Posted on 08/09/2005 3:52:30 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
ping
Have you read Rep. Curt Weldon's book? ...very interesting.
Explaining, yea right. When do the organized crime mob or anytone connected with Clinton have to explain anything? My hope was that when the commission was meeting we had some GOP with enough guts to call them out but that was not to be. For god's sake we can't even get a harsh word from any Republican about Berger. The whole thing makes me sick.
Start the chant!
In another article, the Co-Chairs of the 9/11 Commission already ADMITTED they heard this information but left it out of the final report.
Have to protect that Clinton legacy, you know.
Come on, give me a break!!! Any American with half a brain knows that Bill and Hillary Clinton and their Democrat vermin sat by and let 911 occur. The truth will filter out about this traitor scum that allowed the murder of innocent Americans and others. I know it is hard to believe, but Americans by the millions will vote for these Democrat low life, and usher in their own deaths by their own hands!!! Go figure!!!
That now the 9/11 Commission is asking for an investigation to who it was on the staff that hide this information
He also brought up Gorelick's memo that put up a wall about sharing information
Weldon clearly states that this all happened during the Clinton Administration
Also mentioned that the NYT will be running another front page story tomorrow
Ping to my #27 post
Maybe that's what was in Sandy's pants?
FYI.
Also mentioned that the NYT will be running another front page story tomorrow
Blaming Clinton I hope?
I haven't read the book .. just articles about it ... and they were nothing like what he's been talking about on our local radio station
I doubt it
I haven't read today's article in the NYT .. just previous articles about Weldon's book
And they are nothing like what Weldon has been saying on the radio
Weldon clearly stated that most of this all happened under Clinton's watch and how the intell agencies didn't/couldn't share info because of the wall
I hope this gets legs. I'm bet Sept. 11th was planned alot longer than a year.
I wouldn't be surprised at all if this is what Sandy was hiding down his pants.
And this from another article:
A former spokesman for the Sept. 11 commission, Al Felzenberg, confirmed that members of its staff, including executive director Philip Zelikow, were told about the program during an overseas trip in October 2003 that included stops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But Felzenberg said the briefers did not mention Atta's name. The report produced by the commission last year does not mention the episode.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1459716/posts
One of the things that turned me off Curt is the way he pulled his punches during Slick's impeachment. He voted to impeach on the lesser, not the greater, counts.
Whoa.
These are some names that knew:
A former spokesman for the Sept. 11 commission, Al Felzenberg, confirmed that members of its staff, including executive director Philip Zelikow, were told about the program during an overseas trip in October 2003 that included stops in Afghanistan and Pakistan. But Felzenberg said the briefers did not mention Atta's name. The report produced by the commission last year does not mention the episode. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1459716/posts
I remember when Ashcroft said, during the 9/11 hearing we were all watching live, that Gorelick created The Wall.
We all thought she'd be bounced from the 9/11 Commission. And instead, they all circled the wagons around her and defended her.
It was at that moment that anyone with a brain realized how tainted the Commission's findings were going to be.
And, as I recall, Freeper Kristinn personally distributed to Commission members copies of Al Gore's report on airline safety. That never made it into the report either.
It was Clinton legacy protection time for that Commission, at least half of them, and they performed beautifully.
"men were identified in 1999"
I was screaming at FOX today .. not one of their reports about this issue included any dates .. therefore leaving the public to believe it happened on Bush's watch.
I was livid .. and I let them know it. I expect that kind of tripe from the MSM .. but FOX viewers deserve to know the truth.
But if that was the case, why on earth would the NY Times break the story last night? It would be the kind of story the Times would ignore as long as possible, then run once in the Saturday edition.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.