Desperate for Defeat (The Democrats' greatest fear is an America that's winning.)

The American Prowler ^ | 11/22/2005 | George Neumayr

[Dan(9698)]

This is not new to the Democrats.

Harry Truman did it in Korea.

LBJ did it in Vietnam.

Clinton did it in Somalia, and Kosovo.

Normal to them.

[timestax]

Posted by nickcarraway On 11/22/2005 12:51:21 AM EST The American Prowler ^ | 11/22/2005 | George Neumayr The foreign policy of the Democratic Party verges on deliberate defeatism: afraid of American "dominance" in the world, many Democrats would prefer that America tie wars than win them. Because they would like to see America put in its place -- this isn't an overstatement; just listen to the Democrats' constant complaints about America's lone "superpower" status -- their contribution to the war effort is defined by deep ambivalence.

The liberal DemoncRATS are sick Communists. They are losers. Oh, and TRAITORS too!

[Gondring]

ping

[Waco]

Our "lone" Super Power status? Yes!! Now RATS, yer #2 just STFU and STAY that way. You'll really enjoy it, and the USA will be better off. GO AWAY RED RATS!!!!

[Christian4Bush]

bump

[FairOpinion]

Almost a good article, but even this author gives too much credit to the Democrats when he says:

"They don't necessarily want their country to lose, but they are not so sure if they want it to win either."

From their actions it's clear that Dems DO WANT THE US TO LOSE, and lose badly.

[timestax]

bump

[bybybill]

9/11
9/11
9/11
9/11
9/11, never again, support the war, support the troops, and, if you do, support the President

[timestax]

bttt

[Firefox1]

The Democrats are almost a fifth column in this country.

I look at their talking heads on the various tv shows and think, "If these guys get their way, the US will be absolutely humilated. More painful than that, a large portion of my countrymen (IE the Democrats) will be clinking wine glasses like they just won an election. Their attitude is obviously, 'The country as well as the concept of freedom and human rights can be be damned, as long as Bush looks bad.'

Don't get me wrong. Bush is at fault, too. He is a terrible communicator in the crunch. The average dude doesn't follow all the news closely and Bush just can't reach that person with his glib remarks and off handed sayings. I wish to God he had Tony Blair's flair with the English language. He's a good man but, let's get some more prepared speeches in front of him, ok.

I also blame the Iraqi's. We've paid a huge price for their infant democracy. So many of us want it to succeed not only for the sake of them but, for the sake of freedom. While they certainly enjoy what they now have (75% voted, Saddam gone, free press, etc), their strange sense of pride and the ruthlessness of their politics makes them awkward partners. How about some thanks? We're hanging on a line out here with these Dems at our throats! Must you see every thing as a way to leverage President Bush into giving you more? Throw us a line, already!

Finally, and in addition to the above, the new Prime Minister (to be elected as a result of the December 15th elections) better give President Bush some props in public. He also better get his guys in place. Freedom needs him to be strong....which is what makes me very nervous right now. If he leaves President Bush hanging (figurative speaking), the new Prime Minsiter will certainly be left hanging (literaly speaking!).

[Cobra64]

The article is excellent, but The American Prowler website is crap. You can't even email them to clean it up or forward an article without all the bull-sh!t attached.

[Plutarch]

This explains how the Democrats could stumble into the absurd position of saying that Iraq under Saddam Hussein was terrorist-free and that he just wasn't the sort of person to associate with Muslim terrorists. This whitewash of pre-war Iraq has become essential to the Democrats...

I've been to Iraq. Before Team America arrived, it was a land of flowery meadows and rainbow skies and rivers made of chocolate where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.

[timestax]

bttt

[hsalaw]

"Team America"

I laughed so hard at that movie, I almost hurt myself. I rented the DVD to watch the "behind the scenes" features, which were almost as good as the movie.

[Pajamajan]

"As inspector David Kay reported, Iraqi scientists were, up until the beginning of the war -were actively working to produce a biological weapon using the poison ricin-.We know that terrorists were passing through Iraq. And now we know that there was little control over Iraq's weapons capabilities...The country had the technology, the ability to produce, and there were terrorist groups passing through the country--and no central control. Iraq under Saddam Hussein was arguably more dangerous than even Bush had assumed"

Excellent article. Every single paragraph has a point that needs to be made to our citizens.

Do the democrats think that Saddam Hussein became LESS of a threat after 9/11? Were we supposed to trust the Up-to-its-Eyeballs-in-the-Oil-for-Food-scandal-UN to take care of Saddam?

Are they going to now, after we already have troops in harms way, after elections have been held, and while the Iraqi's are just starting to take control of their country from the terrorists- Are they really going to go back and say that it would have been better off with Saddam in charge?

It's too bad the Republican's let this go as long as they have- they should know by now that there is NO PRESS in America to tell people what's going on Iraq. And that the propagandists who call themselves "the press" operate 24/7 to destroy our war effort.

Hopefully they finally understand the scope and magnitude of dem propaganda- every movie, every TV show- every newspaper article- every news broadcast, every magazine article- every music radio broadcast- in every class room at all education levels elementary, Jr. High, High school, and college classroom, and nearly every movie and music star, spouts democrat propaganda- against the Iraq war, against our troops, and against our president. It is constant 24/7.

I am not the least bit surprised that this constant barrage of negativity has resulted in loss of public support for president Bush and the Iraq war- in spite of the succeses- elections being held..exc.. Succeses are not covered AT ALL. The only thing people have heard is the constant "quagmire" and "Viet Nam" statements of the dems.

The bully pulpit has been silent. President Bush has not addressed the nation about what's going on in Iraq, and reminded people of why we are there. I'd like to see him address the nation more, and go on the tv talk shows too- He is a likeable person. He has to ask the American people to stand by our troops and our war effort. It's the only way to get through the constant propaganda of the dems.

[timestax]

bttt

[jan in Colorado]

They don't necessarily want their country to lose, but they are not so sure if and they DON'T want it to win either. {There...fixed it!}

The ENEMEDIA and the Democrats are doing everything in their power to help the terrorists win! Their treasonous behavior towards our President and our troops is unforgivable!

[timestax]

bump to the top

[Cobra64]

I agree. President Bush is a TERRIBLE communicator. He mumbles and stutters constantly. I will say that he is very good at impromptu discussions with our military. Thank God for that. Too bad he does not have the stones in getting tough with the terrorists... MOABs, nukes....