Skip to comments.
Radio Candy Stunt Not So Sweet
(Woman sues when "100 Grand" prize turns out to be chocolate bar)
The Smoking Gun ^
| 06-23-05
| The Smoking Gun
Posted on 06/23/2005 10:41:16 AM PDT by rawhide
JUNE 23--A Kentucky woman who thought she won $100,000 in a radio station giveaway is suing for breach of contract after learning that her prize was actually a Nestle's 100 Grand candy bar. According to the below June 22 Circuit Court complaint, Norreasha Gill, 28, claims that she was listening to Lexington's WLTO-FM on the evening of May 25 when host DJ Slick announced that he would award "100 Grand" to the tenth caller. When Gill, the pregnant mother of three children, was that tenth caller, the radio host told her she could pick up her prize the following day at WLTO's studio. She subsequently learned that the contest was a "joke," according to her lawsuit, which names the radio station's parent company, Cumulus Media, as a defendant. Gill's lawsuit seeks the $100,000 prize and additional punitive damages. The 22-year-old DJ Slick, whose real name is Jason Hamman, is no longer working for WLTO, a departure apparently hastened by the May stunt. Hamman, pictured at left, declined to speak about the "100 Grand" incident when contacted by phone today. In a May 25 blog posting promoting that night's giveaway, Hamman wrote that he would be presenting "our loyal listeners with a chance to Win 100 GRAND!!!! It's sitting in a bag to my left ready for someone to take off with just like the Runaway bride!" The tenth caller, he added, would be "100 GRAND RICHER!!! No joke."
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 100grand; chocolate; deceit; deejaystunts; lawsuit; nomodstoday; onemoretime; prize
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-78 next last
1
posted on
06/23/2005 10:41:26 AM PDT
by
rawhide
To: rawhide
2
posted on
06/23/2005 10:42:30 AM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Get er done!)
To: glock rocks
Or the KEYS to a new car?
3
posted on
06/23/2005 10:44:25 AM PDT
by
marktuoni
To: rawhide
There's a Darwin Award story in here somewhere!
4
posted on
06/23/2005 10:44:38 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
(Pardon me, but is that a malaise sandwich in your pocket or are you just glad to be in a funk?)
To: glock rocks
5
posted on
06/23/2005 10:44:40 AM PDT
by
Hegemony Cricket
(No rolling stone ever says, "I want to be a Bryologist when I grow up!")
To: rawhide
Well its a pretty stupid joke but i dont see her winning unless that last part about being "richer" comes back to haunt him/them...
my guess is they give her 40 thou and she goes away
6
posted on
06/23/2005 10:45:42 AM PDT
by
skaterboy
(Me love you long time)
To: glock rocks
To: Hegemony Cricket
Reminds me when I told my students that I'd bring in a Christmas music CD the next day. "Which one?"
"M&M's".
Apparently, they misheard me.
8
posted on
06/23/2005 10:47:34 AM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: rawhide
9
posted on
06/23/2005 10:47:41 AM PDT
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: rawhide
She could have had a PayDay.
10
posted on
06/23/2005 10:48:00 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
To: rawhide
This person should be ashamed of filing this lawsuit and should be billed for ALL court costs.
It's obviously a joke and she has absolutely no legal claims to the remuneration.
11
posted on
06/23/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT
by
politicket
(Our Supreme Court just destroyed our land...any Patrick Henry's out there?)
To: rawhide
This same thing happened in Chicago about 15 years ago. A late night "wacky D.J." announced that the grand prize winner would get the "keys to a new BMW". So what the winner got was just the keys to a BMW, not the whole car. The winner went to court and sued, and collected. Plus the Wacky D.J. got fired.
P.S.: Never trust a DJ who goes by the name of "Slick". You are just asking for trouble.
12
posted on
06/23/2005 10:48:35 AM PDT
by
Lockbar
(March toward the sound of the guns.)
To: rawhide
To: skaterboy
All they need is a jury who wants to wipe the smile off of the smug faces of those punk DJs. Although her own greed should have taught her a lesson, I think it would be all too easy to have the radio station find itself $100K in debt after going to court.
14
posted on
06/23/2005 10:49:51 AM PDT
by
AmishDude
(Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
To: rawhide
My call: She'll get every dime of the $100,000.
Except of course, for the one third that will go to her lawyer and the additional percent that the IRS will reap.
To: rawhide
Did she eat the evidence in frustration?
To: rawhide
After today's USSC ruling regarding private property, absolutely no telling where this one ends up.
17
posted on
06/23/2005 10:52:03 AM PDT
by
PetroniDE
(We Don't Live in Texas Anymore --- State Name is Now TAXES !!)
To: rawhide
As a woman she probably misunderstood the man from Mars.
18
posted on
06/23/2005 10:53:26 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(If Social Security is so good - why aren't members of Congress in it?)
To: rawhide
Sounds like an Olde Honeymooner's episode (anybody remember that show?) where Ralph inherits a Rich old ladies "Fortune". He is positive he is rich, since the only family member was some worthless nephew, and the woman adored him every day boarding the bus.
When its finally awarded to him, it turns out to be her pet parrot, named naturally, "Fortune".
19
posted on
06/23/2005 10:54:22 AM PDT
by
C210N
(-)
To: Hegemony Cricket
PANAMA CITY, Fla. (AP) -- A former waitress has settled her lawsuit against Hooters, the restaurant that gave her a toy Yoda doll instead of the Toyota she thought she'd won.
Jodee Berry, 27, won a beer sales contest last May at the Panama City Beach Hooters. She believed she had won a new Toyota and happily was escorted to the restaurant's parking lot in a blindfold.
But when the blindfold was removed, she found she had won a new toy Yoda -- the little green character from the "Star Wars" movies.
David Noll, her attorney, said Wednesday that he could not disclose the settlement's details, although he said Berry can now go to a local car dealership and "pick out whatever type of Toyota she wants."
After the stunt, Berry quit the restaurant and filed a lawsuit against Gulf Coast Wings, Inc., the restaurant's corporate owner, alleging breach of contract and fraudulent misrepresentation.
The restaurant's manager, Jared Blair, has said the whole contest was an April Fools' joke.
20
posted on
06/23/2005 10:54:27 AM PDT
by
glock rocks
(Get er done!)
To: rawhide
She should win, the DJ should be fired.
21
posted on
06/23/2005 10:59:13 AM PDT
by
adam_az
(It's the border, stupid!)
To: rawhide
Hope she WINS the suit....
Making Liberals/RINOS re-think their logic has such a beauty to it..
Punitive charges should also be added..
22
posted on
06/23/2005 10:59:56 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: rawhide
Greed trumps the humor gene...
23
posted on
06/23/2005 11:00:20 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: scott7278
I remember that. That was Opie and Anthony on WAAF like 10 years ago, nu?
24
posted on
06/23/2005 11:00:26 AM PDT
by
Gefreiter
("Are you drinking 1% because you think you're fat?")
To: Publius6961
Yeah, it's funny because you aren't the butt of the joke. Practical jokes always laugh at somebody else's expense, and the sole purpose of jokes like this is to make somebody else look stupid and foolish so we can all laugh at them.
I hope the woman wins.
25
posted on
06/23/2005 11:07:14 AM PDT
by
frgoff
To: politicket
Don't be so sure about this.
Since on-air radio contests are very strictly regulated by the FCC and perhaps by individual states themselves (hence the lengthy disclaimers you always hear on these stations whenever they run a contest that involves large prizes), my guess is that she's going to win -- and rightfully so.
26
posted on
06/23/2005 11:07:54 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: Semper911
Except of course, for the one third that will go to her lawyer and the additional percent that the IRS will reap.Please note that the IRS will tax the entire $100,000, not just the $66,666.66 she will see. So subtract another $25,000 or so from her award.
27
posted on
06/23/2005 11:17:02 AM PDT
by
boojumsnark
(Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.)
To: Semper911
Except of course, for the one third that will go to her lawyer and the additional percent that the IRS will reap. And if I remember correctly, income taxes are paid on the FULL award, not net after lawyers get their cut. So at the end of the day, she is looking at having about $30K of the $100K.
28
posted on
06/23/2005 11:17:52 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: Alberta's Child
...and rightfully so
Not to be blunt, but this sounds like it was written by a former Canadian who has no idea about American jurisprudence. Have you ever read Blackwell's Commentaries? If not, then do it and see if you still have the same opinion.
29
posted on
06/23/2005 11:20:20 AM PDT
by
politicket
(Our Supreme Court just destroyed our land...any Patrick Henry's out there?)
To: rawhide
Sort of reminds me of an eBay auction a few years back. When XBox first came out a lady was having great trouble getting one for her son in her area. So she bid on one on eBay. The auction was for an XBox box.
Thats right, the box the XBox came in. She paid top dollar for it. She should have read the auction description better.
30
posted on
06/23/2005 11:20:59 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
To: rawhide
If she wins the suit, does she have to give up the candy bar?
31
posted on
06/23/2005 11:23:14 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(The theory of evolution is the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century - Michael Denton)
To: frgoff
Yeah, it's funny because you aren't the butt of the joke. Practical jokes always laugh at somebody else's expense, and the sole purpose of jokes like this is to make somebody else look stupid and foolish so we can all laugh at them.
Do you realize how many practical jokes that I have had played on me in my life? If you can't laugh at good humor then you really have issues.
This woman should have hung up the phone and IMMEDIATELY began planning a couter-offensive joke against this radio show host. After all, it's not the quality of the joke that's played on you - it's the quality of your rebuttal...
32
posted on
06/23/2005 11:23:19 AM PDT
by
politicket
(Our Supreme Court just destroyed our land...any Patrick Henry's out there?)
To: NautiNurse
Yeah, she could have had Mounds of money, but all she heard were the Snickers of the Goobers at the radio station. Looks like she'll just get Zero.
33
posted on
06/23/2005 11:25:52 AM PDT
by
Rokurota
(.)
To: Phantom Lord
Better than no K$ and a candy bar.....
34
posted on
06/23/2005 11:26:06 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: politicket
1. What does my background have to do with anything (and no, I'm not a "former Canadian")?
2. What do Blackwell's Commentaries on the Law (of England) have to do with American jurisprudence?
3. What is the legal distinction between an "on-air radio joke" and outright fraud (i.e., if a radio station promoted a contest with a cash prize but then refused to pay the winner)?
35
posted on
06/23/2005 11:28:36 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: Phantom Lord
$30 K when you had $0K before isn't bad....
I think that she'll prevail. This kind of thing goes way back and seems to usually go in favor of the duped.
There was a famous case about a car dealer advertising a car for 2,500 banana's or something and somebody showed up with a pick-up truck full of bananas.. Courts held that the advertisement had to be honored
36
posted on
06/23/2005 11:30:29 AM PDT
by
lOKKI
(You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
To: Semper911
The only time I received a court award, resulting from a vehicle collision case, I discovered the amount was not taxable. Where did you get your information that it's taxable?
If she had actually received $100,000 from the radio station's contest, that would certainly be taxable income, but I don't think a court awarded amount is.
But I could be wrong, I suppose.
37
posted on
06/23/2005 11:37:17 AM PDT
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: politicket
This woman should have hung up the phone and IMMEDIATELY began planning a couter-offensive joke against this radio show host. I'll bet the radio station would have filed charges against her if she crashed their server by sending 500 million e-mails, or depleted the ink in their fax machine by faxing them a black sheet of paper a couple of hundred times.
38
posted on
06/23/2005 11:37:24 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: savedbygrace
When you win a civil case for damages, the award is not taxable because it is compensating you for something that you "lost." If this woman wins a case against the radio station, she'll be receiving a cash prize instead of an injury/damages settlement.
39
posted on
06/23/2005 11:39:30 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: savedbygrace
The only time I received a court award, resulting from a vehicle collision case, I discovered the amount was not taxable. Where did you get your information that it's taxable? A little learning is a dangerous thing...
Damage awards and contest prizes are treated differently.
40
posted on
06/23/2005 11:43:34 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
To: Rokurota
41
posted on
06/23/2005 11:52:37 AM PDT
by
NautiNurse
("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
To: Alberta's Child
I'll bet the radio station would have filed charges against her if she crashed their server by sending 500 million e-mails, or depleted the ink in their fax machine by faxing them a black sheet of paper a couple of hundred times.
This woman lost nothing, and did no work worthy of remuneration. The only thing that she had was injured greed.
42
posted on
06/23/2005 12:07:42 PM PDT
by
politicket
(Our Supreme Court just destroyed our land...any Patrick Henry's out there?)
To: politicket
Blackstone is so 19th Century.
She deserves every cent. It was not a joke, it was fraud. Many fraudsters think their frauds, are funny. They aren't.
43
posted on
06/23/2005 12:08:51 PM PDT
by
NathanR
(Mexico: So far from God; So close to the USA.)
To: Alberta's Child; Publius6961
44
posted on
06/23/2005 12:16:34 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
To: Alberta's Child
What is the legal distinction between an "on-air radio joke" and outright fraud (i.e., if a radio station promoted a contest with a cash prize but then refused to pay the winner)? This sounds like fraud to me. The station should grow up and pay up. Firing the guy was not enough.
45
posted on
06/23/2005 12:30:35 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Deep Throat(s) -- top level FBI officials playing cub reporters for suckers.)
To: politicket
You could make the same statement about a case involving a retailer that advertises a product for $19.99 but then won't sell it for less than $500.
46
posted on
06/23/2005 12:33:26 PM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but lord I'm free.)
To: Gefreiter
I'm not sure of the timeframe, but it was indeed Opie and Anthony.
47
posted on
06/23/2005 12:35:45 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: rawhide
Gill's lawsuit seeks the $100,000 prize and additional punitive damages. Whats more pathetic that she is suing for the one hunderd grand or that she wants punitive damages on top of it... how sad it is when lawyers run our culture.
Personally I thinks its funny. If I was her I would probably not, but I would still not sue..
48
posted on
06/23/2005 12:38:21 PM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(I musta taken a wrong turn at 198.182.159.17)
To: Phantom Lord
When the sharks line up to feed.. the big ones feed first...then the little ones..
49
posted on
06/23/2005 12:38:36 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
To: politicket
And she may be laughing all the way to the bank.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson