Posted on 10/06/2005 7:58:01 AM PDT by manny613
"I do know that it's true," said former secretary of education and drug czar William Bennett, "that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could if that were your sole purpose you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky."
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
Why keep bringing this up again and again?
Time to drop it already.
Take note of those borking Bennett and you will find cowards, uninformed arses, or a lying liberal lefty borker
Can we agree that it's not what Bill Bennett said that got him into trouble, but the way he said it? I don't think there is a racist bone in his body, but the media and 'Rats are still trying to get a lot of mileage out of this story. I'm sick of hearing about it. What else is he to do? Apologize?
I am very suspicious of Bill Bennett. His brother, whom Bill has defended in the past, is evil and is currently spreading lies related to the Judith Millar affair.
Larry nailed it.
What lies?
Is this for your ping list?
We already know the libs are looking for any opportunity to attack -- why give them the opportunity?
Black conservative ping
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
and if white babies were aborted, the cocaine rate would go down.
There's not a thing Bill Bennett said that isn't true.
"why give them the opportunity (to attack)?" One good reason -- I refuse to edit my words so that I don't get attacked. That's dangerously close to walking on eggshells, in my opinion. And giving them the power to control our words.
I liked this column; Bill Bennett is a Godly man. Was it brash? Yes. Are the dems out for blood? YES. It is perhaps an honor to be attacked by them, for you are perceived to be a strong threat.
And like Ann Coulter pointed out last night the Left Really does have that philosophy
"why give them the opportunity (to attack)?" One good reason -- I refuse to edit my words so that I don't get attacked. That's dangerously close to walking on eggshells, in my opinion. And giving them the power to control our words.
I liked this column; Bill Bennett is a Godly man. Was it brash? Yes. Are the dems out for blood? YES. It is perhaps an honor to be attacked by them, for you are perceived to be a strong threat.
I'll go along with that, just so long as we all hang together.
By sheer mathematics, he is correct. His error was specifying race.
If he does anything, he can apologize for using the race specific term "black". That apology would be adequate and parallel to the faux-apologies we hear from the stumble-tongued liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.