Posted on 08/11/2005 6:36:42 AM PDT by JRios1968
Clearwater, FL (LifeNews.com) -- Terri Schiavo's estranged husband Michael plans to file a lawsuit against her former caretakers. Michael asked a local court on Tuesday to waive the two year statute of limitations against such a lawsuit. Mark Perenich, Michael's new attorney, who replaces euthanasia advocate George Felos, told the Tampa Bay Tribune newspaper he could not comment on the proposed lawsuit.
Under Florida law, legal action must be taken within two years of the alleged mistreatment unless an extension is granted.
Michael could be hoping to go after Florida Governor Jeb Bush or the Florida legislature, which passed Terri's Law in October 2003 authorizing Bush to ask doctors not to starve Terri to death.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifenews.com ...
Guess he's running out of money from his other fraudulent lawsuit.
No surprise. All you had to do was consider what else Schiavo could do to wring money from his dead wife, and lawsuit immediately came up on the radar screen.
Yep. He's after more cash.
Not to mention the book and movie deals...
How anyone in their right mind could not realize that all this man has been after all this time was money. He never cared about Terri, he wanted her dead so he could get money. And now he wants to sue people for her care even though he wanted her dead and killed her.
Odds are the statutory time limit will not be waived. This depraved suspected killer continues to throw up shenanigans to cast suspicions away from the fact that he is, in all likelihood, Terri's attacker.
It's not about the money............./sarc
I thought it was the Constitutional following Tom Delay that was going to be responsible for higher medical care costs.
Could we say that this man is "grandstanding"? Or an Edwards legacy??
This man just might be in a heap of debt getting the feeding tube pulled.
Couldn't agree more. What a whore this supposed man is!
Ping
Where are all of Schiavo's FR defenders? He had so many... Summer vacations? Can't show their faces?
Noooooooooooo, he's not about the money ................ </sarcasm>
I forgot about the book and movie deals. Good grief.
This is why you have to aggressively pursue these evil leeches. They will not sit quietly. They pursue evil and drag the society down with him. I wonder why he dropped Felos?
I guess ol' Mikey made more "promises".
There was a minority (like me) that and thought this mess had gone on too long, with people on both sides exploiting her for their own agenda, but I don’t remember a single “defender” of Michael Schiavo or a single nice word said about him.
They all must of had a little too much wild turkey :^)
Wondered when this POS was going to rear his ugly head again. Always figured he wasn't finished. He didn't dump Felos, Felos just couldn't get any more money out of him. Also Mikey isn't the center of attention anymore---already had his fifteen minutes of fame and it's eating him up. Stay tuned, this monster will eventually self destruct.
LMAO!
One could even say they are "plucked again"
I'm still trying to figure out who the dancing widower plans to sue.
Well if you figure out who mullet man is suing, let me know. I'm still trying to figure that one out.
Do you suppose Felos refused the case because the outcome wouldn't insure starving an innocent person to death to satisfy what appears to be his fascination with death by design?
I have no doubt he feels confident in bringing another lawsuit...this sludge pile keeps winning. Let's hope this time he gets a judge with conscience who will wipe the floor with him.
I suspect Felos dropped him. Felos was all about getting into the limelight and furthering the euthanasia movement in the US.
He has already gotten his piece of the Terri cake.
It's ironic that those who hate Michael Schiavo the most will end up making him a very wealthy man.
I would love to see the malpractice insurers and physicians who had to pay out years ago countersue for the faulty decision. Is it too late for that?
Felos is a euthanasia lawyer. Schiavo needs a malpractice lawyer now. First she had to die, now he needs to go after the money.
Un-freakin'-believable! Just when I didn't think this sleazy, rotten piece of excrement could do anything more despicable! BTW -- has he married the mother of his two children yet?
Right...the first of many lawsuits I expect he will file. This paticular type of lawsuit(medical mal) has a two year filing limit. Other types of lawsuits, such as libel, have a 4 year filing deadline. Gotta have those ducks lined up in proper sequence ya know..
Libel is very hard to prove, and methinks no jury will side with this man, who is clearly trying to profit from the death of his wife, and not for the first time.
So nice of you though to volunteer to be the one Freeper willing to defend this cad now. :)
your right, the man cannot keep quiet. he will have to go through life defending his murder. someday it will slip on what really happened to Terri when she was "found" unconscious.
your right, the man cannot keep quiet. he will have to go through life defending his murder. someday it will slip on what really happened to Terri when she was "found" unconscious.
LMAO, too, xs!
Better starve her to death on hearsay.
There is a God, and He will make sure it happens.
Sounds just like the mantra of one weird science religion I know.
Kill the unwanted legally then sue the opponents...
Where does one sign up for such a gravy train?
My fondest hope is that his little consort will get out of line, his kids will become teens with all that implies, and then we'll see the fur fly. Just a guess, but don't think his "latest" will put up with a control freak.
Any one know if he's ever bothered to marry and legitimize his children?
Ping to more unbelievable crap.
Bump!
Since there has been no recent shortage of people calling the miscreant on his behavior, he wouldn't need an extension of the statute of limitation to pursue libel. He wouldn't pursue any court action that would require him to take the stand and have his honesty challenged.
This is the same man who was kept from any interview except "softball" Larry King. And when he even screwed up on Larry King, he was kept from ALL public exposure. Here's two extracts from his Larry King interviews. In the first (2003) he refused to take a polygraph. In the second (2005) he slipped with "We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want..."
CALLER: Hi Larry. I have a question for Michael... why doesn't he just take a lie detector test?
FELOS: The ultimate lie detector has gone before 20 judges who found Mr. Schiavo to be a loving, caring husband.
KING: (UNINTELLIGIBLE) you could voluntarily take one, right?
FELOS: Sure.
KING: Would you take one?
SCHIAVO: I'll refrain from that right now.
KING: OK. This ain't a court.
SCHIAVO: It's not a court.
Source: HERE
KING: Do you understand how they feel?
M. SCHIAVO: Yes, I do. But this is not about them, it's about Terri. And I've also said that in court. We didn't know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want...
Source: HERE
To equally flippant, I’ve had things more alive in my salad than her. But many on both sides wanted to drag her death 10 years ago out for their own agendas.
Until you can prove that was so, I'll continue to believe we should have erred on the side of life. In any case, depriving anyone of food or water, regardless, is evil.
It was proven to the satisfaction of most. I don’t trust the agenda of those claiming that keeping such a near vegetable breathing for “just” 10 years is evil any more than I trust the motives of another that she be let to die at all cost.
I agree with you that both sides have an agenda..the part I don't agree with is that anything was proven to the satisfaction of anyone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.