Posted on 07/31/2005 8:49:58 AM PDT by Republican Red
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1088666,00.html
I didn't even waste time reading the Time article spin. I'd rather read Podhoretz take on the "new information". He tends to be logical, smart and imo, dead-on with the facts.
Workable link to the Time article "When They Knew":
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1088666,00.html
Again the finger points at Colin Powell.
Would anyone in the media go to jail to protect Colin Powell?
Let's think about that for a second...would the media rather protect Powell...or Rove? Hmmm.
Yes there are a few.
Looks like Powell helped the anti Bolton groups.
Time tries to paint this as bad for Rove but I think just the opposite. It points the finger away from White House and right at the State Department.
The State Department was no friend to the Bush White House.
Valarie Phlame and Joe Wilson are suck a$$ demos who clamor for attention because their work product never amounted to crap. Neither has ever had a real job.
Towards the last few years that Powell was in the Administration, the media too a decided "liking" to him, after basically portraying him as an "house slave" and Condi Rice as an "Aunt Jemima"....
I am thinking that the change just may have occured around the time that all of this was getting started...
SO, obviously the media would/will/is covering for Powell, where they wouldn't for Rove or Libby.
Bwaaa, Haaa, Haaa - I'll bet Fitzgerald is.
This would seem to jive with the comment made some time ago- that his source was an 'administration official' who was 'no partisan gunslinger'
I have been pointing to Colin Powell as the leaker since July 13th.
He is a darling of the MSM and my belief is that Judith Miller is trying to (1)protect Colin Powell and all her other State dept leakers and (2)help her bosses keep the story from moving on to........the truth.
So, is Colin going to step forward as a Repblican or remain undercover as a "moderate"?
I actually think the Wilson-Plame story is just getting interesting. The Democrats and their media have been making such a big deal out of a non-story that when the facts actually start to come out it looks like it will bite them all in their collective butts.
On Meet The Press this morning the the story was being talked about by reporters with more "we really don't know yet" comments. That is far different from Rove outed a covert agent.
I'm not sure that State Department personnel are considered "administration officials". I don't think that the blanket disclosure waiver issued by the White House applies to the State Department.
So Miller rots in jail to protect Foggy Bottom.
For the sake of argument, let's say Powell is Judith Miller's source. But everyone thinks it's Rove. So everyone believes Rove is a scumbag for leaking the name. Powell, along with Rove and Libby, has signed a blanket waiver releasing all reporters from any confidentiality agreement. Is it ethical for Miller to keep her mouth shut if it unfairly impugns the integrity of both Rove and the White House?
Ah... The story that won't go away even though no one outside the media gives a rip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.