Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Betaille
"Because he wants a well-qualified conservative nominee for the Supreme Court?"

What does "well-qualified" mean in Republican Land, anyway? After all, Republicans, generally speaking, have voted for the confirmation of plenty of "well-qualifed" "interpreters" of the Constitution.

They voted, generally speaking, for the confirmation of Ginsberg, didn't they? Yet no one questioned whether or not a postmodern ACLU lawyer was "qualified" to opine about the law. Nope. But they sure are now.

9 posted on 10/06/2005 2:47:16 PM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Reactionary
They voted, generally speaking, for the confirmation of Ginsberg, didn't they?

Exactly. The truth of it is, when it comes to judges, the GOP are STILL getting their asses kicked by the Dems. I wish to Heaven I had someone like Schumer on my side instead of morons like Hatch and Frist. Bunch of pussies. Why did they vote for Ginsburg and breyer anyway? Because they are suckers.

12 posted on 10/06/2005 2:55:31 PM PDT by Huck ("Sometimes you're better off not knowing how much you've been had." --Bob Dylan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson