Skip to comments.
US envoy sets out to wreck UN reform deal
News.Telegraph ^
| August 26, 2005
| Francis Harris in Washington
Posted on 08/25/2005 6:59:49 PM PDT by Kaslin
America's controversial new ambassador to the United Nations is threatening to torpedo 12 months of negotiations on the reform of the organisation.
With only three weeks to go before world leaders arrive in New York to agree the deal, ambassador John Bolton has tabled at least 500 amendments.
n a letter to fellow UN ambassadors, Mr Bolton said the 38-page document might have to be ditched altogether and replaced with a far less detailed alternative. The letter, which was leaked yesterday, asks other ambassadors to remain "open to alternative formats if they help us achieve consensus".
Mr Bolton's intervention has greatly raised the stakes in the search for a deal. America is now effectively asking the world whether it wants a new deal, or no deal.
The agreement was negotiated by all UN members states, but its predictably UN tone seems to have angered the no-nonsense Mr Bolton, a former senior state department official.
Large sections would commit Washington to policies with which it profoundly disagrees. America is being asked to promise 0.7 per cent of its national income for foreign aid; acknowledge the role of the International Criminal Court, which it has not joined; and cut extreme poverty and introduce primary education for all children within 10 years.
America wants the UN to back fundamental reform of the organisation's management structure; to agree measures to fight terrorism and to abolish its human rights machinery.
The ambassador's intervention is precisely what his supporters wanted. American conservatives believe the UN is corrupt and unaccountable. Congress is currently examining a Bill that would cut off American funds unless the UN makes major changes.
Nile Gardiner, an analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said: "Bolton is sending a very clear message that the US is not going to go along with [the UN secretary general] Kofi Annan's definition of reform. Bolton is throwing down the gauntlet to the UN establishment."
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: adultsinchargenow; johnbolton; kofisworstnightmare; profileincourage; un; unitednations
1
posted on
08/25/2005 6:59:49 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Reform # 1. Relocate the UN to Brussels.
Reform # 2. Cut off all US aid to the UN.
Reform # 3. Withdraw from UN membership.
2
posted on
08/25/2005 7:02:35 PM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Kaslin
Mr Bolton's intervention has greatly raised the stakes in the search for a deal. America is now effectively asking the world whether it wants a new deal, or no deal....
-----
Go John!! Since the U.S. really picks up the tab, and does all the dirty laundry for the U.N. (eg Iraq) --- it is time this gutless body of thugs stand up and salute, or get out of the way!!!! (and hopefully out of the U.S.)
3
posted on
08/25/2005 7:02:42 PM PDT
by
EagleUSA
(w)
To: Kaslin
He's doing the Presidents work. Good for him. He's doing exactly what needs to be done and the UN thieves aren't going to like it.
4
posted on
08/25/2005 7:03:57 PM PDT
by
Arkie2
(No, we cannot make cheese as stinky as the French.)
To: Kaslin
YEH!! :)
5
posted on
08/25/2005 7:04:55 PM PDT
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: Kaslin
"America is being asked to promise 0.7 per cent of its national income for foreign aid; acknowledge the role of the International Criminal Court, which it has not joined; and cut extreme poverty and introduce primary education for all children within 10 years."
No, no, where and where? Compared to the rest of the world, we don't have extreme poverty and we do have primary education for all children. We will determine foreign aid on our own, thank you, without Kofi, Jacques or anyone else telling us what to spend.
Go get 'em Bolton. This isn't a reform plan, it is putting plaster on a collapsing building.
6
posted on
08/25/2005 7:05:21 PM PDT
by
mak5
To: EagleUSA
Mr.Bush you picked the right man for the job!
To: Kaslin
And if Pr. Bush had waited for the Senate to act...who would be minding the store now at the UN?
8
posted on
08/25/2005 7:06:30 PM PDT
by
Coyoteman
(Is this a good tagline?)
To: Kaslin
Large sections would commit Washington to policies with which it profoundly disagrees. America is being asked to promise 0.7 per cent of its national income for foreign aid; acknowledge the role of the International Criminal Court, which it has not joinedThank G-d there's no "President Kerry."
9
posted on
08/25/2005 7:07:00 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: Kaslin
The corrupt little boys and girls in the U.N. were hoping they could shove their smoke and mirrors version of "reform" through before Bolton came in and called BS on the whole mess. John Bolton is DA MAN!!!!
10
posted on
08/25/2005 7:08:24 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
To: Kaslin
Bolton is throwing down the gauntlet to the UN establishment Based on the wailing, it may be that he is putting it up somewhere. Heh, heh, heh.
11
posted on
08/25/2005 7:08:38 PM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: Kaslin
Large sections would commit Washington to policies with which it profoundly disagrees. America is being asked to promise 0.7 per cent of its national income for foreign aid; acknowledge the role of the International Criminal Court, which it has not joined; and cut extreme poverty and introduce primary education for all children within 10 years. Well, that's an interesting idea of what constitutes UN reform, isn't it? Is there a part in there about UN employees not allowing bloody-handed dictators to line their pockets while he murders people?
Didn't think so.
To: Kaslin
Since diplomacy has never been one of my strengths I must confess I don't know if John Bolton is being diplomatic. But, I don't care. Rip em apart John. Make em squeal like the little girls they are. Make em cry and then laugh at em. Hey, this diplomacy thingee isn't that hard.
13
posted on
08/25/2005 7:12:02 PM PDT
by
crazyhorse691
( Heaven on Earth is where the nearest Starbucks is 60 miles away.)
To: Kaslin
The agreement was negotiated by all UN members states, but its predictably UN tone seems to have angered the no-nonsense Mr Bolton, a former senior state department official.
If all UN member states were in on the negotiations, who was negotiating for us?
14
posted on
08/25/2005 7:15:37 PM PDT
by
Moiraine
To: Kaslin
The right man for the job , no thanks to those Democrat Penisheads in the Senate.
To: Kaslin
The right man for the job!!!! He's there to do right thng for the U.S. and to raise some hell when the job calls for it.
Raise some HELL John!
16
posted on
08/25/2005 7:20:46 PM PDT
by
adorno
To: Kaslin
And who was it who worked so hard to keep this man out of the UN. Joe "I want to be president" Biden with his sidekick puppet, Chris Dodd, IIRC.
17
posted on
08/25/2005 7:22:33 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
(Air America: kids-for-kilowatts)
To: Kaslin
The agreement was negotiated by all UN members states, but its predictably UN tone seems to have angered the no-nonsense Mr Bolton, a former senior state department official. Inquiring minds want to know... What was Ambassador Danforth doing while all of this nonsense was being "negotiated by all UN members states (sic)"? Did all of this mischief happen after Danforth left? (Didn't he leave early this year? Was his leaving related in some way to his not fighting this, or due to other conflicts with Bush administration policies? And, what did Anne W. Patterson, acting US Ambassador to the UN do about this in the interim?)
18
posted on
08/25/2005 7:24:58 PM PDT
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: sgtbono2002
I think that the technical term is "Putzheads"... (thanks, Senator D'Amato)
19
posted on
08/25/2005 7:26:35 PM PDT
by
The Electrician
("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
To: FlingWingFlyer
The corrupt little boys and girls in the U.N. were hoping they could shove their smoke and mirrors version of "reform" through before Bolton came in and called BS on the whole mess.And the democrats were trying everything to help them
John Bolton is DA MAN!!!!
Indeed he is
20
posted on
08/25/2005 7:32:23 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
ALL those so opposed to the President's selection should be made to apologize to the American people in front of the congress and senate. Liberals wouldn't understand a pickpocket's sudden abrupt concern over your ability to walk,so the cad would walk closer to you and help you along your
way. "Wasn't that nice of him?...hey where's my wallet?"
Doogle
21
posted on
08/25/2005 7:32:59 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(8th AF...4077thTFW....408MMS....Ubon Thailand "69"..Night Line Delivery ..AMMO)
To: Arkie2
He sure is.
Too bad for them
22
posted on
08/25/2005 7:33:34 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
This is how you drive liberals nuts. I love it!
To: Kaslin
John Bolton should plagiarize the BRAC language on NAS Oceana, unilaterally and rigorously imposing the will on the United States upon the UN for eternity...or offer the UN the opportunity to relocate and forgo ANY support from us.
However, instead of offering up a comparable paradise such as NAS Cecil Field as the BRAC did, he should offer up Lagos, or some other hideously overpriced, pestiferous, third world, hell hole.
Brussels is WAAAAAAY to nice a place for the corruption and incompetence of the UN.
In short, when dealing with the UN our motto should be "WHO'S YOUR DADDY?"
To: knighthawk
Lights, camera, action....
25
posted on
08/25/2005 7:39:11 PM PDT
by
lakey
To: Kaslin
WOW---It sounds like Bolton is doing exactly what we and Dubya have been waiting for...
.07 of our money to go to foreign taxes?? I don't think so..
International Court...no way
What children are they talking about getting schooling by 10? Ours in the USA already do...and they are the ones we should care about..
26
posted on
08/25/2005 7:39:41 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
To: Kaslin
With only three weeks to go before world leaders arrive in New York to agree the deal, ambassador John Bolton has tabled at least 500 amendments. Woooo Hooooo!
I am sure that Adlai Stevenson... Patrick Moynahan... Jeanne Kirkpatrick are all smiling and applauding.
The UN is a corrupt, larcenous cess pool; Huge welfare at an international scale.
Business as usual is hardly a pleasant thought.
28
posted on
08/25/2005 7:41:53 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: Bahbah
I betcha though, that the dems will be howling about this..
Congress is back in session in less than 2 weeks, and I can already see Biden and especially Dodd up on the Senate floor the FIRST day, complaining about the "shoddy treatment" that Bolton has been giving the illustrious leaders at the UN!!! LOL
Which will be followed by a resolution that condemns Pat Robertson for his nasty, nasty suggestion of assasinating their friend Hugo baby!
29
posted on
08/25/2005 7:43:31 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
To: Kaslin
Somebody should send this thread to the White House.
30
posted on
08/25/2005 7:44:22 PM PDT
by
dsc
To: Kaslin
To: peyton randolph
Brussels? I was thinking more along the lines of say, Abas Adiba.
You're spot on re: points 2 and 3.
L
32
posted on
08/25/2005 7:45:39 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(1-866-DHS-2ICE.-Toll free and anonymous. Report illegal aliens and those who hire them.)
To: Kaslin
Obviously in all the weeks that Bolton was waiting for confirmation, he was hard at work formating these reforms.
Go, John, go!
33
posted on
08/25/2005 7:47:55 PM PDT
by
mickie
To: Kaslin
34
posted on
08/25/2005 7:50:02 PM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(God Bless President Bush)
To: Lurker
Brussels? I was hoping to bankrupt Belgium...plus have the added fun of watching the EUrocrats compete with the UNechs over turf, perqs, etc.
35
posted on
08/25/2005 7:53:42 PM PDT
by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: Kaslin
Notice the communist spin on the whole story?
"...out to wreck..."
Some things need wrecking!
36
posted on
08/25/2005 7:53:46 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
To: Kaslin
The President and his brain trust, including Bolton, had all the above issues figured out a long time ago. Now the UN ambassador will carry out the wishes of his boss in New York.
Bolton can be trusted by the Prez one hundred per cent. He's the guy who will tenaciously hang in there despite all slings and arrows.....just as tenaciously as his boss executes the War on Terror under similar fire.
What a team!!!!
Leni
To: The Electrician
I was going to use the term Dick, but I didnt want to get barred.
To: Kaslin
39
posted on
08/25/2005 8:01:07 PM PDT
by
AliVeritas
(Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
To: Kaslin
America's controversial new ambassador to the United Nations is threatening to torpedo 12 months of negotiations on the reform of the organisation. What wonderful news!! Go Bolt!!
40
posted on
08/25/2005 8:01:23 PM PDT
by
aquila48
To: Txsleuth
I betcha though, that the dems will be howling about this.. See for yourself. :)
41
posted on
08/25/2005 8:01:32 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, PRO-LIFE..." -- FR founder Jim Robinson)
To: Kaslin
With only three weeks to go before world leaders arrive in New York to agree the deal, ambassador John Bolton has tabled at least 500 amendments. Now we know why the Slave Party wanted delay: They were going to try to get the bulk of this crap shoved through without knowledgeable American opposition.
I hate socialists. What a mendacious, evil, conniving, disaster these thugs are!
42
posted on
08/25/2005 8:09:50 PM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: Kaslin
43
posted on
08/25/2005 8:17:15 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
You know, I can only read those posts over there for so long, and then their "potty mouths" just make me feel nasty...
They are calling for the UN members to ignore Bolton. goody
44
posted on
08/25/2005 8:35:19 PM PDT
by
Txsleuth
To: Kaslin; 359Henrie; jan in Colorado; Dark Skies
Best news I've heard all week!
45
posted on
08/25/2005 8:54:16 PM PDT
by
Fred Nerks
(Understand islam understand evil - read THE LIFE OF MUHAMMAD free pdf see link My Page)
To: Kaslin
I like this guy, but get a hair cut.
To: Kaslin
47
posted on
08/25/2005 9:05:00 PM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; MizSterious; ...
American conservatives believe the UN is corrupt and unaccountable. Congress is currently examining a Bill that would cut off American funds unless the UN makes major changes
No more UN for US-list
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
49
posted on
08/26/2005 9:29:36 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
To: knighthawk
Congress is currently examining a Bill that would cut off American funds unless the UN makes major changes Just how long does it take to examine the Bill? I heard about Congress cutting off funds in regards to the UN for years.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson