Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Charles to visit hurricane-hit New Orleans
Prince Charles to visit hurricane-hit New Orleans ^ | Monday, October 31, 2005

Posted on 10/31/2005 1:11:44 PM PST by caryatid

LONDON -- Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall, will visit hurricane-hit New Orleans on their first official overseas jaunt since marrying in April, the prince's office confirmed Monday.

Charles' Clarence House office would not reveal the exact timing or itinerary for the flying visit, although the couple are expected to meet emergency workers and residents in an area ravaged by Hurricane Katrina.

The 56-year-old heir to the throne, his wife and a wardrobe full of dresses jet off Tuesday on a tour designed to celebrate trans-Atlantic ties, promote Charles' environmentalist causes -- and test reaction to his new bride in a nation still smitten with the late Princess Diana.

"This is Diana country," said Lisa Stewart, a member of a band of devotees called the Diana Circle U.S. "We love Diana still."

Charles and Camillla, Duchess of Cornwall, begin the week-long tour on Tuesday in New York. They also will visit San Francisco and Washington, where they will dine at the White House with President George W. Bush and his wife Laura.

In Manhattan, the royal couple will unveil a memorial to victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.

Visits to farms, markets, schools and museums will give Charles a chance to highlight issues close to his heart -- organic food production, the environment, education and classical architecture.

Aides hope the prince's first official tour of the United States since 1994 won't be eclipsed by memories of a visit in 1985 -- when a radiant Diana danced with John Travolta at a White House dinner.

"For a long time the (British) media has regarded the States as Diana territory," said Joe Little, managing editor of Majesty magazine. "But there's nothing to suggest Camilla won't get a warm welcome."

The prince's office says the trip is intended to recognize "the importance of the relationship between the two countries and their common bonds and shared traditions."

It is also part of a careful palace plan to win acceptance for the duchess, long reviled in the British press -- and among Diana-philes -- as the woman who broke up the royal romance. "There were three of us in that marriage," Diana told a television reporter in 1995.

Charles and Diana divorced in 1996; Diana was killed in a car crash in Paris the following year.

Since then, a careful series of joint milestones has helped soften public attitudes toward the prince and Camilla, whose relationship began more than 30 years ago, before either was married.

The couple's first public appearance together was in 1999; the first public kiss in 2001. In April they married in a civil ceremony. A poll at the time suggested almost two-thirds of Britons supported the marriage.

In deference to Diana, Camilla did not take the title Princess of Wales, and she has made it clear she wishes to be known as Princess Consort, not queen, when Charles takes the throne -- although experts say she will, officially, be queen.

The 58-year-old duchess has discarded a sometimes frumpy country style for designer dresses and extravagant hats since stepping into the limelight. British newspaper reports said that she was taking 50 dresses on the tour and that 40 staff would accompany the couple. But Charles' office said the true size of the entourage was 16, and stressed the duchess' clothes were paid for from his private income. Officials would not say how many dresses Camilla was taking.

The tour begins Tuesday with a visit to the World Trade Center site in New York, where the couple will dedicate a memorial garden to British victims of the Sept. 11 attacks. There is also a meeting with U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan and a reception.

In Washington, the couple will have lunch and dinner with the Bushes at the White House.

Charles' office would not say whether the prince planned to raise the issue of climate change, which he recently called "the greatest challenge to face man." Bush's refusal to sign the Kyoto accord on greenhouse gas emissions has angered many environmentalists.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: camilla; camzilla; duchessofcornwall; katrina; la; louisiana; neworleans; nola; princecharles; princeofwales; royals; royalvisit

1 posted on 10/31/2005 1:11:46 PM PST by caryatid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LA Woman3; HoHoeHeaux

* ping *


2 posted on 10/31/2005 1:12:28 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

What the hell does that fop and his consort expect to do in NO?


3 posted on 10/31/2005 1:13:03 PM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Haven't they suffered enough?


4 posted on 10/31/2005 1:13:14 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

The residents should play that song "Battle of New Orleans" when they arrive.


5 posted on 10/31/2005 1:17:03 PM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Send him to Pakistan to visit earthquake victims.

And leave him there.


6 posted on 10/31/2005 1:17:25 PM PST by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
What the hell does that fop and his consort expect to do in NO?

Look for a Heineken?

7 posted on 10/31/2005 1:18:05 PM PST by Michael Goldsberry (an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Prince Charles and Camilla
~
Or, the people of New Orleans ... ?

8 posted on 10/31/2005 1:18:20 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Hasn't New Orleans been punished enough without this??


9 posted on 10/31/2005 1:19:16 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

You forgot the eye rolling alert.


10 posted on 10/31/2005 1:19:46 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
What the hell does that fop and his consort expect to do in NO?

I was about to call him a fop as well. I suppose he will effetely pose on the wreckage and blame global warming and American oppression of Islamists. Of course his jet-setting entourage couldn't be contributing any "greenhouse gasses" could they?

We already whupped your predecessors in New Orleans once, Prince. Don't make Gen. Honore go all Andy Jackson on ya.

11 posted on 10/31/2005 1:19:58 PM PST by inkling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom

Sorry, still a newbie ... just mastered posting images ... LOL


12 posted on 10/31/2005 1:20:53 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
"The 56-year-old heir to the throne, his wife and a wardrobe full of dresses jet off Tuesday..."

Prince Charles should avoid appearing in the same sentence as "dresses."

13 posted on 10/31/2005 1:21:12 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

Come on, be nice. I have met him a few times. He is a nice guy with some misguided notions and values.

But what do you expect after a full life of everything at your fingertips, all the money in the world and your only roll in life is to wait for your mother to die.


14 posted on 10/31/2005 1:23:01 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
The people of New Orleans.

Thank you for the opportunity to clarify that. ;-)

15 posted on 10/31/2005 1:28:28 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Please; nobody throw this woman beads ....


16 posted on 10/31/2005 1:33:24 PM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

This can only be driven by sick, morbid curiosity. They should not be allowed in. What a couple of warped pinheads.


17 posted on 10/31/2005 1:36:26 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

I agree. Why don't they just pose for a few pictures in Washington and go back home?


18 posted on 10/31/2005 1:39:04 PM PST by tippytoes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

The people of New Orleans suffering ...

19 posted on 10/31/2005 1:39:22 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Some of us are ignorant when it comes to the lingo (or maybe I'm the only one) so please define "fop". Should we assume the traditional meaning (persnickety, prissy, metrosexual type) or is it an acronym?


20 posted on 10/31/2005 1:43:17 PM PST by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
Hope he brings his Banjo, him and Nagin can recreate that scene from Deliverance (No not the squeal like a pig one)
21 posted on 10/31/2005 1:47:50 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonF

Beads courtesy of emardigrasbeads.com

22 posted on 10/31/2005 1:50:59 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
"This is Diana country," said Lisa Stewart, a member of a band of devotees called the Diana Circle U.S. "We love Diana still."

Wow. Someone stupider than the Prince of Wales.

23 posted on 10/31/2005 1:54:40 PM PST by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Over five years real military service -- including helicopter pilot, fighter jet pilot, and Captain of a mine sweeper.

Plays extreme sports for recreation: polo (one of the world's most dangerous sports), alpine skiing, riding the hounds, shooting, etc., etc.

Dedicates himself to serious causes, when he could simply live the life of an international playboy. Disagree with him you may -- he's wrong on a lot of issues -- but, give him credit for diligence.

Fop -- or just another victim of the media?





24 posted on 10/31/2005 2:00:00 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
Oh how noble of them to condescend to such charity as
bestowing a visit upon the dregs of America....

Blue blood = O2 deprivation

25 posted on 10/31/2005 2:16:02 PM PST by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Lisa Stewart, 35, of Louisiana, founder of the Diana Circle U.S., said "Diana will never die".

Do you think people have too much time and money on ther hands ... ? LOL

26 posted on 10/31/2005 2:19:32 PM PST by caryatid (Stand still and look until you really see ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

What's Barmy Prince Charlie going to do -- put tampons in the dikes to stop the leaking?


27 posted on 10/31/2005 2:21:35 PM PST by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA; cardinal4

Although I spent five years in England, I'm not much of a Royal Watcher. But I think the Prince to whom you refer is Andrew, who was indeed a Naval Officer and flew a helicopter during the Falklands Campaign.


28 posted on 10/31/2005 2:42:58 PM PST by Ax (March or Die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: billorites

Charles will never be the King of England


29 posted on 10/31/2005 2:45:19 PM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: expatguy

TEll the tampon and the tampon holder to go back to england.


30 posted on 10/31/2005 2:48:52 PM PST by tessalu (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

Chuck,
Do not forget your harlot when you leave. She would wind up working one of the live shows.


31 posted on 10/31/2005 2:51:14 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (Proud to be named as a member of the Radical Right Wing. Vast Right Wing got old.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
Come on, be nice. I have met him a few times. He is a nice guy with some misguided notions and values.

I've alway given him a break and often thought he was being treated poorly.

Unfortunately, on this trip to the US all I've heard so far is that he disagrees with everything American.

He could surprise me on his trip to New Orleans, but I'd bet that he won't be complementary.

32 posted on 10/31/2005 2:56:26 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
please define "fop".

I found this at: http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2000/01/24.html

Word of the Day for Monday January 24, 2000 fop \FOP\, noun: A man who is much concerned with his dress and appearance; a dandy.
---------------------------
Fop comes from Middle English fop, foppe, a fool.

33 posted on 10/31/2005 3:01:09 PM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

oh how bloody nice of them,bless their royal undies--Is this after they tell us how we must treat the poor old muslims of the world??another "pet" project of the dopey royals..treat them like dianna did--F-um


34 posted on 10/31/2005 3:04:00 PM PST by rang1995 (They will love us when we win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

why?


35 posted on 10/31/2005 3:04:31 PM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Clinton is a "nice guy", too, according to some.

Doesn't mean I want him living next door to me or visiting my city after a disaster.


36 posted on 10/31/2005 3:11:19 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: caryatid
Charles' office would not say whether the prince planned to raise the issue of climate change, which he recently called "the greatest challenge to face man." Bush's refusal to sign the Kyoto accord on greenhouse gas emissions has angered many environmentalists.

Guess this is the real reason for the New Orleans visit... Global warming caused Katrina.
37 posted on 10/31/2005 3:23:11 PM PST by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ax
You're right about Andrew -- but, Charles also had a military career (although he didn't see combat).

http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/about/bio_flying.htm

An historian I once heard said that it is important to remember that the British once ruled half the world & they didn't get there by being pansies. He said we shouldn't let the veneer of manners fool us about the character beneath. Historically, the aristocracy were all warriors -- the Royals were the meanest of the mean.

While things have changed a lot since then, many of those warrior values remain in the Royals. Diana tried to redefine the Monarchy as a sort of Paris Hilton celebrity role. The media loved it; but the rest of the Royal family hated it -- especially when she went on her whine-fest on daytime tv.
38 posted on 10/31/2005 3:43:26 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: caryatid

"I say, my Homey, do you have some Grey Poupon old chap?"


39 posted on 10/31/2005 4:10:13 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

The Prince of Wales appears like a "blue" version of George McGovern or John F. Kerry.


40 posted on 11/01/2005 4:39:30 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Alberta independentists to Canada (read: Ontario and Quebec): One hundred years is long enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK
It's not easy defending someone born to such wealth and privilege. However, I've long thought that Prince Charles has gotten the same sort of press treatment as, for instance, GWB. We simply don't know the man.

When he was married to Diana, he suffered by comparison; because she was the quintessential fairytale princess and the media loved her (whether she was playing the role of slut or saint). Diana was a Paris Hilton style bimbo; while she was probably quite intelligent, she never really showed it. In her saint role, she did various charitable works, including visiting AIDS patients -- laudable enough, but nothing that any Hollywood airhead couldn't also do. The one serious, controversial political cause she got involved in was the prohibition of land mines. The U.S. didn't ratify that agreement; because it would have cost too many servicemen their lives. It was an emotion-driven policy that was too extreme for even the Clinton administration.


By comparison, Charles has been involved in several substantive issues over the years. Most Freepers would disagree with his positions on most of them -- but he was no dilettante. He strives to live up to the role he was born into.

Unlike Kerry; Charles was, and is an extremely wealthy man in his own right -- he didn't have to play the gigolo to get the money. Unlike other rich, powerful men; he ditched the trophy wife, to marry the older, plain looking (I'm being kind) woman he always loved.

Unlike McGovern; when Charles dons military garb, and sits in military hardware; he's earned that right. He did 5 years of military service -- which included parachute training, helicopter pilot, and fighter jet pilot. While he never saw combat, his training and service was real, and there were real dangers involved. His service was at least on par with that of GWB (and I believe that GWB served honourably).
41 posted on 11/01/2005 5:45:58 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
His service was at least on par with that of GWB (and I believe that GWB served honourably).

I know His Royal Highness slightly - he briefly attended the same school as me in the mid 1960s and when I went into the Royal Australian Navy, he was serving in the Royal Navy and through a mutual friend we made contact.

His service was fairly brief, and certainly nothing spectacular. But it was genuine Naval service. He did his duty and he has done his duty to his country and to the Commonwealth all of his life in many different ways.

Those who call him a fop - well, I was in Sydney in 1994 when a man ran at him firing a starting pistol - and none of us knew that it was a starting pistol. He heard the shots. He must have known that there was a good chance his life was under threat. And he calmly, bravely, stood his ground, without flinching until his bodyguard shouldered him aside. I've seen a lot of courageous acts in my life - and that matched any of them.

I've looked for images online, and only found a couple of small ones.

Incidentally - in that last picture, two of the three men trying to grab the assailant are the Premier of New South Wales and the Australian of the Year. Prince Charles' police bodyguard can be seen pushing the Prince back, having previously put himself between the Prince and the assailant, but besides that, there hasn't been much movement from security. And, rather embarassingly, you can see a number of military and senior police officers still seated.

This man is no fop. But he has to live a certain life. Duty demands it of him.

His politics are, at times, lamentable certainly. But his dedication to his nation and his duty as he sees it are not.

42 posted on 11/03/2005 8:00:45 PM PST by naturalman1975 (Sure, give peace a chance - but si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson