Conservatives Make Mistake Not Supporting Ed Klein's Book - (isn't this what Rush also says?)

NEWSMAX.COM ^ | JUNE 27, 2005 | JOHN LeBOUTILLIER

[CHARLITE]

"Not attacking the Clintons is the biggest mistake the Republicans can make.",br>

I couldn't agree more. These two vultures need total exposure...........FASTER, PLEASE!

[CHARLITE]

Ping-a-Ling!

Char :)

[Huck]

Bill O'Reilly - who is not a conservative but is the number one ranked host on Fox News Channel

Not anymore he isn't. Greta's #1. How funny is it that the top two shows on Fox, the supposed conservative channel, are a CNN courtroom retread and a big mouth tabloid tv retread from...what network was he from, anyway? Old Roger Ailes knows how to make money, boy, and it ain't by bringing quality programming to market.

[Mia T]

HILLARY CLINTONSTAHL
clinton agitprop machine censors truth about hillary

[Echo Talon]

Klein is a liberal why would I want to give him my money?

[FreedomSurge]

I heard Lucianne on Tony Snow - she was slamming the book. Given Lucianne's penitent for lying. This is the first independent confirmation for me that the book might be worth something.

[wolfpat]

How much more exposure will be enough? We already know how slimly the ex-President is, and She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named is the most dishonest person to be in politics since......well, I can't think of anyone who is comparable (At least Lucifer, Prince of Darkness, has enough respect for me to bother telling good lies).
The point is that nobody's opinion is going to be changed by this book.

[Gunrunner2]

Got the book.

Other than the hyped "rape" thing, it tracks fairly well at exposing her for what she truly is.

Thing is. . .this is really the first time a noted liberal of note has written such a scathing book on St Hillery. This alone makes it valuable in that it now moves criticism of Hitlery from the never-lands of right-wing nuts (as it were), to mainstream liberals.

Only thing is the timing stinks. Should have been released later to give more impact on the dems primary.

At any rate, the book legitimizes the criticisms of hitlery and that is a good thing.

[montag813]

Ed Klein's book seems to be as puerile as the couple it exposes. I have no interest in it. The "rape" allegation is so disgusting and out of bounds that it made me consider whether hillary herself put him up to it, so she could use it to get sympathy from women.

[uncbob]

I read the book and don't know what the big deal is

American Evita was a lot worse

[sirthomasthemore]

He obviously did not read a page of it because, if anything, the book repeats much of what has previously been published elsewhere.

*******************

Respectfully duisagree.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, when you know you're going to get the same result!

The Clintons have been bashed forever for their debauchery, deceit and scandals- it only serves to fortify their base.

Lazio attacked Hillary personally- he lost by 14 points.

There is one way Hillary is going to be defeated (and she will be defeated) if she runs for president- and it's to demonstrate by the record that she is a RADICAL!

There'll be a time to make that case. To attack her now based that which "repeats much of what has previously been published elsewhere" is only going to serve to put more money into her political coffers.

Conservatives shouldn't be exploited as foils by which she raises funds. Disregard this book- keep your power dry-and don't get taken in again.


Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

[wolfpat]

You're certainly right about the timing. Late 2007 would have been a better time. But would this book change the mind(?) of any of the democRAT kool-aid drinkers?

[Gunrunner2]

>>The Clintons have been bashed forever for their debauchery, deceit and scandals- it only serves to fortify their base.<<

But this is the first time a liberal writer of reputation has done so. . .thereby moving criticism of hitlery into the open light of day.

Yes, she will only be defeated by being identified as she truly is: a raging liberal hack/socialist. However, the book raises again her unsuitable character and agendas, and attacks a new crowd to find out for themselves if all this "hillery-bashing" has something to it.

Just me talking, though.

She is crude and shrewd: Plays the woman thing and stacks the deck; i.e., can't attack her because she is a women and therefore a victim, can't run away from her attacks because you would appear weak by comparison and she looks strong.

Much like fighting a girl; you win and all you did was beat up a girl; you lose and a girl beat you up.

Rice it the antidote for the woman thing. Rice would knock the snot outta St Hitlery. . .first round.

[Gunrunner2]

Probably not, but it will refocus the middle-of-the-road type.

For the kool-aid drinkers of the left, NOTHING could ever be said, done or be proved true against Hitlery that could ever change their stem cells (they have no minds).

[Gunrunner2]

"attacks" = attracts

[bkepley]

"this is really the first time a noted liberal of note has written such a scathing book"

NONONONONO!!!!

Partners In Power..the best anti-Clinton's book, by a noted Liberal. Partners In Power is a much better book. Klein's book is pretty lame IMHO.

[EagleUSA]

"Not attacking the Clintons is the biggest mistake the Republicans can make."
-----
Absolutely true. The Clintons have skated to the extent it is not an exaggeration to say that they have proven that CRIME PAYS IN POLITICS. It is sickening to see the MSM (not a suprise) bowing to the CLINTON THREATS which had to part and parcel to the whole deal of cancelling appearances of the author. How much money did Soros put on the table to intimidate the networks?

Hitlery is an extremist-Marxist. She is evil and driven by a power-lust that has really never been seen on the left at the left of Presidential hopefuls, at least not in my lifetime. Many of us who follow the Clinton trail of debauchery and crime, already know most of what is in the book, but the book needs support because it does provide the realities of Hitlery for the less-than-informed sector of our society. For some reason, when I see this woman, I am reminded of what kept Stalin in power in Russia...a mind-numbed, blind, brain-washed society that idolized him, in spite of his causing untold millions of deaths and extreme levels of oppression. Lots of parallels.

The liberal who wrote the book about Queen Darth Vader, given his research, those he extracted information from, provides a credible description of the hard leftist poster-princess...

[Fawn]

Given Lucianne's penitent for lying.

She lies?

[sirthomasthemore]

Rice it the antidote for the woman thing.

**********************
Gunrunner, don't make me go back over my old posts, but you are quoting me directly! (LOL)

Yes, Klein is liberal. The Book is also pushed by Vanity Fair. Remember Gail Sheedy (sp). She wrote that last "liberal" attack piece of Hillary for Vanity Fair before the Senate election- nice way to control the bad news, eh?

Just ask yourself; Why does Hillary not want the MSM to cover this book? Well, if I'm her, I don't want the liberal media to cover it- I want Rush, Hannity and the "vast right wing conspiracy" to do it, so I can say this is another VRWC attack.

Gunrunner, we don't need any part of this book now. There will be a time to attack Radical Hillary, but let's do it when we're ready and let's do it on our terms. Let's not play into her hands.




Clean your muskets and sharpen your pitchforks and get ready to ride to the sound of the guns.(KELO) :o}-

Dems, hello??? We could get out of Vietnam; we can’t GET OUT of terrorism.

[griswold3]

I cannot wait until the democratic primaries...
Edwards, Kerry, and Biden,etc. taking on Hillary...It'll be all worth watching.