Posted on 09/11/2005 10:15:00 PM PDT by kingu
I think this is part of the "Endgame" situation that seems to exist now in Northern Ireland. These are the actions of marginalised extremists. They are present on both sides of what is/was the divide. Belfast is a great city again, with much being contributed by all sides to its new found prosperity. I’m sure the people of Northern Ireland will not allow this to become their daily way of life again.
Well, so long as you disregard the single largest atrocity of the troubles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_and_Monaghan_Bombings
Although you are right about who was responsible for the most deaths:
"The bare facts are that of the 3, 285 deaths in the conflict from July 1969 to December 1993, Republicans have killed 1,928, Loyalists 911, British forces 357, Irish Republic forces have killed 3 and "others" [deaths impossible to link to a military group] 86. Of these, 3,059 occurred in N. Ireland, 91 in the South, 118 in Britain and 17 in continental Europe."
From http://www.inac.org/irishhistory/deaths
If you want to turn the clock back to the 17th century then I suppose its only fair that the Indians get to have America back "if only as partial payment for their genocide policy".
I'm sure we would be more than happy to accomodate the Ammirican Irish community, whether in Dover or on the Shankill Road.
Just like the good old days.
No, thank you for pointing out how ignorant you are! You don't understand sarcasm? What an idjit! I usually get jumped on for mispelled words, like "idgit", from the FR police.
Unfortunately it would appear that most people in the Republic don't want the 6 Counties.
Would you after last night?
"I'm sure we would be more than happy to accomodate the Ammirican Irish community, whether in Dover or on the Shankill Road."
No thanks. I would not look good in a running suit and soccer is not a good wagering sport.
But the balaclava helmet might be fetching ;)
Many unionist leaders have "abdicated responsibility" for weekend violence, President George Bush's special envoy to Northern Ireland has said.
Mitchell Reiss said leadership was needed but "in the last few days we haven't seen very much of it".
DUP leader Ian Paisley denied prompting riots by saying the parade re-routing "could be the spark which kindles a fire there would be no putting out".
Mr Paisley condemned the violence but said his prediction had come true.
"I was telling the truth, I said I was very very worried," he said on Monday.
"At that time I was in the midst of trying to get a way whereby this would not happen. And it has happened - my words have been proved to be right."
Two nights of violence began on Saturday when a controversial Protestant Orange Order march was re-routed away from the mainly Catholic Springfield Road area of west Belfast.
After a request by unionists on Friday, the Parades Commission reviewed its ruling on the route, but decided not to change it.
In a BBC interview, Mr Reiss said there was "absolutely no excuse" for the trouble.
What you really need is leadership, and unfortunately in the last few days, we haven't seen very much of it
Mitchell Reiss
US special envoy to NI
"I think all of us are pretty disappointed with the abdication of responsibility by many unionist political leaders," he said.
"No political party, and certainly no responsible political leadership, deserves to serve in a government unless it cooperates and supports fully and unconditionally the police, and calls on its supporters to do so.
"It's true for unionism, it's true for all political parties, and I think that this was not the finest moment for politics in Northern Ireland over the weekend."
The US Envoy said problems needed to be tackled by sustained hard work in communities.
"What you really need is leadership, and unfortunately in the last few days, we haven't seen very much of it," he said.
However, he singled out Ulster Unionist Belfast councillor Fred Cobain for praise for the work he had done over the weekend and in the past weeks.
"When people do stand up and take a courageous stand and exert leadership, they deserve to be recognised," he said.
Absolutely agree. When there are terrorist incidents committed by Muslims we demand that the Muslim community speak out against it, it is equally appropriate for the Orange Order and the Unionist community to condemn and identify those responsible for these terrorist incidents.
My family left the Troubles over 200 years ago.
OK, firstly NI is not a colony of the UK- it is an integral part the country with it's own MPs in Westminster just as Ireland was before it became the Free State. Indeed, it is actually better represented then us poor buggers in England as the province has it's own devolved assembly which is more then we can claim.
"The Indians have their own nations, self governing bodies on the reserved lands of their ancestors."
By the same token, it could be said the Irish have the Republic. Now of course you could argue, as you do, that all Ireland should be Irish, despite the fact that the majority of the population of the North would prefer to remain within the UK- but then in that case would you agree that the Indian tribes should recieve the full lands their ancestors once owned?
At the end of the day, the British government's position since 1949 is that Northern Ireland will remain part of the UK unless this status is rejected by the majority of the population. The last time there was a vote on the issue (1973) it was heavily defeated, partly because of the fact that the nationalists boycotted the vote, something I've always regarded as pointlessly delf-defeating unless they knew they couldn't win. Do you honestly think our government would hold on to Northern Ireland if the vast majority of the population wanted to be part of the Republic, and voted accordingly? Frankly, I imagine many would love to be shot of the place, and many more in Eire proper would be shaking their heads at the poisoned chalice they'd been handed.
Personally, I don't give a toss about the place- if the people of NI want to remain part of the UK then bully for them, and if not then they can join the Republic or go it along or anything else they fancy, as long as they don't come crying to us afterwards.
You have hit the nail on the head. The Irish government is more than happy to let the UK deal with the raving nutters in NI and most people in the Republic don't give a toss about the place either. Both the Irish and British governments, along with most of their constituents, would love to see NI towed out to the middle of the Atlantic and sunk. Good luck convincing the Irish Americans of that though. Why they think that the nutters will suddenly decide to get along with each other if the Tricolour is flying over Belfast City Hall instead of the Union Jack mystifies me.
I'll tell you what, how about this as a compromise- The referrendum on the status of NI should be made by everyone involved- the population of the province, the Irish people, and the British. That way us on the mainland can vote for a united Ireland and lump Eire with the godforsaken place whether they like it or not! ;)
Seriously though, my objection to that idea is that is that many in NI don't consider themselves Irish, per se- they consider themselves British. A referrendum in the Republic as well would in the eyes of many concede the status of the north before the vote even began. I wouldn't be wholly surprised if a vote ever takes place that the population of Eire vote on whether to accept Ulster- and that would be an interesting referrendum.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.