Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mechanism behind intelligent design uncovered? - (says Darwin's theory "unworkable")
WORLD NET DAILY.COM ^ | JUNE 17, 2005 | DR. KELLY HOLLOWELL

Posted on 06/18/2005 7:04:07 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: RightWhale

Recent cosmogony is basically and effort to avoid the theological implications of the big bang theory. Is string theory any more valid than Ptolomy's epicycles. except that the latter fit the data better?


101 posted on 06/20/2005 10:35:02 AM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

That is quite a revelation. Might epicycles affect interplanetary trajectories?


102 posted on 06/20/2005 10:43:27 AM PDT by RightWhale (withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Sounds like an undergrad explanation of evolution.

Where are the space aliens? ID'ers claim the Designer is not God.


103 posted on 06/20/2005 10:52:34 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Above the electroweak breaking scale, we have quarks, leptons, gravitons, gluons, and electroweak bosons.

And no photons?

104 posted on 06/20/2005 11:15:12 AM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
And no photons?

That's right. Photons as such exist only below the electroweak breaking scale; they are really a low-energy mixture of two fundamental electroweak bosons. From Introduction to High Energy Physics by Donald H. Perkins, 3rd Edition, p. 322:

The fundamental vector bosons are a massless isovector triplet Wmu = Wmu(1), Wmu(2), Wmu(3) (for SU(2)) and a massless isosinglet Bmu (for U(1)). As a result of spontaneous symmetry breaking, three bosons (denoted Wmu+, Wmu-, and Zmu0) acquire mass, and one (Amu, the photon) remains massless. These four bosons are combinations of Wmu and Bmu...

(The "mu" is supposed to be a lowercase Greek letter mu.)

Above the electroweak breaking scale, you have W1, W2, W3 and B, which are the fundamental bosons; below that scale, you have W+, W-, Z0, and the photon, which are mixtures.

105 posted on 06/20/2005 12:09:54 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and (after a trillionth of a second or so) there was light.
106 posted on 06/20/2005 12:17:04 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Above the electroweak breaking scale, you have W1, W2, W3 and B, which are the fundamental bosons; below that scale, you have W+, W-, Z0, and the photon, which are mixtures.

Ahh, then there are no fundamental particles, everything is a mixture of massless things and the Higgs boson which is also rather elusive?

107 posted on 06/20/2005 1:56:17 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Ahh, then there are no fundamental particles,

Perhaps. We don't know, yet.

everything is a mixture of massless things

Masslessness is more elegant, more mathematically pure, so I would expect truly fundamental particles to be massless, yes. But that's OK; after all, photons are massless.

and the Higgs boson which is also rather elusive?

The Higgs boson is also a by-product of electroweak symmetry breaking.

108 posted on 06/20/2005 2:06:06 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
The Higgs boson is also a by-product of electroweak symmetry breaking.

Well, then that just puts the icing on the cake. Something that no longer exists came from nothing that did not exist giving us something we haven't found.

109 posted on 06/20/2005 2:17:35 PM PDT by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
It would all sound so ridiculous, if it weren't experimentally testable.
110 posted on 06/20/2005 7:49:42 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson