Verdict Reached in Jacko Case

Associated Press ^ | June 13, 2005 | Staff Writer

[shellshocked]

The prosectuor should becjailed for bringing such a fradulent case to court.What he did was a crime, not just a bad decision. He knew he placed liars on the stand and he knew he presented false evidence.

He did this case for the glory. He said so in so many ways.

[TBP]

Mark my words, at least another boy or two are going to come forward within the next year.

And will any prosecutor have the cojones to do anything about it?

[Blogger]

How do you know????

[drpix]

I didn't follow the Blake case as closely as I followed OJ, Schiavo & Jackson. With these 3, I was 100% sure... so I just added Jacko to my prior pic of OJ & Schiavo. But you could very well be right.

[somerville]

"Will any prosecutor have the cojones to do anything about it ?"

Yes. Fueled by a sense of justice and anger and with the right victim - i.e. - one whose mother isn't quite so f'ed up -- Jackson could be convicted easily.

[combat_boots]

What Shep said prior to Sneddon was a propos: all those years of yes men and women, all the exploitation as a little boy and as an adult. Now, in the courtroom, Jackson heard, perhaps for the first time, that many Americans do not like and, more importantly--myself included--do not approve of adults sleeping with young boys (or girls). Shep at one point even raised his voice and said, "No!" He ended by saying he hoped Jackson would think on and come to grips with whatever it is that he has learned about himself in this, and, that he will change his ways.

Loved it.

[TBP]

I hope you're right, but I wonder. This is California, after all.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Part of the problem in child molestation cases is that a skilled molester develops a good sense of how to pick a victim. And one of the things he looks for in a victim is a vunerable family: one that's too stupid or self absorbed to realize what is happening to the child until its too late and then is too "complicit" to put up much of a prosecutorial fight.

[ThirstyMan]

I think the mother who let her son stay with this pervert should be put on trial. I can't imagine letting a young boy stay over night in the same bed with "Michael the Molester."

[Moral Hazard]

So will the mother now be charged with perjury for the J.C. Penny case since she admitted under oath that in the Michael Jackson case that she had lied?

[go-ken-go]

I say in my mind, he is as guilty as the priests, but, I knew darn well, Jackson would never, ever be found guilty.
I wish the prosecutor would have asked the jury if they were willing to send their boys over there tonight. Jackson is a creepy pervert. I hope the jury sleeps well.

[cdawg20]

At least I have great legal precedent for scoring with some high school chicks again. No sir, I was just playing funtime with those 16 yr old cheerleaders.

[nmh]

"Actually he has plans to move to Europe or Africa, which is a pedo's dream."

The sooner the better.

Again, celebrities can get away with murder and now, sexual molestation. A victory for the perverts! What's so totally disgusting is this "innocent" charade - I sleep with little boys from a grown man in his 40's - ABSURD! Naked little boys in magazines which he didn't bother to destroy KNOWING his brothel would be searched is unbelievably ARROGANT - he was in your face with his sick perversion and he walks.

Then there are others who don't care if he is guilty or not; they like his music. The moral priorities and moral depravity here is beyond the pale. It's over the top.

Totally disgusted.