Her Comment to Taubmen denying a leak As Rush says, didnb't fit the story template. They didn't leak, They apparently repeated hearsay. Miller told the truth and that truth was not acceptable to advance the story.
Miller isn't the only one who mislead people (or outright lied)...
July 15, 2005, 8:27 a.m.
Who Exposed Secret Agent Plame?
How about the least likely suspect?
snip
So if Novak did not reveal that Valerie Plame was a secret agent, who did? The evidence strongly suggests it was none other than Joe Wilson himself.
snip
The first reference to Plame being a secret agent appears in The Nation, in an article by David Corn published July 16, 2003, just two days after Novaks column appeared. It carried this lead: Did Bush officials blow the cover of a U.S. intelligence officer working covertly in a field of vital importance to national security and break the law in order to strike at a Bush administration critic and intimidate others?
Since Novak did not report that Plame was working covertly how did Corn know thats what she had been doing?
Corn does not tell his readers and he has responded to a query from me only by pointing out that he was asking a question, not making a statement of fact. But in the article, he asserts that Novak outed Plame as an undercover CIA officer. Again, Novak did not do that. Rather, it is Corn who is, apparently for the first time, outing Plames undercover status.
Corn follows that assertion with a quote from Wilson saying, I will not answer questions about my wife. Any reporter worth his salt would immediately wonder: Did Wilson indeed answer Corns questions about his wife after Corn agreed not to quote his answers but to use them only on background? Read the rest of Corns piece and its difficult to believe anything else. Corn names no other sources for the information he provides and he provides much more information than Novak revealed.
Corn also claims that Wilson will not confirm nor deny that his wife
works for the CIA. Corn adds: But lets assume she does. That would seem to mean that the Bush administration has screwed one of its own top-secret operatives in order to punish Wilson
On what basis could Corn assume that Plame was not only working covertly but was actually a top-secret operative? And where did Corn get the idea that Plame had been outed in order to punish Wilson? That is not suggested by anything in the Novak column which, as I noted, is sympathetic to Wilson and Plame.
The likely answer: The allegation that someone in the administration leaked to Novak as a way to punish Wilson was made by Wilson to Corn. But Corn, rather than quote Wilson, puts the idea forward as his own.
Keep in mind that from early on there were two possible but contradictory scenarios:
1) Members of the Bush administration intentionally exposed a covert CIA agent as a way to take revenge against her husband who had written a critical op-ed.
2) Members of the Bush administration were attempting to set the record straight by telling reporters that it was not Vice President Cheney who sent Wilson on the Africa assignment as Wilson claimed; rather Wilsons wife, a CIA employee, helped get him the assignment. (And that is indeed the conclusion of the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee.)
Corns article then goes on to provide specific details about Plames undercover work, her dicey and difficult mission of tracking parties trying to buy or sell weapons of mass destruction or WMD material. But how does Corn know about that? From what source could he have learned it?
Corn concludes that Plames career has been destroyed by the Bush administration. And here he does, finally, quote Wilson directly. Wilson says: Naming her this way would have compromised every operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated in her entire career. This is the stuff of Kim Philby and Aldrich Ames.
Corn has assured us several times that Wilson refused to answer questions about his wife, refused to confirm or deny that she worked for the CIA, refused to acknowledge whether she is a deep-cover CIA employee. But he is willing to say on the record that naming her this way was an act of treachery? Thats not talking about his wife? Thats not providing confirmation? There is only one way to interpret this: Wilson did indeed talk about his wife, her work as a secret agent, and other matters to Corn (and perhaps others?) on a confidential basis.
If Wilson did tell Corn that his wife was an undercover agent, did he commit a crime? I dont claim to know. But the charge that someone committed a crime by naming Plame as a covert agent was also made by Corn, apparently for the first time, in this same article. No doubt, the independent prosecutor and the grand jury will sort it out.
Criminality aside, if Wilson revealed to Corn that Plame worked as a CIA deep-cover operative tracking parties trying to buy or sell WMDs, surely thats news.
snip
But once Corn published the fact that Plame had been a top-secret operative, and once he quoted Wilson saying what exposing his wife would mean and once Plame posed for Vanity Fair photographers anyone who had ever known her in a different context and with a different identity would have been tipped off.
But they would not have been tipped by Novak nor, based on what we know so far, by Karl Rove. Rather, it appears they would have been tipped off by Joe Wilson who, the publicly available evidence strongly suggests, leaked like a sieve to The Nations David Corn.
Clifford May
http://tinyurl.com/dtafu