Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

EXCLUSIVE FREE REPUBLIC REPORTING

I contacted Dr. Dale Jorgenson, the Harvard economist who did the FairTax models, earlier today. He said that he assumed workers would keep their current after-tax income, NOT their current gross pay.

There is no pay raise with the FairTax plan, as many of us have stated, and been ridiculed for stating.

RobFromGa

1 posted on 08/24/2005 9:40:47 PM PDT by RobFromGa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: RobFromGa

Yeah. Let's keep the Gestapo IRS. That's the way to go.


634 posted on 09/01/2005 1:51:45 PM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Great post. It's good to see someone doing some actual research, instead of reading a media report or post from someone who says they know what they're talking about, and then spouting off. Keep up the great work.


636 posted on 09/01/2005 1:58:57 PM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Someone is smoking something!!! Have you or the good Dr. ever been hired by a company? Net pay is never discussed or agreed to. An offer from a company is at gross whether the amount is an hourly rate or an annual salary. For a company to do what you and the good Dr. suggest would be a breach of contract and a cause for action not to mention the reaction of labor unions. THINK! and get real.


644 posted on 09/01/2005 7:26:10 PM PDT by dewey715
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

Rob, I just looked at you home page. It appears you are attempting to do good working with addiction. I think you should stay with that topic because you are apparently out of your league when discussing taxes.


647 posted on 09/01/2005 7:58:14 PM PDT by dewey715
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

The headline seems rather misleading; hardly an explosion of a myth. Rather it is a disagreement of terms of calculations.

Those who demand honesty should also exhibit it themselves.


651 posted on 09/02/2005 11:27:27 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (Liberalism is an ill fated luxury that we cannot afford at this time; it does not work in a crisis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

.


672 posted on 09/06/2005 6:21:50 AM PDT by Semper911 (Nagin = Mayor Culpa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa

I find it fascinating that economists get so confused over simple things like take home pay. Notwithstanding possible misinterpretations of Dr. Jorgenson's testimony - it is quite clear to me that if you were hired as an employee with a gross $1000/mo salary and are paying $400/mo in withholding taxes once the FairTax act comes into effect that employee would then receive the $1000/mo salary that he contracted for in his employment agreement. The savings to the employer would be the matching Social Security withholdings (7.25% or thereabouts), the enourmous cost savings of dealing with withholding tracking, quarterly tax reporting, complex tax avoidence/differance savings/investment plans, and the resulting pass through savings in costs of upstream materials and services used in the standard operation of his business. Of course the biggest benefits of all would be the end to the terrible erosion of our capitalist free market system and the increase in personal freedom for each individual who no longer has to submit his personal financials to government bureaucrats.


703 posted on 11/02/2005 12:51:44 PM PST by proteusguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RobFromGa
If you go to the link below it will take you to a Google preview book where on page Dale Jorgenson explains the household income variables for his econometric model. Quote: Finally, the income of the household sector is the sum of incomes from the supply of capital and labor services, interest payments from governments and the rest of the world, all net taxes, and transfers from the government. I read "all net taxes" as "take home 100% of your pay." I'll have to email Jorgenson I guess before I accuse anyone of purposefully spreading misinformation. http://books.google.com/books?id=SHZF-VNri5YC&pg=PA56&lpg=PA56&dq=%22House+Committee+on+Ways+and+Means%22+Jorgenson&source=web&ots=n6L27ffnsc&sig=LeVwQtq0x3mnfuqGukbHfU5ynV0#PPA62,M1
709 posted on 01/20/2008 8:27:42 AM PST by dculling (Misinformation in Original Post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson