Skip to comments.
Free Republic's Comments on the FEC's Draft Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Internet Communications
Federal Election Commission ^
| Friday, June 3, 2005
| Kristinn
Posted on 06/09/2005 1:35:23 PM PDT by kristinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
The source link will take you to the FEC's page with other comments by various groups and individuals.
Free Republic is one of 22 groups and individuals that requested to testify at the FEC's public hearings June 28-29, 2005.
This is posted as submitted. My apologies for any typos and mangled sentences.
1
posted on
06/09/2005 1:35:24 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: BillF; BufordP; sauropod; Doctor Raoul; staytrue; Angelwood
To: kristinn
Thanks for the post. Good letter!
3
posted on
06/09/2005 1:38:34 PM PDT
by
beltfed308
(Cloth or link. Happiness is a perfect trunion.)
To: kristinn
4
posted on
06/09/2005 1:41:11 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
To: kristinn
It is a foolish thing for a mouse (govt)to mess with (anger)a pit bull (free populace).
To: KylaStarr; Cindy; StillProud2BeFree; nw_arizona_granny; Velveeta; Dolphy; appalachian_dweller; ...
6
posted on
06/09/2005 1:42:47 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: tgslTakoma
7
posted on
06/09/2005 1:42:52 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(De gustibus non est disputandum)
To: kristinn
What is the next step? Does the request for attendence have to be approved?
8
posted on
06/09/2005 1:43:46 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: kristinn
Would this, if it were to happen, include foreign FReepers?
9
posted on
06/09/2005 1:46:31 PM PDT
by
Irish_Thatcherite
(Orwellian Relativism: All philosophies are equal, but some philosophies are more equal than others.)
To: clearsight
Amendent I, Constitution of the United States:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.What part of "Congress shall make no law" doesn't Congress understand?
See: THE SACREDBULL BASIC ENGLISH AND MATH TEST FOR AMERICAN POLITICIANS
10
posted on
06/09/2005 1:47:51 PM PDT
by
FreeKeys
(The thing about big govt. is it always falls into the hands of the very worst people sooner or later)
To: kristinn
11
posted on
06/09/2005 1:49:21 PM PDT
by
JesseJane
(43 - First 'illegal alien' Presidente')
To: FreeKeys
What part of "Congress shall make no law" doesn't Congress understand? That smudge between "make" and "law". Was that an ink drop on the original? They are also trying to figure out why the Founding Fathers skipped from Amendment VIII to Amendment XI.
12
posted on
06/09/2005 1:50:56 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Republicans and Democrats no longer exist. There are only Fabian and revolutionary socialists.)
To: kristinn
Great job kristinn, thanks!
13
posted on
06/09/2005 1:53:38 PM PDT
by
Jean S
To: kristinn
Is this a good time for me to change me screen name to something sweet and nice??
14
posted on
06/09/2005 1:53:51 PM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Who owns this car with the peace sign, the mag wheels, and four on the floor?)
To: Irish_Thatcherite
15
posted on
06/09/2005 1:57:16 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: HEY4QDEMS
Something along the lines of MD4Bush might do :-)
16
posted on
06/09/2005 1:58:12 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: JeanS
17
posted on
06/09/2005 1:58:57 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: FreeKeys
What part of "Congress shall make no law" doesn't Congress understand? There are no absolutes. The FEC could rule that slander laws apply to internet bulletin boards and believe me, there is plenty of slander going on, some at FR and more than that at DU.
They could also rule that poorly worded comments be banned if they could be construed to constitute a threat to someone or some thing.
They could also rule that NO copyrighted material of any kind be posted.
They could also rule that no material from FR be reprinted or reposted elsewhere.
18
posted on
06/09/2005 1:59:34 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: Calpernia
We haven't received an invite yet. However, we'll probably get the chance. The comment period just closed last Friday night.
19
posted on
06/09/2005 2:01:56 PM PDT
by
kristinn
To: kristinn
They are trying to force identity disclosure? Maybe we
do need to push back against the "Patriot Act", if for no other reason than to keep them on the defensive vis a vis snooping.
-Eric
20
posted on
06/09/2005 2:02:47 PM PDT
by
E Rocc
(If God is watching us, we can at least try to be entertaining)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson