrespective of his moral-authority deficit. MIDDLING Twenty presidents rank higher than bill clinton and 20 rank lower. But this placement assumes equal weight for each of the dimensions. And therein lies the flaw. If 9/11 taught us anything, it is that presidential character and moral authority count, and count most.4 If the variables are properly weighted, bill clinton will always come out dead last. That is, unless Americans are dumb enough to make the same mistake twice.5 Historian massages clinton numbers, ego + legacy at revisionist confab
|
excellent ;)
bump
Then the republicans in power had better quit spending my money like tax and spend liberals. Grow some balls and stand up for conervatives and America.
At once hillary-ous and repugnant.
(The repugnance part is a bit like gilding the lily, don't you think?) ;)
The clintons are counting on the tiger (elephant?) not changing its stripes and the conservatives bolting. (In fact, I suspect hillary running will make the GOP even less responsive.)
We must focus on the clintons. They can win only if we let them. We can deal with the GOP after we eliminate the larger threat.
Well rounded and comprehensive, Mia. Good job!
thanx. :)
Perhaps too much shark, not enough turkey (the tryptophan will do wonders ) ;) Peter Benchley, Jaws
(idea by PJ-Comix, metaphor + logo by Jon Hein)
by Mia T, 9.01.05
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
PLAY MOVIE
Thanks again. Bump to the top.
*****************************
Here is another question................... did the sappy communist agent from Chicago have a POWER FIST on the back of her graduation gown .............. or is that UNTRUE???
This picture, if it is available, would doom the sick woman and save this country.
We need a picture of the BEAST with the black power fist on the back of her graduation tent!
If she did.................. lets see it.
I have heard from (Quinn@warroom.com ) that that is true.
I do not know if it is true.
Anyone know????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Having failed to snare the Nobel Peace Prize 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available 
The clintons, as is their wont, are now taking this 
Defeating the enemy on the battlefield isn't sufficient. For America to prevail, she must also defeat a retrograde, misogynous, troglodyte mindset. To successfully prosecute the War on Terror, it is essential that the collective patriarchal islamic culture perceives America as politically and militarily strong. 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available 
