Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59
Of course he "knew". Clintoon was too worried about stains on dresses and soggy cigars.

Wrong. Clinton knew, but he wasn't stopped by "stains on a dress". That was later.

Clinton's "terrorist units" were going after white middle-aged American men who used words like "constitution" and had high priest who killed policemen. ( Of course there's never been one documented case of one policemen being killed so someone could become a high priest, but it stirred up police forces at the time).

Clinton used the power of the government to go after the "vast right wing conspiracy" instead of UBL or Atta or any of the other real threats to our nation. There was a meeting in South Florida a few months before Hillary spilled the beans...

47 posted on 08/09/2005 7:08:29 AM PDT by GOPJ (A person who will lie for you, will lie against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GOPJ

Exactly! In fact, it was only months after the 1993 WTC attack that those nasty Christians at Waco were laid seige to...and murdered. It wasn't long after this that the Freeman in Montana also became targets of the federal government. Even after the OKC bombing...with an Arab-looking 3rd John Doe at large, it was Clinton who attacked Rush Limbaugh and the militia movement, making the far-right the worst enemy America had.

Throughout his term...even with Arab terrorism on the rise, Clinton did everything he could to appease the terrorists. And this included both foreign and military aid to Christian-hostile governments like those in Indonesia...or direct participation such as that in Serbia/Kosovo.

Part of my theory about this is not only Clinton's (and the Left's) hositility to Christianity...but his crusade for a legacy that included peace in the Middle-East. From the moment he stepped foot in office, he wasn't going to let anything, including what he percieved as a Christian/Israeli-bias, interfere with his plans.

In other words, Clinton couldn't (wouldn't) be tough on terrorism because he knew that had the potential to disrupt whatever plans he had; he didn't want to p*ssoff the Mid-East. Ironically, as he was targeting Christians around the country...and treating Muslim terrorists with kid gloves, not only did his peace-plan fail...so did the goodwill he tried to bridge with Islamofacsists as the attacks continued. Appeasement didn't work.


77 posted on 08/09/2005 12:47:31 PM PDT by cwb (Liberalsim is the opiate of the *asses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson