Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fair Tax - Straightening Out Some Confusion
Nealz Nuze ^ | 9/15/2005 | Neal Boortz

Posted on 09/15/2005 7:03:21 AM PDT by groanup

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-439 next last
To: pigdog
You'll get no argument from any of the FairTax supporters I know about spending being too high - but that can't be seriously worked on until the tax system is under control.

Say what????

381 posted on 09/19/2005 5:22:14 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Nope all 5 have been completely refuted. The fact you continue to call anyone who doesn't agree with you a liar and dishonest says more about you than anyone else.


382 posted on 09/19/2005 5:30:20 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Nope all 5 have been completely refuted.

Riiiiight. That is why Boortz backed off his claims after Money Magazine refuted the fairtax claim.

383 posted on 09/19/2005 5:32:27 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Can't speak for what Boortz did or didn't do. but the magazine writer refuted nothing at all. He merely was making the same CLAIM that RobFromGa was making. That's a claim - not a refutal.

And there is little solid basis for the claim.


384 posted on 09/19/2005 5:47:00 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: djndanger

If you don't ELIMINATE the 16th Amendment, you still have the very real possibility of an income tax. FairTax doesn't address this at all.


385 posted on 09/19/2005 5:47:14 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1

You don't know the power of the dark side (aka government).


386 posted on 09/19/2005 5:48:57 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: pigdog

Thank you for pointing out that link.


387 posted on 09/19/2005 5:50:17 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Goddess
The FairTax is not perfect, but it's the best of all the proposals I've seen thus far, and I've been watching the Fundamental Tax reform movement for over a decade now. If you have a better system, I'd really like to hear about it.

A Dick Armey-style flat tax would be much better. If we can't *reform* the current system, then a complete overhaul is, in my opinion, a non-starter.

Remember, ANY tax system, with Congress in session, can and will be amended, even a purely-passed 'fair tax'. Also remember, your fair tax has yet to be edited in a tax committee. There is a reason Bismarck compared writing legislation with making sausages!!

388 posted on 09/19/2005 5:55:08 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: phil_will1
I think you should research RFID, surveillance cameras, and relational databases, etc.

Your fair tax has yet to edited in a tax committee. You guys are dreaming if you think that your law will remain pure.

389 posted on 09/19/2005 5:58:16 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: CSM
"I take it then that you want two slaughter houses imposed on us??"

What prevents the House and Senate from imposing the 2nd slaughter house today?

Nothing at all. Which is why I am commenting on this topic.

390 posted on 09/19/2005 6:01:19 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide
"By the way how are flea markets treated? There are new items and there are used items."

I've seen vendors at flea markets. They are not likely to collect and remit sales tax at all.

Another Loophole?!?!

If you are the seller, and I am the buyer (or vice versa) let's just split the difference and call it a day!

391 posted on 09/19/2005 6:02:53 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
"By the way I have some exemption ideas myself, and maybe you do too!!"

Oddly, the current bill already has ONE exemption for college tuition, which opens up the floodgate. Why not health expenses too?

By golly, how many loopholes can we come up with together? Worse, how many loopholes can 535 members of Congress?

392 posted on 09/19/2005 6:05:35 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Dan Walsh
Wrong. The IRS will compare the businesses wholesale purchases against sales. They will not contact individual consumers!

Come to my flea market!

393 posted on 09/19/2005 6:06:26 PM PDT by hripka (There are a lot of smart people out there in FReeperLand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: hripka

Not really. The FairTax repeals the income tax, eliminates (and defunds) the IRS, requires all income tax records to be destroyed and calls for the repeal of the 16th amendment.

Bring the income tax back a few years down the path would be more than unlikely. If there are enough votes to pass the FairTax and repeal the 16th then the I. T. is gone for our lifetimes.

At present thee is nothing to prevent congress from from voting both upon us at the same time. The FairTax prevents that - read the bill.


394 posted on 09/19/2005 6:07:33 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Can't speak for what Boortz did or didn't do. but the magazine writer refuted nothing at all. He merely was making the same CLAIM that RobFromGa was making.

As I said, you have zero intellectual honesty. No matter how thoroughly something is proven, you just close your ears and kick and scream and deny. It is so worthless to debate someone like that.

395 posted on 09/19/2005 6:13:29 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: hripka

That's not an exemption, however. College tuition was not taxed from the inception of the bill as it is presumed to be an investment in human capital.

Think of all the exemptions you like - but the tough part is getting them inserted into the language of the bill. This bill has huge grassroots support.

OTOH, the Armer/Forbes flat tax has little graassroots support and Forbes himself has said it is not revenue neutral. All of the flat tax plans also retain the payroll taxes, do not tax the illegal economy to any great degree, and have no provision to allow border-adjustability of taxes to help our exporters be more competitive in other countries.


396 posted on 09/19/2005 6:13:48 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
That's not an exemption, however. College tuition was not taxed from the inception of the bill as it is presumed to be an investment in human capital.

Why isn't food 'an investment in human capital'? Or health care? Or housing? What pointie headed socialist decided that college tuition was the one thing that qualifies as 'investment in human capitol'?

397 posted on 09/19/2005 6:25:08 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Nothing from the magazine article or Robbie was "proven" at all. Those were just their own opinions of what they though the situation might be. Go ahead and "prove" it if you think you can. And don't just give out the repetitive stuff from those two sources. Come up with some new more definitive material.

BTW ... stop the personal insults.


398 posted on 09/19/2005 6:26:40 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

Education is not consumed as the other things you mention, but builds a base for most people, presumably, to build upon and improve their standing on the economic ladder.

Seems to me there is far more justification for that not being taxed that for things that are clearly consumed.


399 posted on 09/19/2005 6:30:00 PM PDT by pigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: pigdog
Nothing from the magazine article or Robbie was "proven" at all. Those were just their own opinions of what they though the situation might be. Go ahead and "prove" it if you think you can. And don't just give out the repetitive stuff from those two sources. Come up with some new more definitive material.

What more definitive source do you want???? They contacted your expert who fairtaxers paid to do their research???? There is no more definitive material than that.

BTW ... stop the personal insults.

Stop it, you are killing me. However, I will stop until you start. I'll give it a day, two days tops.

400 posted on 09/19/2005 6:30:50 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-439 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson